Kristin Nugent, Ricardo Viana, Michael W Payne, Janelle Unger, Susan W Hunter
{"title":"Understanding the multidimensionality of a concern for falling in people with unilateral transtibial amputation: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Kristin Nugent, Ricardo Viana, Michael W Payne, Janelle Unger, Susan W Hunter","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with lower limb loss often experience psychological concerns related to falling. A concern for falling (CFF) includes four subdomains: fear of falling, self-efficacy, consequences of falling, and perceptions of falls. Limited research exists on how these subdomains are influenced by clinical factors and falls history. This cross-sectional online survey evaluated: (1) associations among CFF outcome measures; (2) relationships between falls history and outcome measures; and (3) clinical and demographic factors related with outcome measures. Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years old, unilateral transtibial amputation and ambulating with a prosthesis. Eight measures assessed CFF: visual analog scale fear of falling, Modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Prosthetic Limb Users Survey - Mobility (PLUS-M), Locomotor Capabilities Index, Consequences of Falling Scale, and Perceived Ability to Manage Falls. Pearson bivariate correlation analysis assessed associations among outcome measures. T tests evaluated the association of falls status on outcome scores. Multiple linear regression modelled the clinical and demographic factors related to each measure. Sixty-eight adults (mean 61.8 ± 12.0) participated. Moderate statistically significant (P < 0.001) correlations were found across most outcome measures, with the strongest between PLUS-M and mSAFFE (r = -0.841), and ABC and FES-I (r = -0.821). Faller status was not associated with any measure (P > 0.05). Quality of life was associated with fear of falling, activity avoidance, self-efficacy, and certainty to managing falls (R2 ranged from 0.27 to 0.47). CFF should be evaluated independently of falls history.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People with lower limb loss often experience psychological concerns related to falling. A concern for falling (CFF) includes four subdomains: fear of falling, self-efficacy, consequences of falling, and perceptions of falls. Limited research exists on how these subdomains are influenced by clinical factors and falls history. This cross-sectional online survey evaluated: (1) associations among CFF outcome measures; (2) relationships between falls history and outcome measures; and (3) clinical and demographic factors related with outcome measures. Inclusion criteria: ≥18 years old, unilateral transtibial amputation and ambulating with a prosthesis. Eight measures assessed CFF: visual analog scale fear of falling, Modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Prosthetic Limb Users Survey - Mobility (PLUS-M), Locomotor Capabilities Index, Consequences of Falling Scale, and Perceived Ability to Manage Falls. Pearson bivariate correlation analysis assessed associations among outcome measures. T tests evaluated the association of falls status on outcome scores. Multiple linear regression modelled the clinical and demographic factors related to each measure. Sixty-eight adults (mean 61.8 ± 12.0) participated. Moderate statistically significant (P < 0.001) correlations were found across most outcome measures, with the strongest between PLUS-M and mSAFFE (r = -0.841), and ABC and FES-I (r = -0.821). Faller status was not associated with any measure (P > 0.05). Quality of life was associated with fear of falling, activity avoidance, self-efficacy, and certainty to managing falls (R2 ranged from 0.27 to 0.47). CFF should be evaluated independently of falls history.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.