Sex and gender differences in health-related quality of life in individuals treated with incremental and conventional hemodialysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae273
Victoria J Riehl-Tonn, Jennifer M MacRae, Sandra M Dumanski, Meghan J Elliott, Neesh Pannu, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Kelsea Drall, Colleen Norris, Kara A Nerenberg, Louise Pilote, Hassan Behlouli, Taryn Gantar, Sofia B Ahmed
{"title":"Sex and gender differences in health-related quality of life in individuals treated with incremental and conventional hemodialysis.","authors":"Victoria J Riehl-Tonn, Jennifer M MacRae, Sandra M Dumanski, Meghan J Elliott, Neesh Pannu, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Kelsea Drall, Colleen Norris, Kara A Nerenberg, Louise Pilote, Hassan Behlouli, Taryn Gantar, Sofia B Ahmed","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women treated with hemodialysis report lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with men. Whether this is related to sex-specific (biological) (e.g. under-dialysis due to body composition differences) or gender-specific (sociocultural) factors (e.g. greater domestic/caregiver responsibilities for women) is unknown. We examined the association between sex assigned at birth, gender score and HRQoL in individuals initiating conventional and incremental hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective multi-center cohort study, incident adult hemodialysis patients were recruited between 1 June 2020 and 30 April 2022 in Alberta, Canada. Sex assigned at birth and gender identity were self-reported. Gender-related characteristics were assessed by self-administered questionnaire to derive a composite measure of gender. The primary outcome was change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores after 3 months of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were enrolled (conventional hemodialysis: 14 female, 19 male; incremental hemodialysis: 12 female, 15 male). PCS improved from baseline with conventional (<i>P </i>= .01) but not incremental (<i>P </i>= .52) hemodialysis in female participants. No difference in MCS was observed by hemodialysis type in female participants. Gender score was not associated with changes in PCS in female participants, irrespective of hemodialysis type. Higher gender score was associated with increased MCS with incremental (<i>P </i>= .04), but not conventional (<i>P </i>= .14), hemodialysis (<i>P </i>= .03 conventional vs incremental) in female participants. No change in PCS or MCS was seen in male participants, irrespective of hemodialysis type or gender score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this exploratory study, conventional hemodialysis was associated with improved PCS in female participants, while incremental hemodialysis was associated with improved MCS in female participants with more roles and responsibilities traditionally ascribed to women. Large prospective studies are required to further investigate these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 10","pages":"sfae273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women treated with hemodialysis report lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with men. Whether this is related to sex-specific (biological) (e.g. under-dialysis due to body composition differences) or gender-specific (sociocultural) factors (e.g. greater domestic/caregiver responsibilities for women) is unknown. We examined the association between sex assigned at birth, gender score and HRQoL in individuals initiating conventional and incremental hemodialysis.

Methods: In this prospective multi-center cohort study, incident adult hemodialysis patients were recruited between 1 June 2020 and 30 April 2022 in Alberta, Canada. Sex assigned at birth and gender identity were self-reported. Gender-related characteristics were assessed by self-administered questionnaire to derive a composite measure of gender. The primary outcome was change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores after 3 months of hemodialysis.

Results: Sixty participants were enrolled (conventional hemodialysis: 14 female, 19 male; incremental hemodialysis: 12 female, 15 male). PCS improved from baseline with conventional (= .01) but not incremental (= .52) hemodialysis in female participants. No difference in MCS was observed by hemodialysis type in female participants. Gender score was not associated with changes in PCS in female participants, irrespective of hemodialysis type. Higher gender score was associated with increased MCS with incremental (= .04), but not conventional (= .14), hemodialysis (= .03 conventional vs incremental) in female participants. No change in PCS or MCS was seen in male participants, irrespective of hemodialysis type or gender score.

Conclusion: In this exploratory study, conventional hemodialysis was associated with improved PCS in female participants, while incremental hemodialysis was associated with improved MCS in female participants with more roles and responsibilities traditionally ascribed to women. Large prospective studies are required to further investigate these relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增量血液透析和传统血液透析患者在健康相关生活质量方面的性别差异。
背景:与男性相比,接受血液透析治疗的女性的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)较低。这种情况是与性别特异性(生物学)因素(如身体成分差异导致的透析不足)有关,还是与性别特异性(社会文化)因素(如女性承担更多的家务/护理责任)有关,目前尚不清楚。我们研究了常规血液透析和增量血液透析患者的出生性别、性别得分和 HRQoL 之间的关系:在这项前瞻性多中心队列研究中,我们于 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日期间在加拿大艾伯塔省招募了成年血液透析患者。出生时的性别分配和性别认同均为自我报告。性别相关特征通过自填问卷进行评估,从而得出性别的综合测量结果。主要结果是血液透析 3 个月后肾脏疾病生活质量 36 身体(PCS)和精神(MCS)部分得分的变化:结果:60 名参与者(常规血液透析:14 名女性,19 名男性;递增血液透析:12 名女性,15 名男性)参加了研究。传统血液透析(P = .01)可改善女性参与者的 PCS 基线,而递增血液透析(P = .52)则无法改善 PCS 基线。在女性参与者中,血液透析类型对 MCS 没有影响。无论血液透析类型如何,性别得分与女性参与者 PCS 的变化无关。女性参与者的性别得分越高,血液透析增量型(P = .04)的 MCS 就越高,而传统型(P = .14)的 MCS 就越低(传统型与增量型相比,P = .03)。无论血液透析类型或性别得分如何,男性参与者的 PCS 或 MCS 均无变化:在这项探索性研究中,常规血液透析与女性参与者 PCS 的改善有关,而增量血液透析与传统上赋予女性更多角色和责任的女性参与者 MCS 的改善有关。需要进行大型前瞻性研究来进一步研究这些关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
期刊最新文献
Approaches to patients with obesity and CKD: focus on nutrition and surgery. GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with chronic kidney disease and either overweight or obesity. Guidelines for the management of hypertension in CKD patients: where do we stand in 2024? New approaches to acute kidney injury. Telemedicine in nephrology: future perspective and solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1