County-level racial bias is associated with worse care for white and especially black older US adults: a cross-sectional observational study.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017430
Matthew L Mizel, Ann Haas, John L Adams, Steven C Martino, Amelia M Haviland, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Jacob W Dembosky, Malcolm Williams, Gary Abel, Jessica Maksut, Jennifer Gildner, Marc N Elliott
{"title":"County-level racial bias is associated with worse care for white and especially black older US adults: a cross-sectional observational study.","authors":"Matthew L Mizel, Ann Haas, John L Adams, Steven C Martino, Amelia M Haviland, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Jacob W Dembosky, Malcolm Williams, Gary Abel, Jessica Maksut, Jennifer Gildner, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association of county-level bias about black and white people with patient experience, influenza immunisation, and quality of clinical care for black and white older US adults (age 65+ years).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Linear multivariable regression measured the cross-sectional association of county-level estimates of implicit and explicit bias about black and white people with patient experiences, influenza immunisation, and clinical quality-of-care for black and white older US adults.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We used data from 1.9 million white adults who completed implicit and explicit bias measures during 2003-2018, patient experience and influenza immunisation data from respondents to the 2009-2017 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (MCAHPS) Surveys, and clinical quality-of-care data from patients whose records were included in 2009-2017 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) submissions (n=0.8-2.9 million per measure).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Three patient experience measures and patient-reported influenza immunisation from the MCAHPS Survey; five HEDIS measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In county-level models, higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with lower immunisation rates and worse scores for some patient experience measures for black and white adults as well as larger-magnitude black-white disparities. Higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with worse scores for some HEDIS measures for black and white adults but not with black-white disparities in clinical quality of care. Most significant associations were small in magnitude (effect sizes of 0.2-0.3 or less).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To the extent that county-level pro-white implicit bias is indicative of bias among healthcare providers, there may be a need for interventions designed to prevent such bias from adversely affecting the experiences and preventive care of black patients and the clinical quality of care for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association of county-level bias about black and white people with patient experience, influenza immunisation, and quality of clinical care for black and white older US adults (age 65+ years).

Design: Linear multivariable regression measured the cross-sectional association of county-level estimates of implicit and explicit bias about black and white people with patient experiences, influenza immunisation, and clinical quality-of-care for black and white older US adults.

Participants: We used data from 1.9 million white adults who completed implicit and explicit bias measures during 2003-2018, patient experience and influenza immunisation data from respondents to the 2009-2017 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (MCAHPS) Surveys, and clinical quality-of-care data from patients whose records were included in 2009-2017 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) submissions (n=0.8-2.9 million per measure).

Main outcome measures: Three patient experience measures and patient-reported influenza immunisation from the MCAHPS Survey; five HEDIS measures.

Results: In county-level models, higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with lower immunisation rates and worse scores for some patient experience measures for black and white adults as well as larger-magnitude black-white disparities. Higher pro-white implicit bias was associated with worse scores for some HEDIS measures for black and white adults but not with black-white disparities in clinical quality of care. Most significant associations were small in magnitude (effect sizes of 0.2-0.3 or less).

Conclusions: To the extent that county-level pro-white implicit bias is indicative of bias among healthcare providers, there may be a need for interventions designed to prevent such bias from adversely affecting the experiences and preventive care of black patients and the clinical quality of care for all patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
县级种族偏见与美国白人、尤其是黑人老年人护理状况恶化有关:一项横断面观察研究。
目的评估县级对黑人和白人的偏见与美国黑人和白人老年人(65 岁以上)的患者体验、流感免疫接种和临床护理质量之间的关联:线性多变量回归测量了县级对黑人和白人的隐性和显性偏见估计值与美国黑人和白人老年人的患者经历、流感免疫接种和临床护理质量之间的横截面关联:我们使用了190万白人成年人在2003-2018年期间完成的隐性和显性偏见测量数据、2009-2017年医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(MCAHPS)调查受访者的患者体验和流感免疫数据,以及2009-2017年医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)提交记录中包含的患者临床护理质量数据(每项测量的n=0.8-2.9百万):主要结果测量指标:MCAHPS调查中的三项患者体验测量指标和患者报告的流感免疫接种情况;五项HEDIS测量指标:在县级模型中,较高的亲白人隐性偏见与较低的免疫接种率、黑人和白人成年人在某些患者体验测量中的得分较差以及较大的黑白差距有关。较高的亲白人隐性偏差与黑人和白人成年人在某些 HEDIS 测量中得分较低有关,但与临床护理质量方面的黑白差异无关。大多数有意义的关联程度较小(效应大小为 0.2-0.3 或更小):如果县级支持白人的隐性偏见表明医疗服务提供者存在偏见,则可能需要采取干预措施,防止这种偏见对黑人患者的就医体验和预防性护理以及所有患者的临床护理质量产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
期刊最新文献
What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping review. Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study. Assessing patient work system factors for medication management during transition of care among older adults: an observational study. Sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll: the only reasons for regulators to target individuals. Patient-activated escalation in hospital: patients and their families are ready!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1