Roel Hoek, Sonia Borodzicz-Jazdzyk, Pepijn A van Diemen, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Ruben W de Winter, Ruurt A Jukema, Jos W R Twisk, Pieter G Raijmakers, Juhani Knuuti, Teemu Maaniitty, S Richard Underwood, Eike Nagel, Lourens F H J Robbers, Ahmet Demirkiran, Martin B von Bartheld, Roel S Driessen, Ibrahim Danad, Marco J W Götte, Paul Knaapen
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease.","authors":"Roel Hoek, Sonia Borodzicz-Jazdzyk, Pepijn A van Diemen, Yvemarie B O Somsen, Ruben W de Winter, Ruurt A Jukema, Jos W R Twisk, Pieter G Raijmakers, Juhani Knuuti, Teemu Maaniitty, S Richard Underwood, Eike Nagel, Lourens F H J Robbers, Ahmet Demirkiran, Martin B von Bartheld, Roel S Driessen, Ibrahim Danad, Marco J W Götte, Paul Knaapen","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jeae262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (QP-CMR) imaging has scarcely been evaluated in patients with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and new onset chest pain. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of automated QP-CMR for the detection of fractional flow reserve (FFR) defined hemodynamically significant CAD with visual assessment of first-pass stress perfusion CMR (v-CMR) and quantitative [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in a true head-to-head fashion in patients with prior CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This PACIFIC-2 substudy included 145 symptomatic chronic coronary symptom patients with prior myocardial infarction and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients underwent dual-sequence, single-bolus perfusion CMR, and [15O]H2O PET perfusion imaging followed by invasive coronary angiography with three-vessel FFR. Hemodynamically significant CAD was defined as an FFR ≤ 0.80. QP-CMR, v-CMR, and PET exhibited a sensitivity of 66, 67, and 80%, respectively, whereas specificity was 60, 62, and 63%. Sensitivity of QP-CMR was lower than that of PET (P = 0.015), whereas the specificity of QP-CMR and PET was comparable. Diagnostic accuracy and area under the curve of QP-CMR (64% and 0.66) was comparable to both v-CMR [66% (P = not significant [NS]) and 0.67 (P = NS)] and PET [74% (P = NS) and 0.78 (P = NS)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with prior myocardial infarction and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, the diagnostic performance of QP-CMR was comparable to visual assessment of first-pass stress perfusion CMR and quantitative [15O]H2O PET for the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD as defined by FFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12026,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"207-217"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae262","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: The diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (QP-CMR) imaging has scarcely been evaluated in patients with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and new onset chest pain. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of automated QP-CMR for the detection of fractional flow reserve (FFR) defined hemodynamically significant CAD with visual assessment of first-pass stress perfusion CMR (v-CMR) and quantitative [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in a true head-to-head fashion in patients with prior CAD.
Methods and results: This PACIFIC-2 substudy included 145 symptomatic chronic coronary symptom patients with prior myocardial infarction and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients underwent dual-sequence, single-bolus perfusion CMR, and [15O]H2O PET perfusion imaging followed by invasive coronary angiography with three-vessel FFR. Hemodynamically significant CAD was defined as an FFR ≤ 0.80. QP-CMR, v-CMR, and PET exhibited a sensitivity of 66, 67, and 80%, respectively, whereas specificity was 60, 62, and 63%. Sensitivity of QP-CMR was lower than that of PET (P = 0.015), whereas the specificity of QP-CMR and PET was comparable. Diagnostic accuracy and area under the curve of QP-CMR (64% and 0.66) was comparable to both v-CMR [66% (P = not significant [NS]) and 0.67 (P = NS)] and PET [74% (P = NS) and 0.78 (P = NS)].
Conclusion: In patients with prior myocardial infarction and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, the diagnostic performance of QP-CMR was comparable to visual assessment of first-pass stress perfusion CMR and quantitative [15O]H2O PET for the detection of hemodynamically significant CAD as defined by FFR.
期刊介绍：
European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging is a monthly international peer reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Imaging. It is an official publication of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.
The journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical from all areas of cardiovascular imaging including echocardiography, magnetic resonance, computed tomography, nuclear and invasive imaging. A range of article types will be considered, including original research, reviews, editorials, image focus, letters and recommendation papers from relevant groups of the European Society of Cardiology. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
