Abemaciclib plus non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Final results of the randomized phase III MONARCH plus trial.

IF 7.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Chinese Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000003151
Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Yongmei Yin, Huiping Li, Min Yan, Zhongsheng Tong, Man Li, Yue'e Teng, Christina Pimentel Oppermann, Govind Babu Kanakasetty, Ma Coccia Portugal, Liu Yang, Wanli Zhang, Zefei Jiang
{"title":"Abemaciclib plus non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Final results of the randomized phase III MONARCH plus trial.","authors":"Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Tao Sun, Yongmei Yin, Huiping Li, Min Yan, Zhongsheng Tong, Man Li, Yue'e Teng, Christina Pimentel Oppermann, Govind Babu Kanakasetty, Ma Coccia Portugal, Liu Yang, Wanli Zhang, Zefei Jiang","doi":"10.1097/CM9.0000000000003151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the interim analysis of MONARCH plus, adding abemaciclib to endocrine therapy (ET) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in predominantly Chinese postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study presents the final pre-planned PFS analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the phase III MONARCH plus study, postmenopausal women in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa with HR+/HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in an advanced setting (cohort A) or progression on prior ET (cohort B) were randomized (2:1) to abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily [BID]) or placebo plus: anastrozole (1.0 mg/day) or letrozole (2.5 mg/day) (cohort A) or fulvestrant (500 mg) (cohort B). The primary endpoint was PFS of cohort A. Secondary endpoints included cohort B PFS (key secondary endpoint), ORR, overall survival (OS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cohort A (abemaciclib: n  = 207; placebo: n  = 99), abemaciclib plus a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor improved median PFS vs . placebo (28.27 months vs . 14.73 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.476; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.348-0.649). In cohort B (abemaciclib: n  = 104; placebo: n  = 53), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant improved median PFS vs . placebo (11.41 months vs . 5.59 months, HR: 0.480; 95% CI: 0.322-0.715). Abemaciclib numerically improved ORR. Although immature, a trend toward OS benefit with abemaciclib was observed (cohort A: HR: 0.893, 95% CI: 0.553-1.443; cohort B: HR: 0.512, 95% CI: 0.281-0.931). The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events in the abemaciclib arms were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia (both cohorts), and lymphocytopenia (cohort B). Abemaciclib did not cause clinically meaningful changes in patient-reported global health, functioning, or most symptoms vs . placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abemaciclib plus ET led to improvements in PFS and ORR, a manageable safety profile, and sustained HRQoL, providing clinical benefit without a high toxicity burden or reduced quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02763566).</p>","PeriodicalId":10183,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the interim analysis of MONARCH plus, adding abemaciclib to endocrine therapy (ET) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in predominantly Chinese postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study presents the final pre-planned PFS analysis.

Methods: In the phase III MONARCH plus study, postmenopausal women in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa with HR+/HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in an advanced setting (cohort A) or progression on prior ET (cohort B) were randomized (2:1) to abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily [BID]) or placebo plus: anastrozole (1.0 mg/day) or letrozole (2.5 mg/day) (cohort A) or fulvestrant (500 mg) (cohort B). The primary endpoint was PFS of cohort A. Secondary endpoints included cohort B PFS (key secondary endpoint), ORR, overall survival (OS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Results: In cohort A (abemaciclib: n  = 207; placebo: n  = 99), abemaciclib plus a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor improved median PFS vs . placebo (28.27 months vs . 14.73 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.476; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.348-0.649). In cohort B (abemaciclib: n  = 104; placebo: n  = 53), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant improved median PFS vs . placebo (11.41 months vs . 5.59 months, HR: 0.480; 95% CI: 0.322-0.715). Abemaciclib numerically improved ORR. Although immature, a trend toward OS benefit with abemaciclib was observed (cohort A: HR: 0.893, 95% CI: 0.553-1.443; cohort B: HR: 0.512, 95% CI: 0.281-0.931). The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events in the abemaciclib arms were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia (both cohorts), and lymphocytopenia (cohort B). Abemaciclib did not cause clinically meaningful changes in patient-reported global health, functioning, or most symptoms vs . placebo.

Conclusions: Abemaciclib plus ET led to improvements in PFS and ORR, a manageable safety profile, and sustained HRQoL, providing clinical benefit without a high toxicity burden or reduced quality of life.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02763566).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abemaciclib 联合非甾体类芳香化酶抑制剂或氟维司群治疗 HR+/HER2- 晚期乳腺癌女性患者:随机III期MONARCH plus试验的最终结果。
研究背景在MONARCH plus的中期分析中,在内分泌治疗(ET)的基础上加用阿巴西利(abemaciclib)可改善主要为中国绝经后女性HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和客观反应率(ORR)。本研究介绍了最终的预计划 PFS 分析:在Ⅲ期MONARCH plus研究中,中国、印度、巴西和南非的HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌绝经后妇女既往未接受过晚期系统治疗(队列A)或既往ET治疗进展(队列B),被随机(2:1)分配到阿贝昔单抗(150 毫克,每天两次[BID])或安慰剂加:阿那曲唑(1.0毫克/天)或来曲唑(2.5毫克/天)(队列A)或氟维司群(500毫克)(队列B)。次要终点包括队列B的PFS(关键次要终点)、ORR、总生存期(OS)、安全性和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL):在队列 A 中(阿培莫司利:n = 207;安慰剂:n = 99),阿培莫司利加非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂与安慰剂相比改善了中位 PFS(28.27 个月与 14.73 个月,危险比 [HR]:0.476; 95% 置信区间 [95% CI]:0.348-0.649).在队列 B 中(阿培莫司利:n = 104;安慰剂:n = 53),阿培莫司利加氟维司群与安慰剂相比,中位 PFS 得到改善(11.41 个月 vs . 5.59 个月,HR:0.480;95% CI:0.322-0.715)。Abemaciclib 在数值上提高了 ORR。尽管尚不成熟,但观察到阿贝单抗对OS有益的趋势(队列A:HR:0.893,95% CI:0.553-1.443;队列B:HR:0.512,95% CI:0.281-0.931)。阿柏西尼治疗组最常见的≥3级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少、白细胞减少、贫血(两个队列)和淋巴细胞减少(队列B)。与安慰剂相比,Abemaciclib在患者报告的总体健康状况、功能或大多数症状方面没有引起有临床意义的变化:结论:Abemaciclib加ET可改善PFS和ORR,具有可控的安全性和持续的HRQoL,在提供临床获益的同时不会带来高毒性负担或降低生活质量:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02763566)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Journal
Chinese Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
19245
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Chinese Medical Journal (CMJ) is published semimonthly in English by the Chinese Medical Association, and is a peer reviewed general medical journal for all doctors, researchers, and health workers regardless of their medical specialty or type of employment. Established in 1887, it is the oldest medical periodical in China and is distributed worldwide. The journal functions as a window into China’s medical sciences and reflects the advances and progress in China’s medical sciences and technology. It serves the objective of international academic exchange. The journal includes Original Articles, Editorial, Review Articles, Medical Progress, Brief Reports, Case Reports, Viewpoint, Clinical Exchange, Letter,and News,etc. CMJ is abstracted or indexed in many databases including Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Index Medicus/Medline, Science Citation Index (SCI), Current Contents, Cancerlit, Health Plan & Administration, Embase, Social Scisearch, Aidsline, Toxline, Biocommercial Abstracts, Arts and Humanities Search, Nuclear Science Abstracts, Water Resources Abstracts, Cab Abstracts, Occupation Safety & Health, etc. In 2007, the impact factor of the journal by SCI is 0.636, and the total citation is 2315.
期刊最新文献
Efferocytosis: A new therapeutic target for stroke. Cell components of tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma: Promising targets for small-molecule compounds. Essential tremor plus affect disease prognosis: A longitudinal study. How does the brain emerge from anesthesia and regain consciousness. What is new about growth-friendly implants for pediatric spinal deformity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1