The Mortality of Politics: An American Paradox.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1159/000541912
Mark I Evans, Gregory F Ryan, David W Britt, Christian R Macedonia
{"title":"The Mortality of Politics: An American Paradox.","authors":"Mark I Evans, Gregory F Ryan, David W Britt, Christian R Macedonia","doi":"10.1159/000541912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The USA has the poorest health statistics of any high-income country. Political polarization has risen dramatically; newer safety net programs (the Affordable Care Act [ACA]) are unevenly provided because many Republican-leaning states refused expanded Federal coverage. Democratic programs have reduced physician leadership of medicine. Both have been deleterious. Here, we investigated associations among four key health measures two of which directly impact pregnancy outcomes and two that affect all patients by percentage of each state that voted for the Republican versus Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential election.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each state, we used public, non-partisan databases to assess the incidence of COVID, maternal, and infant mortality per 100,000 population and average life expectancy. Correlations among these four outcome variables and percentage Republican vote were calculated (r), contextualized by measuring associations with related variables including COVID vaccination rates, access to medical care, and incidences of heart disease, obesity, diabetes, gunshot deaths, and automotive fatalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COVID mortality, maternal and infant mortality, and life expectancy were highly correlated with percentage Republican (\"red\") vote per state. If \"red\" states had vaccination rates equivalent to Democratic-leaning (\"blue\") states, 72,000 deaths could have been avoided. Overall, \"red\" states have lower health metrics, reduced access to care, and higher comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The percent Republican vote was strongly associated, but not the whole answer, with worse health outcomes for multiple key measures of public health including mortality, access to care, and various comorbidities. Overall, the ACA has improved patient access to care but has also led to \"maternity care deserts\" disproportionately in rural areas in \"red\" states. Translating insurance coverage into improved care and outcomes requires further analysis and will require multi-pronged approaches including expanding coverage and incentivizing quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The USA has the poorest health statistics of any high-income country. Political polarization has risen dramatically; newer safety net programs (the Affordable Care Act [ACA]) are unevenly provided because many Republican-leaning states refused expanded Federal coverage. Democratic programs have reduced physician leadership of medicine. Both have been deleterious. Here, we investigated associations among four key health measures two of which directly impact pregnancy outcomes and two that affect all patients by percentage of each state that voted for the Republican versus Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential election.

Methods: For each state, we used public, non-partisan databases to assess the incidence of COVID, maternal, and infant mortality per 100,000 population and average life expectancy. Correlations among these four outcome variables and percentage Republican vote were calculated (r), contextualized by measuring associations with related variables including COVID vaccination rates, access to medical care, and incidences of heart disease, obesity, diabetes, gunshot deaths, and automotive fatalities.

Results: COVID mortality, maternal and infant mortality, and life expectancy were highly correlated with percentage Republican ("red") vote per state. If "red" states had vaccination rates equivalent to Democratic-leaning ("blue") states, 72,000 deaths could have been avoided. Overall, "red" states have lower health metrics, reduced access to care, and higher comorbidities.

Conclusion: The percent Republican vote was strongly associated, but not the whole answer, with worse health outcomes for multiple key measures of public health including mortality, access to care, and various comorbidities. Overall, the ACA has improved patient access to care but has also led to "maternity care deserts" disproportionately in rural areas in "red" states. Translating insurance coverage into improved care and outcomes requires further analysis and will require multi-pronged approaches including expanding coverage and incentivizing quality care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治的死亡:美国的悖论
导言:在所有高收入国家中,美国的健康统计数据最差。政治两极分化急剧加剧;较新的安全网计划(《平价医疗法案》[ACA])提供的医疗服务并不均衡,因为许多倾向于共和党的州拒绝扩大联邦保险的覆盖范围。民主党的计划削弱了医生对医疗的领导。两者都是有害的。在此,我们根据各州在 2020 年总统大选中投票支持共和党候选人和民主党候选人的比例,调查了四项关键健康指标之间的关联,其中两项直接影响妊娠结果,另外两项影响所有患者:对于每个州,我们使用非党派的公共数据库来评估每 10 万人中 COVID、孕产妇和婴儿死亡率的发生率以及平均预期寿命。我们计算了这四个结果变量与共和党选票百分比之间的相关性(r),并衡量了与相关变量(包括 COVID 疫苗接种率、获得医疗保健的机会以及心脏病、肥胖症、糖尿病、枪击死亡和汽车死亡事故的发生率)之间的关联:结果:COVID 死亡率、母婴死亡率和预期寿命与每个州的共和党("红色")选票百分比高度相关。如果 "红色 "州的疫苗接种率与民主党倾向州("蓝色")相当,则可避免 72,000 例死亡。总体而言,"红色 "州的健康指标较低,获得医疗服务的机会较少,合并症较多:结论:共和党选票的百分比与公共卫生的多个关键指标(包括死亡率、获得医疗服务的机会和各种合并症)的健康状况较差密切相关,但不是全部答案。总体而言,《医疗保险法》改善了患者获得医疗服务的机会,但也导致了 "红色 "州农村地区的 "孕产妇医疗荒漠"。将保险覆盖率转化为更好的护理和结果需要进一步分析,并需要多管齐下的方法,包括扩大覆盖率和激励优质护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Surface rendering of cross-sectional imaging and medical illustration for perinatal planning in conjoined twins. SPECKLE TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN TWIN PREGNANCIES AND THE ROLE OF GLOBAL LONGITUDINAL STRAIN AND PEAK SYSTOLIC STRAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in twin anaemia polycythaemia sequence donors. Cord occlusion in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a retrospective study of laser photocoagulation vs radiofrequency ablation. Added value in low-risk pregnancies of longitudinal changes in uterine Doppler and circulating angiogenic factors during the third trimester in predicting term preeclampsia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1