Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857
Passara Jongkhajornpong, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Pawin Numthavaj, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian
{"title":"Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Passara Jongkhajornpong, Kaevalin Lekhanont, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Pawin Numthavaj, Gareth McKay, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04683796.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).

Methods and analysis: A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.

Results: At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.

Conclusion: In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.

Trial registration number: NCT04683796.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
100% 自体富血小板血浆和 100% 自体血清对干眼症的疗效:随机对照试验。
目的:目的是比较未经稀释的自体富血小板血浆(APRP)和自体血清(AS)对中重度干眼症(DED)患者的治疗效果:进行了一项单中心、随机、双掩蔽、非劣效性临床试验。96名眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分≥23和/或牛津染色等级≥2的成人干眼症患者被随机分配接受100% APRP(48人)或100% AS(48人)治疗,为期4周。主要结果包括 4 周后的 OSDI 评分和牛津分级法测定的眼表染色。次要结果包括荧光素泪液破裂时间、Schirmer试验、睑板腺质量和可表达性以及不良事件。我们估算了各组间OSDI评分平均差异的95% CI,以评估OSDI评分的非劣效性,预设差值为4.18分:第4周时,各组间的OSDI评分下降幅度无显著差异,平均差异(100% APRP-100% AS)为1.41(95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299)。上限小于预设差值,表明100% APRP与100% AS相比无劣效性。治疗后达到牛津0-1级的概率组间无显著差异,OR值为0.61(95% CI 0.25,1.52,p=0.288)。各组间的次要结果无明显差异:结论:在短期内,100% APRP 在减轻中重度 DED 干眼症状和眼表面染色方面并不逊色于 100% AS:试验注册号:NCT04683796。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of choroidal vascular alterations in eyes with myopia using ultrawidefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence in age-related macular degeneration. Network-based hub biomarker discovery for glaucoma. Investigating the effects of simulated high altitude on colour discrimination. Total retinal thickness is an important factor in evaluating diabetic retinal neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1