Competence of Senior Otolaryngology Residents with the Bedside Head Impulse Test-Has There Been Improvement After 5 Years of Competency By Design?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/19160216241288817
Danny A Lelli, Ryan Rourke, Darren Tse
{"title":"Competence of Senior Otolaryngology Residents with the Bedside Head Impulse Test-Has There Been Improvement After 5 Years of Competency By Design?","authors":"Danny A Lelli, Ryan Rourke, Darren Tse","doi":"10.1177/19160216241288817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bedside head impulse test (bHIT) is a clinical method of assessing the vestibulo-ocular reflex. It is a critical component of the bedside assessment of dizzy patients and helps differentiate acute stroke from vestibular neuritis. A previous study on senior Otolaryngology residents showed poor competence in performing and interpreting the bHIT and called for specific evaluations in the Competency By Design (CBD) curriculum to remedy this. This study aimed to assess whether those competencies have improved after full implementation of CBD in residency programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty post-graduate year 4 Otolaryngology residents in Canada were evaluated on the use of the bHIT using a written multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination, interpretation of bHIT videos, and performance of a bHIT. Ratings of bHIT performance were completed by 2 expert examiners (DT, DL) using the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 6.7% (rater DT) and 20% (rater DL) of residents were found able to perform the bHIT independently. Inter-rater reliability was moderate (0.55, intraclass correlation). Mean scores were 70% (13.4% standard deviation) for video interpretation and 59% (20.6% standard deviation) for multiple-choice questions. Video interpretation scores did not correlate with bHIT ratings (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.11), but MCQs and bHIT ratings did correlate moderately (Pearson r = 0.52).Comparing to the prior study, residents performed worse on the bHIT (3.14 average score vs 3.64, <i>P</i> < .01) and fewer residents performed the bHIT independently (6.7% vs 22%-rater DT, 20% vs 39%-rater DL). Residents also performed worse on MCQs (58.7% vs 70.9%, P = 0.038), though similarly on video interpretation (70% vs 65%, <i>P</i> = .198).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fourth year OTL-HNS residents in Canada are not competent in performing the bHIT. These findings have implications for refining competency-based curricula in the evaluation of critical physical exam skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241288817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241288817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The bedside head impulse test (bHIT) is a clinical method of assessing the vestibulo-ocular reflex. It is a critical component of the bedside assessment of dizzy patients and helps differentiate acute stroke from vestibular neuritis. A previous study on senior Otolaryngology residents showed poor competence in performing and interpreting the bHIT and called for specific evaluations in the Competency By Design (CBD) curriculum to remedy this. This study aimed to assess whether those competencies have improved after full implementation of CBD in residency programs.

Methods: Thirty post-graduate year 4 Otolaryngology residents in Canada were evaluated on the use of the bHIT using a written multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination, interpretation of bHIT videos, and performance of a bHIT. Ratings of bHIT performance were completed by 2 expert examiners (DT, DL) using the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool.

Results: Only 6.7% (rater DT) and 20% (rater DL) of residents were found able to perform the bHIT independently. Inter-rater reliability was moderate (0.55, intraclass correlation). Mean scores were 70% (13.4% standard deviation) for video interpretation and 59% (20.6% standard deviation) for multiple-choice questions. Video interpretation scores did not correlate with bHIT ratings (Pearson r = 0.11), but MCQs and bHIT ratings did correlate moderately (Pearson r = 0.52).Comparing to the prior study, residents performed worse on the bHIT (3.14 average score vs 3.64, P < .01) and fewer residents performed the bHIT independently (6.7% vs 22%-rater DT, 20% vs 39%-rater DL). Residents also performed worse on MCQs (58.7% vs 70.9%, P = 0.038), though similarly on video interpretation (70% vs 65%, P = .198).

Conclusion: Fourth year OTL-HNS residents in Canada are not competent in performing the bHIT. These findings have implications for refining competency-based curricula in the evaluation of critical physical exam skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳鼻喉科高年级住院医师的床旁头部冲力测试能力--"设计能力 "5 年后是否有所提高?
背景:床旁头脉冲试验(bHIT)是一种评估前庭-眼反射的临床方法。它是对头晕患者进行床旁评估的重要组成部分,有助于区分急性中风和前庭神经炎。之前对耳鼻喉科高年级住院医师进行的一项研究显示,他们执行和解释 bHIT 的能力较差,因此要求在 "能力设计"(CBD)课程中进行具体评估,以弥补这一不足。本研究旨在评估在住院医师培训项目中全面实施 CBD 后,这些能力是否有所提高:方法: 对加拿大耳鼻喉科的 30 名研究生四年级住院医师进行了评估,评估内容包括 bHIT 的使用、多项选择题(MCQ)笔试、bHIT 视频解读和 bHIT 表演。两位专家考官(DT、DL)使用渥太华诊所评估工具对 bHIT 的表现进行评分:结果:只有 6.7% 的住院医师(DT 评委)和 20% 的住院医师(DL 评委)能够独立完成 bHIT。评分者之间的可靠性为中等(0.55,类内相关)。视频口译的平均得分率为 70%(标准差为 13.4%),多项选择题的平均得分率为 59%(标准差为 20.6%)。视频口译得分与 bHIT 评分无相关性(Pearson r = 0.11),但多选题与 bHIT 评分有一定相关性(Pearson r = 0.52)。与之前的研究相比,住院医师在 bHIT 中的表现较差(平均分 3.14 vs 3.64,P P = .198):结论:加拿大第四年的 OTL-HNS 住院医师无法胜任 bHIT。这些发现对完善以能力为基础的关键体格检查技能评估课程具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
期刊最新文献
A Descriptive Study of Quality of Life Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Central Vestibular Dysfunction in Head Injury. Does Managing Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Improve Their Depression Score? Prospective Study. IGF-1 Mediated Neuroprotective Effects of Olfactory-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Auditory Hair Cells. Potential Application of Hydrops MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1