A Directed Content Analysis of Discussions Between Mothers and Pediatricians Around Feeding and Growth Topics During Infant Well-Child Visits.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Clinical Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1177/00099228241287629
Meghan C Savidge, Melanie K Bean, Laura J Caccavale, Romesh Wijesooriya, Elizabeth L Adams
{"title":"A Directed Content Analysis of Discussions Between Mothers and Pediatricians Around Feeding and Growth Topics During Infant Well-Child Visits.","authors":"Meghan C Savidge, Melanie K Bean, Laura J Caccavale, Romesh Wijesooriya, Elizabeth L Adams","doi":"10.1177/00099228241287629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study identified specific feeding and growth topics discussed during 2-, 4-, and 6-month well-child visits. Conversations between mothers (N = 20) and pediatricians (N = 5) during visits were audio-recorded. Conversation segments were classified as pediatrician-initiated guidance, mother-initiated questions/concerns, or updates using directed content analysis. Pediatricians and mothers completed surveys on perceptions of guidance delivered. Feeding clusters included introducing solids/drinks, breast milk/formula amount and timing, feeding in specific situations; and breast milk/formula preparation. Growth clusters included appropriate growth and growth tracking. There was considerable variability in specific topics discussed between and within families across visits. Mothers desired additional guidance around introducing solids (42.1%) and allergen foods (31.6%). Pediatricians (80%) felt the amount of guidance to deliver in a standard visit was too much, and additional guidance outside of visits would benefit caregivers. Future research should investigate strategies to further support families by offering additional guidance during or outside of well-child visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10363,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"99228241287629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228241287629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study identified specific feeding and growth topics discussed during 2-, 4-, and 6-month well-child visits. Conversations between mothers (N = 20) and pediatricians (N = 5) during visits were audio-recorded. Conversation segments were classified as pediatrician-initiated guidance, mother-initiated questions/concerns, or updates using directed content analysis. Pediatricians and mothers completed surveys on perceptions of guidance delivered. Feeding clusters included introducing solids/drinks, breast milk/formula amount and timing, feeding in specific situations; and breast milk/formula preparation. Growth clusters included appropriate growth and growth tracking. There was considerable variability in specific topics discussed between and within families across visits. Mothers desired additional guidance around introducing solids (42.1%) and allergen foods (31.6%). Pediatricians (80%) felt the amount of guidance to deliver in a standard visit was too much, and additional guidance outside of visits would benefit caregivers. Future research should investigate strategies to further support families by offering additional guidance during or outside of well-child visits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对母亲和儿科医生在婴儿健康访视期间围绕喂养和成长话题进行讨论的定向内容分析。
本研究确定了在 2 个月、4 个月和 6 个月的儿童健康访视中讨论的特定喂养和生长话题。对母亲(20 人)和儿科医生(5 人)在就诊期间的对话进行了录音。对话片段通过定向内容分析分为儿科医生发起的指导、母亲发起的问题/疑虑或更新。儿科医生和母亲完成了关于对所提供指导的看法的调查。喂养分组包括引入固体食物/饮料、母乳/配方奶的量和时间、特定情况下的喂养以及母乳/配方奶的准备。生长分组包括适当生长和生长跟踪。不同家庭之间以及家庭内部在各次探访中讨论的具体主题存在很大差异。母亲们希望在引入固体食物(42.1%)和过敏原食物(31.6%)方面得到更多指导。儿科医生(80%)认为,在标准访视中提供的指导过多,在访视之外提供额外的指导将使照顾者受益。未来的研究应调查通过在儿童健康检查期间或之外提供额外指导来进一步支持家庭的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pediatrics
Clinical Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pediatrics (CLP) a peer-reviewed monthly journal, is a must read for the busy pediatrician. CLP contains state-of-the-art, accurate, concise and down-to earth information on practical, everyday child care topics whether they are clinical, scientific, behavioral, educational, or ethical.
期刊最新文献
Fever, Headache, and Runny Nose in an 8-Year-Old Girl. Safety and Treatment Outcomes of Infants and Children Treated With Daptomycin: Six-Year Experience From a Pediatric Academic Medical Center. Universal G6PD Screening: A Retrospective Chart Review. Applicability of the Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Test (PEI-TEST) in Pediatric Patients. Different Presentations of Invasive Streptococcus pyogenes Infections in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1