Comparative analysis of functional outcomes in arthroscopic repair for traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07897-x
Aixin Liu, Mingxing Wang, Baorui Zhang, Tong Lai, Gongyi Wu, Shilin Liu, Tao Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of functional outcomes in arthroscopic repair for traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries.","authors":"Aixin Liu, Mingxing Wang, Baorui Zhang, Tong Lai, Gongyi Wu, Shilin Liu, Tao Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-07897-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of the etiology of rotator cuff injury (RCI) on outcomes after rotator cuff repair remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with RCIs of different etiologies and identify the risk factors affecting prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 73 patients with RCI who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The patients were categorized into either a traumatic group or a non-traumatic group based on their history of trauma. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, and physical examination findings specific to the shoulder for both groups. Clinical differences between arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic RCIs were evaluated using univariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis determined independent risk factors for rotator cuff repair prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 73 patients, 31 were in the traumatic group and 42 in the non-traumatic group, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months and a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. The duration of the disease was significantly longer in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group (P < 0.001). The mean tear area was more significant in the traumatic group than in the non-traumatic group (P = 0.003), and the preoperative pain level and functional scores were better in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group. Postoperatively, there were no differences between the two groups regarding scores, joint mobility, strength, and complications. At 12 months postoperatively, multivariate regression analysis indicated that full-layer tear (OR = 5.106, 95% CI: 1.137-22.927, P = 0.033), fat infiltration (OR = 6.020, 95% CI: 1.113-32.554, P = 0.037), and tear area (OR = 6.038, 95% CI: 2.122-17.177, P < 0.001) significantly affected the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with non-traumatic RCI, traumatic RCI presents with more pronounced pain and impaired joint function preoperatively yet demonstrates comparable postoperative clinical outcomes. Full-layer tears, fat infiltration, and large tear areas are unfavorable factors affecting rotator cuff repair, and postoperative rehabilitation management of these patients should be emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07897-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of the etiology of rotator cuff injury (RCI) on outcomes after rotator cuff repair remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with RCIs of different etiologies and identify the risk factors affecting prognosis.

Methods: This study included 73 patients with RCI who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The patients were categorized into either a traumatic group or a non-traumatic group based on their history of trauma. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, and physical examination findings specific to the shoulder for both groups. Clinical differences between arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic RCIs were evaluated using univariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis determined independent risk factors for rotator cuff repair prognosis.

Results: Among the 73 patients, 31 were in the traumatic group and 42 in the non-traumatic group, with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months and a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. The duration of the disease was significantly longer in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group (P < 0.001). The mean tear area was more significant in the traumatic group than in the non-traumatic group (P = 0.003), and the preoperative pain level and functional scores were better in the non-traumatic group compared with the traumatic group. Postoperatively, there were no differences between the two groups regarding scores, joint mobility, strength, and complications. At 12 months postoperatively, multivariate regression analysis indicated that full-layer tear (OR = 5.106, 95% CI: 1.137-22.927, P = 0.033), fat infiltration (OR = 6.020, 95% CI: 1.113-32.554, P = 0.037), and tear area (OR = 6.038, 95% CI: 2.122-17.177, P < 0.001) significantly affected the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score.

Conclusion: Compared with non-traumatic RCI, traumatic RCI presents with more pronounced pain and impaired joint function preoperatively yet demonstrates comparable postoperative clinical outcomes. Full-layer tears, fat infiltration, and large tear areas are unfavorable factors affecting rotator cuff repair, and postoperative rehabilitation management of these patients should be emphasized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性和非创伤性肩袖损伤关节镜修复术功能效果的比较分析。
背景:肩袖损伤(RCI)的病因对肩袖修复术后预后的影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估不同病因的 RCI 患者的术后效果,并确定影响预后的风险因素:本研究纳入了 73 名接受关节镜肩袖修复术的 RCI 患者。根据外伤史将患者分为外伤组和非外伤组。术前和术后评估包括两组患者的肩关节活动范围、肌肉力量和肩部体格检查结果。通过单变量分析评估了创伤性和非创伤性 RCI 关节镜修复术的临床差异。逻辑回归分析确定了肩袖修复预后的独立风险因素:73例患者中,创伤组31例,非创伤组42例,术后随访时间最短为12个月,平均随访时间为13.8个月。与外伤组相比,非外伤组的病程明显更长(P 结论:非外伤组的病程比外伤组更长:与非创伤性 RCI 相比,创伤性 RCI 在术前表现出更明显的疼痛和关节功能受损,但术后临床疗效相当。全层撕裂、脂肪浸润和大面积撕裂是影响肩袖修复的不利因素,应重视这些患者的术后康复管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
CILP-2 expression in the intervertebral discs of patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Novel hook plate for radial semilunar lip facet fragment fixation: a finite element analysis. The association between metabolite profiles and impaired bone microstructure in adult growth hormone deficient rats. Translation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Activity Patterns Scale (APS) in musculoskeletal pain: a methodological study. Joint preservation in revision arthroplasty and intercalary tumour implants using custom stem solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1