Ivie Izekor BS , Steven Lindheim MD , Jessica C. Ehrig MD , Robert S. White MD, MS , Michael P. Hofkamp MD
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Parturient Urine Drug Screening at a Texas Level IV Maternal Care Centre: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study","authors":"Ivie Izekor BS , Steven Lindheim MD , Jessica C. Ehrig MD , Robert S. White MD, MS , Michael P. Hofkamp MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We hypothesized that Black or African American (hereby referred to as Black) and Hispanic patients would have higher rates of urine drug screening (UDS) during pregnancy compared with White or Caucasian (herby referred to as White) patients at our hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who delivered at our hospital between 1 December 2020 and 31 May 2021 and between 1 December 2022 and 31 May 2023 and who were Black, Hispanic, or White were included in the final analysis. We performed separate bivariate analyses comparing White patients to either Black patients or Hispanic patients. We performed a multivariate logistic regression, including variables of interest designed to predict risk factors for UDS during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 457 Black, 813 Hispanic, and 1252 White patients were identified. During pregnancy, 187 (40.9%) Black patients had UDS compared with 265 (21.2%) White patients (<em>P</em> < 0.001). In addition, 258 (31.7%) Hispanic patients had UDS during pregnancy, which was statistically different compared with White patients (<em>P</em> < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression found that identification as Black was independently associated with UDS during pregnancy (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.871; 95% CI 1.382–2.534, <em>P</em> < 0.001), identification as Hispanic was not independently associated (aOR 1.177; 95% CI 0.900–1.538, <em>P</em> = 0.234), and patients who delivered after the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely to receive UDS (aOR 0.783; 95% CI 0.621–0.987, <em>P</em> = 0.039).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Identification as Black and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic were independently associated with increased adjusted odds of UDS during pregnancy at our hospital.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324005024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We hypothesized that Black or African American (hereby referred to as Black) and Hispanic patients would have higher rates of urine drug screening (UDS) during pregnancy compared with White or Caucasian (herby referred to as White) patients at our hospital.
Methods
Patients who delivered at our hospital between 1 December 2020 and 31 May 2021 and between 1 December 2022 and 31 May 2023 and who were Black, Hispanic, or White were included in the final analysis. We performed separate bivariate analyses comparing White patients to either Black patients or Hispanic patients. We performed a multivariate logistic regression, including variables of interest designed to predict risk factors for UDS during pregnancy.
Results
A total of 457 Black, 813 Hispanic, and 1252 White patients were identified. During pregnancy, 187 (40.9%) Black patients had UDS compared with 265 (21.2%) White patients (P < 0.001). In addition, 258 (31.7%) Hispanic patients had UDS during pregnancy, which was statistically different compared with White patients (P < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression found that identification as Black was independently associated with UDS during pregnancy (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.871; 95% CI 1.382–2.534, P < 0.001), identification as Hispanic was not independently associated (aOR 1.177; 95% CI 0.900–1.538, P = 0.234), and patients who delivered after the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely to receive UDS (aOR 0.783; 95% CI 0.621–0.987, P = 0.039).
Conclusion
Identification as Black and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic were independently associated with increased adjusted odds of UDS during pregnancy at our hospital.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.