Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241278712
James Chapman, Shubhi Gupta, Zain Choudhary, Thomas Davies, Grace Airey, Lyndon Mason
{"title":"Is the Diagnosis of fifth Metatarsal Fracture Type Consistent? An Interobserver Reliability Study.","authors":"James Chapman, Shubhi Gupta, Zain Choudhary, Thomas Davies, Grace Airey, Lyndon Mason","doi":"10.1177/24730114241278712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment pathways of fifth metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with particular proximal fractures typically requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management. Our aim is to investigate the interobserver reliability of assessment of subtypes of fifth metatarsal fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all patients referred to our virtual fracture clinic with a suspected or confirmed fifth metatarsal fracture. Plain anteroposterior radiographs were reviewed by 2 novice observers, initially trained on the fifth metatarsal classification identification. Eight different zones were defined based on anatomical location. Patients were excluded from analysis if neither observer could identify a fracture. An interobserver reliability analysis using Cohen κ coefficient was carried out, and degree of observer agreement described using Landis and Koch's description. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS, version 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1360 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. The 2 observers had moderate agreement when identifying fractures in all zones, apart from zone 1.2 and distal metaphysis (DM) fractures, which only achieved fair agreement (κ = 0.308 and 0.381 respectively). Zone 3 has slight agreement with zone 2 proximally, and there is an apparent difficulty with distal diaphyseal shaft (DS) fractures, resulting in a lot of crossover with DM, achieving a fair level of agreement (DS 312 vs 196; DM 120 vs 237; κ = .398, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reliability of subcategorizing fifth metatarsal fractures using standardized instructions conveys moderate agreement in most cases. If the region of the fracture is going to be used in an algorithm to guide a management plan and clinical follow-up during a virtual clinic review, defining fractures of zones 1-3 needs careful consideration.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 3","pages":"24730114241278712"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241278712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment pathways of fifth metatarsal fractures are commonly directed based on fracture classification, with particular proximal fractures typically requiring closer observation and possibly more aggressive management. Our aim is to investigate the interobserver reliability of assessment of subtypes of fifth metatarsal fractures.

Methods: We included all patients referred to our virtual fracture clinic with a suspected or confirmed fifth metatarsal fracture. Plain anteroposterior radiographs were reviewed by 2 novice observers, initially trained on the fifth metatarsal classification identification. Eight different zones were defined based on anatomical location. Patients were excluded from analysis if neither observer could identify a fracture. An interobserver reliability analysis using Cohen κ coefficient was carried out, and degree of observer agreement described using Landis and Koch's description. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS, version 27.

Results: A total of 1360 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. The 2 observers had moderate agreement when identifying fractures in all zones, apart from zone 1.2 and distal metaphysis (DM) fractures, which only achieved fair agreement (κ = 0.308 and 0.381 respectively). Zone 3 has slight agreement with zone 2 proximally, and there is an apparent difficulty with distal diaphyseal shaft (DS) fractures, resulting in a lot of crossover with DM, achieving a fair level of agreement (DS 312 vs 196; DM 120 vs 237; κ = .398, P < .001).

Conclusion: Reliability of subcategorizing fifth metatarsal fractures using standardized instructions conveys moderate agreement in most cases. If the region of the fracture is going to be used in an algorithm to guide a management plan and clinical follow-up during a virtual clinic review, defining fractures of zones 1-3 needs careful consideration.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第五跖骨骨折类型诊断是否一致?一项观察者间可靠性研究。
背景:第五跖骨骨折的治疗路径通常以骨折分类为基础,特别是近端骨折通常需要更密切的观察,并可能需要更积极的治疗。我们的目的是研究第五跖骨骨折亚型评估的观察者间可靠性:我们将所有疑似或确诊第五跖骨骨折并转诊至虚拟骨折诊所的患者纳入研究范围。由两名经过第五跖骨分类鉴定初步培训的新手观察者对前正位平片进行复查。根据解剖位置定义了八个不同的区域。如果两位观察者都无法识别骨折,则将患者排除在分析之外。使用 Cohen κ 系数进行观察者间可靠性分析,并使用 Landis 和 Koch 的描述来描述观察者的一致程度。所有数据均使用 IBM SPSS 27 版本进行分析:共有 1360 名患者符合纳入标准。除了 1.2 区和远端干骺端 (DM) 骨折仅达到一般一致(κ = 0.308 和 0.381)外,两名观察者在识别所有区域的骨折时均达到中等一致。第 3 区与第 2 区在近端略有一致,而在远端干骺端轴(DS)骨折方面存在明显的困难,导致与 DM 有很多交叉,达到了相当程度的一致(DS 312 vs 196;DM 120 vs 237;κ = .398,P 结论:第 3 区与第 2 区在近端略有一致,而在远端干骺端轴(DS)骨折方面存在明显的困难,导致与 DM 有很多交叉,达到了相当程度的一致:在大多数情况下,使用标准化说明对第五跖骨骨折进行亚分类的可靠性达到了中等程度的一致。如果要在虚拟诊所复查中将骨折区域用于指导管理计划和临床随访的算法,则需要仔细考虑如何定义 1-3 区的骨折:证据等级:三级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
3D Analysis of Metatarsal Torsion by Computed Tomography in Normal, Hallux Valgus, and Hallux Rigidus Feet. A Retrospective Case Series of Single-Screw vs Dual-Screw Fixation for Treatment of Medial Malleolus Fractures. Long-term Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Reduction Quality in Posterior Malleolar Fractures Using a Modified Posteromedial Ankle Approach. Influence of Social Deprivation on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1