Racial Disparities in Parturient Urine Drug Screening at a Texas Level IV Maternal Care Centre: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102679
Ivie Izekor BS , Steven Lindheim MD , Jessica C. Ehrig MD , Robert S. White MD, MS , Michael P. Hofkamp MD
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Parturient Urine Drug Screening at a Texas Level IV Maternal Care Centre: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study","authors":"Ivie Izekor BS ,&nbsp;Steven Lindheim MD ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Ehrig MD ,&nbsp;Robert S. White MD, MS ,&nbsp;Michael P. Hofkamp MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We hypothesized that Black or African American (hereby referred to as Black) and Hispanic patients would have higher rates of urine drug screening (UDS) during pregnancy compared with White or Caucasian (herby referred to as White) patients at our hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who delivered at our hospital between 1 December 2020 and 31 May 2021 and between 1 December 2022 and 31 May 2023 and who were Black, Hispanic, or White were included in the final analysis. We performed separate bivariate analyses comparing White patients to either Black patients or Hispanic patients. We performed a multivariate logistic regression, including variables of interest designed to predict risk factors for UDS during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 457 Black, 813 Hispanic, and 1252 White patients were identified. During pregnancy, 187 (40.9%) Black patients had UDS compared with 265 (21.2%) White patients (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In addition, 258 (31.7%) Hispanic patients had UDS during pregnancy, which was statistically different compared with White patients (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression found that identification as Black was independently associated with UDS during pregnancy (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.871; 95% CI 1.382–2.534, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), identification as Hispanic was not independently associated (aOR 1.177; 95% CI 0.900–1.538, <em>P</em> = 0.234), and patients who delivered after the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely to receive UDS (aOR 0.783; 95% CI 0.621–0.987, <em>P</em> = 0.039).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Identification as Black and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic were independently associated with increased adjusted odds of UDS during pregnancy at our hospital.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324005024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We hypothesized that Black or African American (hereby referred to as Black) and Hispanic patients would have higher rates of urine drug screening (UDS) during pregnancy compared with White or Caucasian (herby referred to as White) patients at our hospital.

Methods

Patients who delivered at our hospital between 1 December 2020 and 31 May 2021 and between 1 December 2022 and 31 May 2023 and who were Black, Hispanic, or White were included in the final analysis. We performed separate bivariate analyses comparing White patients to either Black patients or Hispanic patients. We performed a multivariate logistic regression, including variables of interest designed to predict risk factors for UDS during pregnancy.

Results

A total of 457 Black, 813 Hispanic, and 1252 White patients were identified. During pregnancy, 187 (40.9%) Black patients had UDS compared with 265 (21.2%) White patients (P < 0.001). In addition, 258 (31.7%) Hispanic patients had UDS during pregnancy, which was statistically different compared with White patients (P < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression found that identification as Black was independently associated with UDS during pregnancy (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.871; 95% CI 1.382–2.534, P < 0.001), identification as Hispanic was not independently associated (aOR 1.177; 95% CI 0.900–1.538, P = 0.234), and patients who delivered after the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely to receive UDS (aOR 0.783; 95% CI 0.621–0.987, P = 0.039).

Conclusion

Identification as Black and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic were independently associated with increased adjusted odds of UDS during pregnancy at our hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德克萨斯州一家四级孕产妇护理中心的产妇尿液药物筛查中的种族差异:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的:我们假设,与本医院的白人或高加索人(以下简称白人)患者相比,黑人或非裔美国人(以下简称黑人)和西班牙裔患者在怀孕期间的尿液药物筛查(UDS)率会更高。方法:在 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日以及 2022 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间在本医院分娩的黑人、西班牙裔或白人患者均纳入最终分析。我们分别对白人患者与黑人患者或西班牙裔患者进行了双变量分析。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,其中包括旨在预测妊娠期 UDS 风险因素的相关变量。258名(31.7%)西班牙裔患者在怀孕期间患有 UDS,与白人患者相比也存在统计学差异(P < 0.001)。多变量逻辑回归发现,黑人身份与孕期 UDS 独立相关(调整赔率比 [aOR] 1.871;95% CI 1.382,2.534;P < 0.001);识别为西班牙裔与此无关(aOR 1.177;95% CI 0.900,1.538;P = 0.234);COVID-19 大流行后分娩的患者接受 UDS 的可能性较低(aOR 0.783;95% CI 0.621,0.987;P = 0.039)。目的:我们假设,在本医院,黑人或非裔美国人患者(以下简称黑人患者)和西班牙裔患者在妊娠期间接受尿液毒理学筛查(UDS)的比例将高于白人或高加索人患者(以下简称白人患者)。方法:将 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 31 日或 2022 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间在本医院分娩的黑人、西班牙裔或白人患者纳入最终分析。我们分别对白人患者和黑人或西班牙裔患者进行了双变量分析。我们使用多变量逻辑回归和相关变量来预测妊娠期尿毒症的风险因素。结果:我们分别发现了 457 名、813 名和 1252 名黑人、西班牙裔和白人患者。其中,187 名黑人患者和 265 名白人患者在怀孕期间出现过妊娠期尿崩症(40.9% p r vs 21.2%; P < 0.001)。至于西班牙裔患者,有 258 人在怀孕期间接受了 DTU,比例为 31.7%,与白人患者相比也有显著的统计学差异(P < 0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,黑人患者身份与孕期UTD有独立关联(调整后的几率比 [aOR]:1.871;95% CI :1.382-2.534;P <0.001);西班牙裔患者与UTD无关(aOR:1.177;95% CI:0.900-1.538;P =0.234);COVID-19大流行后分娩的患者发生UTD的可能性较低(aOR:0.783;95% CI:0.621-0.987;P =0.039)。结论:在我们医院,黑人患者身份和在 COVID-19 大流行期间分娩与妊娠期UTD 调整后风险增加有独立关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
期刊最新文献
AN ILEAL MESENTERIC LEIOMYOMA - A RARE EXTRAUTERINE SITE. Higher Risk of Wound Complications but no Clinically Significant Increase in Operative Time for Smokers Receiving Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids. Indications for Transfer and Care Pathways of Inuit Transferred to a Tertiary Center for Childbirth in Quebec, Canada: A Retrospective Chart Review 2015-2019. Recognizing Endometrial Cancer Risks in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Experiences: insights from community qualitative interviews and workshop. Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1