Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination on spinal block characteristics in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery - A randomised clinical trial.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_14_24
Annapureddy Sai Krishna, Jyotsna Agarwal, Samiksha Khanuja, Sandeep Kumar, Adam Khan, Khairat Mohammad Butt
{"title":"Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination on spinal block characteristics in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery - A randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Annapureddy Sai Krishna, Jyotsna Agarwal, Samiksha Khanuja, Sandeep Kumar, Adam Khan, Khairat Mohammad Butt","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_14_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>One major limitation of the spinal block remains the inability to extend the duration of the block intraoperatively unless planned before with spinal or epidural catheters and/or intrathecal additives. This study was designed to compare the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination infusion on spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised study was conducted in 60 patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group D (<i>n</i> = 30) (0.5 µg/kg of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine bolus followed by maintenance infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) and Group LKD (<i>n</i> = 30) (IV bolus of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.2 mg/kg of ketamine, followed by maintenance infusions of dexmedetomidine and ketamine at 0.5 µg/kg/h and 0.2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was maintained. The <i>t</i>-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare the parameters between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean sacral segment 1 (S1) regression time was 390.3 [standard deviation (SD):84.38] [95% confidence interval (CI): 360.13, 420.53] versus 393.23 (SD: 93.01) (95% CI: 363.04, 423.43) min in Group D versus Group LKD respectively ((<i>P</i> = 0.701). The number of episodes of hypotension was significantly higher in Group D (19 patients) compared to Group LKD (nine patients) (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Pre- and postoperative stress markers (24 h) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and shivering were comparable between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Tramadol requirement in the postoperative period was significantly less in Group LKD compared to Group D (<i>P</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The duration of S1 regression was similar between group dexmedetomidine (Group D) and group low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Group LKD).</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_14_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: One major limitation of the spinal block remains the inability to extend the duration of the block intraoperatively unless planned before with spinal or epidural catheters and/or intrathecal additives. This study was designed to compare the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination infusion on spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.

Methods: This randomised study was conducted in 60 patients scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into Group D (n = 30) (0.5 µg/kg of intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine bolus followed by maintenance infusion at 0.5 µg/kg/h) and Group LKD (n = 30) (IV bolus of 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine and 0.2 mg/kg of ketamine, followed by maintenance infusions of dexmedetomidine and ketamine at 0.5 µg/kg/h and 0.2 mg/kg/h, respectively). Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was maintained. The t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters between groups.

Results: The mean sacral segment 1 (S1) regression time was 390.3 [standard deviation (SD):84.38] [95% confidence interval (CI): 360.13, 420.53] versus 393.23 (SD: 93.01) (95% CI: 363.04, 423.43) min in Group D versus Group LKD respectively ((P = 0.701). The number of episodes of hypotension was significantly higher in Group D (19 patients) compared to Group LKD (nine patients) (P = 0.001). Pre- and postoperative stress markers (24 h) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and shivering were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). Tramadol requirement in the postoperative period was significantly less in Group LKD compared to Group D (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: The duration of S1 regression was similar between group dexmedetomidine (Group D) and group low-dose ketamine and dexmedetomidine (Group LKD).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射右美托咪定与氯胺酮-右美托咪定组合对下肢矫形手术患者脊柱阻滞特征的比较--随机临床试验。
背景和目的:脊髓阻滞的一个主要局限性仍然是无法在术中延长阻滞时间,除非事先计划使用脊髓或硬膜外导管和/或鞘内添加剂。本研究旨在比较静脉注射右美托咪定与低剂量氯胺酮-右美托咪定联合输注对下肢矫形手术脊髓麻醉的影响:这项随机研究针对 60 名计划在脊髓麻醉下进行单侧下肢手术的患者。患者被随机分为D组(n = 30)(静脉注射0.5微克/千克右美托咪定,然后以0.5微克/千克/小时的速度输注)和LKD组(n = 30)(静脉注射0.5微克/千克右美托咪定和0.2毫克/千克氯胺酮,然后以0.5微克/千克/小时和0.2毫克/千克/小时的速度输注右美托咪定和氯胺酮)。拉姆塞镇静量表评分维持在 3-4 分。组间参数比较采用t检验或Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U检验:结果:D组与LKD组的平均骶段1(S1)回归时间分别为390.3[标准差(SD):84.38][95%置信区间(CI):360.13, 420.53]分钟和393.23(SD:93.01)分钟(95% CI:363.04, 423.43)分钟(P = 0.701)。与 LKD 组(9 名患者)相比,D 组(19 名患者)发生低血压的次数明显较多(P = 0.001)。两组患者术前和术后应激指标(24 小时)以及术后恶心和颤抖的发生率相当(P > 0.05)。与D组相比,LKD组术后曲马多需求量明显减少(P = 0.003):结论:右美托咪定组(D组)与低剂量氯胺酮和右美托咪定组(LKD组)的S1消退持续时间相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
ABCs of anaesthesia private practice: Adapting, building and conquering. Anaesthetic management of a child with suspected Opitz-Kaveggia syndrome. Awake Seldinger technique-based tracheal intubation in near-total laryngeal obstruction. Bridging the pain gap after cancer surgery - Evaluating the feasibility of transitional pain service to prevent persistent postsurgical pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Challenges in central venous catheter placement due to thoracic venous anomaly in an infant - A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1