Effects of using different dentin conditioners on dentin regeneration.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.14715/cmb/2024.70.9.11
Hiwa Saeed Khidir, Sazan Sherdl Saleem
{"title":"Effects of using different dentin conditioners on dentin regeneration.","authors":"Hiwa Saeed Khidir, Sazan Sherdl Saleem","doi":"10.14715/cmb/2024.70.9.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This experiment aimed to evaluate the impact of several dentine etching and conditioning agents on growth factors (GFs) liberation from dentine slices. Eighteen dentine slices were obtained from nine premolars divided in to six groups, the slices immersed in one mL test solutions for 5 min; Group 1: white Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Group 2: Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Group 3: 37% phosphoric acid, Group 4: 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), Group 5: 10% Maleic acid (MAc), and Group 6: 0.7% Fumaric acid. The solutions were removed and stored directly at for further detection and quantification of transforming GF beta 1 (TGF-b1), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean release and standard deviation between groups (α = 0.05). Tukey's post hoc applied for multiple comparisons. After five min conditioning of dentine slices, white MTA released the highest level of TGF-b1, BMP2 and VEGF among all groups, followed by 0.7% Fumaric acid with no significant difference between them, but compared to 37% phosphoric acid and PBS groups significant difference observed, which they released the least amount of GFs amongst all groups. Based on the results of this research the detectable release of TGF-b1, BMP2 and VEGF by 0.7% fumaric acid was comparable with white MTA from dentin slices.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2024.70.9.11","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This experiment aimed to evaluate the impact of several dentine etching and conditioning agents on growth factors (GFs) liberation from dentine slices. Eighteen dentine slices were obtained from nine premolars divided in to six groups, the slices immersed in one mL test solutions for 5 min; Group 1: white Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Group 2: Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Group 3: 37% phosphoric acid, Group 4: 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), Group 5: 10% Maleic acid (MAc), and Group 6: 0.7% Fumaric acid. The solutions were removed and stored directly at for further detection and quantification of transforming GF beta 1 (TGF-b1), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean release and standard deviation between groups (α = 0.05). Tukey's post hoc applied for multiple comparisons. After five min conditioning of dentine slices, white MTA released the highest level of TGF-b1, BMP2 and VEGF among all groups, followed by 0.7% Fumaric acid with no significant difference between them, but compared to 37% phosphoric acid and PBS groups significant difference observed, which they released the least amount of GFs amongst all groups. Based on the results of this research the detectable release of TGF-b1, BMP2 and VEGF by 0.7% fumaric acid was comparable with white MTA from dentin slices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同牙本质调节剂对牙本质再生的影响
本实验旨在评估几种牙本质蚀刻和调理剂对牙本质切片中生长因子(GFs)释放的影响。从 9 颗前臼齿中获取 18 片牙本质切片,分成 6 组,将切片浸入 1 mL 试验溶液中 5 分钟;第 1 组:白色三氧化二铝骨料 (MTA);第 2 组:磷酸盐缓冲盐水 (PBS);第 3 组:37 毫升试验溶液;第 4 组:37 毫升试验溶液;第 5 组:37 毫升试验溶液:第 1 组:白色三氧化二矿骨料(MTA);第 2 组:磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS);第 3 组:37% 磷酸;第 4 组:17% 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA);第 5 组:10% 马来酸(MAc);第 6 组:0.7% 富马酸。取出溶液后直接保存,以便进一步通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测和量化转化生长因子 beta1(TGF-b1)、骨形态发生蛋白 2(BMP2)和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)。采用单因素方差分析比较组间平均释放量和标准偏差(α = 0.05)。Tukey's post hoc 用于多重比较。在对牙本质切片进行 5 分钟的调理后,白色 MTA 释放的 TGF-b1、BMP2 和 VEGF 水平在所有组中最高,其次是 0.7% 富马酸组,它们之间没有显著差异,但与 37% 磷酸组和 PBS 组相比,观察到显著差异,它们释放的 GFs 在所有组中最少。根据这项研究的结果,0.7% 富马酸与白色 MTA 从牙本质切片中可检测到的 TGF-b1、BMP2 和 VEGF 释放量相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1