Investigating premotor corticospinal excitability in fast and slow voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1152/jn.00330.2024
Daniel C Basile, Michael T Paris, Chris J McNeil, Charles L Rice
{"title":"Investigating premotor corticospinal excitability in fast and slow voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors.","authors":"Daniel C Basile, Michael T Paris, Chris J McNeil, Charles L Rice","doi":"10.1152/jn.00330.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases before a voluntary contraction; however, the relative contributions of premotor cortical and spinal mechanisms are poorly understood. It is unknown whether the intended voluntary contractile rate affects CSE. Eighteen young, healthy participants (9 females) completed isometric elbow flexion contractions targeting 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque, at either fast (fast as possible) or slow (25% MVC/s) contractile rates. Participants were cued to contract with warning (red) and \"GO\" (green) visual signals. Magnetic and electric stimulations were applied to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs), and M-waves, in the surface electromyogram (EMG) recorded over the biceps brachii. MEPs and CMEPs were collected at 0, 25, 50, and 75% of premotor reaction time (RT - defined as the time between the \"GO\" cue and onset of biceps brachii EMG) and compared with a resting baseline. MEP amplitude was greater than baseline at 75% RT (<i>P</i> = 0.009), and CMEP amplitude was significantly increased at all RT points relative to baseline (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). However, there were no differences in MEP and CMEP amplitudes when compared between fast and slow conditions (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.097). Normalized to the CMEP, there was no difference in MEP amplitude from baseline in either contractile condition (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.264). These results indicate that increased premotor CSE is a spinally mediated response. Furthermore, premotor CSE is not influenced by the intended voluntary contractile rate. CMEP amplitudes were larger for females than for males within the premotor RT period (<i>P</i> = 0.038), demonstrating that premotor spinal excitability responses may be influenced by sex.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The present study demonstrated that increased premotor (corticospinal excitability) CSE before initiating voluntary contractions is a spinally mediated response. The increase of premotor CSE was not different for fast and slow contractions, indicating that modulation of premotor CSE from a resting baseline is not specific to the intended contractile rate. Results also demonstrated a sex-based difference in premotor spinal excitability, potentially indicating greater neuromodulatory drive in females before initiating voluntary contractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1670-1679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00330.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases before a voluntary contraction; however, the relative contributions of premotor cortical and spinal mechanisms are poorly understood. It is unknown whether the intended voluntary contractile rate affects CSE. Eighteen young, healthy participants (9 females) completed isometric elbow flexion contractions targeting 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque, at either fast (fast as possible) or slow (25% MVC/s) contractile rates. Participants were cued to contract with warning (red) and "GO" (green) visual signals. Magnetic and electric stimulations were applied to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs), and M-waves, in the surface electromyogram (EMG) recorded over the biceps brachii. MEPs and CMEPs were collected at 0, 25, 50, and 75% of premotor reaction time (RT - defined as the time between the "GO" cue and onset of biceps brachii EMG) and compared with a resting baseline. MEP amplitude was greater than baseline at 75% RT (P = 0.009), and CMEP amplitude was significantly increased at all RT points relative to baseline (P ≤ 0.001). However, there were no differences in MEP and CMEP amplitudes when compared between fast and slow conditions (P ≥ 0.097). Normalized to the CMEP, there was no difference in MEP amplitude from baseline in either contractile condition (P ≥ 0.264). These results indicate that increased premotor CSE is a spinally mediated response. Furthermore, premotor CSE is not influenced by the intended voluntary contractile rate. CMEP amplitudes were larger for females than for males within the premotor RT period (P = 0.038), demonstrating that premotor spinal excitability responses may be influenced by sex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study demonstrated that increased premotor (corticospinal excitability) CSE before initiating voluntary contractions is a spinally mediated response. The increase of premotor CSE was not different for fast and slow contractions, indicating that modulation of premotor CSE from a resting baseline is not specific to the intended contractile rate. Results also demonstrated a sex-based difference in premotor spinal excitability, potentially indicating greater neuromodulatory drive in females before initiating voluntary contractions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究肘屈肌快速和慢速自主收缩时运动前皮质脊髓的兴奋性。
皮层脊髓兴奋性(CSE)在自主收缩前会增加;然而,人们对运动前皮层和脊髓机制的相对贡献知之甚少。人们还不知道预期的自主收缩率是否会影响 CSE。18 名年轻、健康的参与者(9 名女性)在快速(尽可能快)或慢速(25% MVC/s)收缩速率下完成了以 50% 最大自主收缩力矩为目标的肘关节屈伸等长收缩。参与者在收缩时会受到警告(红色)和 "开始"(绿色)视觉信号的提示。通过磁刺激和电刺激诱发运动诱发电位(MEPs)、颈髓诱发电位(CMEPs)和肱二头肌表面肌电图(EMG)中的 M 波。在 0、25、50 和 75% 运动前反应时间(RT,定义为 "GO "提示和肱二头肌肌电图开始之间的时间)收集 MEP 和 CMEP,并与静息基线进行比较。在 75% RT 时,MEP 振幅大于基线(p=0.009),相对于基线,CMEP 振幅在所有 RT 点均显著增加(p≤0.001)。然而,快速和慢速条件下的 MEP 和 CMEP 振幅比较没有差异(p≥0.097)。对 CMEP 进行归一化后,两种收缩条件下的 MEP 振幅与基线相比均无差异(p≥0.264)。这些结果表明,运动前 CSE 的增加是一种由脊髓介导的反应。此外,运动前 CSE 不受预期自主收缩率的影响。在运动前 RT 期间,女性的 CMEP 振幅大于男性(p=0.038),这表明运动前脊髓兴奋性反应可能受性别影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
Sensory and palatability coding of taste stimuli in cortex involves dynamic and asymmetric cortico-amygdalar interactions. Weight-bearing symmetry changes after asymmetric surface stiffness walking. Integrated approaches for investigating the neural bases of movement-highlights from the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement. A neural language for the cerebellum: control of behavior via competing populations of Purkinje cells. Brain oscillations and cardiovascular and metabolic profiles in lifespan population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1