Uterine rupture following prostaglandins use in second trimester medical abortion: Fact or fiction? A systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15946
Antonio Malvasi, Andrea Tinelli, Vanessa Mulone, Ettore Cicinelli, Amerigo Vitagliano, Gianluca Raffaello Damiani, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Miriam Dellino, Antonio D'Amato, Antonella Vimercati
{"title":"Uterine rupture following prostaglandins use in second trimester medical abortion: Fact or fiction? A systematic review.","authors":"Antonio Malvasi, Andrea Tinelli, Vanessa Mulone, Ettore Cicinelli, Amerigo Vitagliano, Gianluca Raffaello Damiani, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Miriam Dellino, Antonio D'Amato, Antonella Vimercati","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostaglandins (PGs) have emerged as key drugs in second trimester medical abortion (STMA) and are currently a cornerstone in obstetric practice. Nevertheless, the application of PGs, integral to labor and abortion procedures, is not risk-free, and has been associated with several complications, particularly maternal fever and uterine rupture (UR).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main outcome of the present systematic review was to assess the safety of PGs use in STMA, particularly in scarred uterus (SC).</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We performed a comprehensive systematic review by searching multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, and the research registers of Web of Science during the years 1990-2022.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Only articles regarding cases of UR occurred after the use of PGs for STMA were included in the article. We excluded papers regarding UR during first trimester abortion induction of labor or pregnancy or unrelated to PGs use for STMA. Risk of bias was assessed employing a modified version of the \"Newcastle-Ottawa Scale\" (NOS).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>A total of 178 studies were initially identified as potentially meeting the criteria for inclusion in the review. After full text evaluation, 110 other articles were excluded and 67 studies that suited the inclusion criteria were included. A total of 19 of the included studies were judged to have a high risk of bias. Given the heterogeneous nature of the findings, we opted for a narrative synthesis of the results.</p><p><strong>Main results and conclusions: </strong>PGs appear to be an effective pharmacologic tool for STMA; however, their use is not entirely risk-free. STMA requires well-equipped obstetric centers with skilled clinicians and surgeons prepared for emergencies. Ultrasonographic scans should be routinely performed during STMA management, since a UR can also be silent during the induction of labor. Intrapartum transabdominal, transperineal, and transvaginal ultrasound may have the diagnostic potential to early recognize this obstetric emergency, to facilitate rapid medical and surgical treatment, improving the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prostaglandins (PGs) have emerged as key drugs in second trimester medical abortion (STMA) and are currently a cornerstone in obstetric practice. Nevertheless, the application of PGs, integral to labor and abortion procedures, is not risk-free, and has been associated with several complications, particularly maternal fever and uterine rupture (UR).

Objectives: The main outcome of the present systematic review was to assess the safety of PGs use in STMA, particularly in scarred uterus (SC).

Search strategy: The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We performed a comprehensive systematic review by searching multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, and the research registers of Web of Science during the years 1990-2022.

Selection criteria: Only articles regarding cases of UR occurred after the use of PGs for STMA were included in the article. We excluded papers regarding UR during first trimester abortion induction of labor or pregnancy or unrelated to PGs use for STMA. Risk of bias was assessed employing a modified version of the "Newcastle-Ottawa Scale" (NOS).

Data collection and analysis: A total of 178 studies were initially identified as potentially meeting the criteria for inclusion in the review. After full text evaluation, 110 other articles were excluded and 67 studies that suited the inclusion criteria were included. A total of 19 of the included studies were judged to have a high risk of bias. Given the heterogeneous nature of the findings, we opted for a narrative synthesis of the results.

Main results and conclusions: PGs appear to be an effective pharmacologic tool for STMA; however, their use is not entirely risk-free. STMA requires well-equipped obstetric centers with skilled clinicians and surgeons prepared for emergencies. Ultrasonographic scans should be routinely performed during STMA management, since a UR can also be silent during the induction of labor. Intrapartum transabdominal, transperineal, and transvaginal ultrasound may have the diagnostic potential to early recognize this obstetric emergency, to facilitate rapid medical and surgical treatment, improving the outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二孕期药物流产使用前列腺素后子宫破裂:事实还是虚构?系统综述。
背景:前列腺素(PGs)已成为第二孕期药物流产(STMA)的关键药物,目前是产科实践的基石。然而,作为分娩和人工流产过程中不可或缺的药物,前列腺素的应用并非没有风险,它与多种并发症有关,尤其是产妇发热和子宫破裂(UR):本系统性综述的主要结果是评估在 STMA 中使用 PGs 的安全性,尤其是在瘢痕子宫(SC)中:本综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们通过检索多个数据库进行了全面的系统综述,包括 1990-2022 年间的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Global Health、The Cochrane Library、Health Technology Assessment Database 和 Web of Science 的研究登记:文章只纳入了有关 STMA 使用 PGs 后发生 UR 病例的文章。我们排除了有关妊娠头三个月引产或妊娠期尿毒症的文章,或与 STMA 使用 PGs 无关的文章。采用 "纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表"(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale,NOS)的修订版对偏倚风险进行评估:初步确定共有 178 篇研究可能符合纳入综述的标准。经过全文评估,排除了 110 篇其他文章,纳入了 67 项符合纳入标准的研究。在纳入的研究中,共有 19 项被判定为存在高偏倚风险。鉴于研究结果的异质性,我们选择对结果进行叙述性综述:PGs 似乎是治疗 STMA 的有效药物工具,但使用 PGs 并非完全没有风险。STMA 需要设备齐全的产科中心,配备技术熟练的临床医生和外科医生,以应对紧急情况。在 STMA 的治疗过程中应常规进行超声波扫描,因为 UR 在引产过程中也可能是无声的。产前经腹部、经会阴和经阴道超声检查可能具有诊断潜力,可早期识别这种产科急症,以便于快速进行内科和外科治疗,改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncological safety of fertility preservation treatment in ovarian cancer: A Spanish multicenter study. Proposal for a new classification of intrauterine adhesions by sites. Retraction: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of a Cervical Traction Maneuver (Amr's Maneuver) on the Incidence of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Retracted: Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1