Predicting long-term mortality of patients with postoperative acute kidney injury following noncardiac general anesthesia surgery using machine learning.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.23876/j.krcp.24.106
Bo Yeon Choi, Wona Choi, Jiwon Min, Byung Ha Chung, Eun Sil Koh, Su Yeon Hong, Tae Hyun Ban, Yong Kyun Kim, Hye Eun Yoon, In Young Choi
{"title":"Predicting long-term mortality of patients with postoperative acute kidney injury following noncardiac general anesthesia surgery using machine learning.","authors":"Bo Yeon Choi, Wona Choi, Jiwon Min, Byung Ha Chung, Eun Sil Koh, Su Yeon Hong, Tae Hyun Ban, Yong Kyun Kim, Hye Eun Yoon, In Young Choi","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.24.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study addresses the gap in knowledge regarding the long-term mortality implications of postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) utilizing advanced machine learning techniques to predict outcomes more accurately than traditional statistical models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven institutions between March 2009 and December 2019. Machine learning models were developed to predict all-cause mortality of PO-AKI patients using 23 preoperative variables and one postoperative variable. Model performance was compared to a traditional statistical approach with Cox regression analysis. The concordance index was used as a predictive performance metric to compare prediction capabilities among different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 199,403 patients, 2,105 developed PO-AKI. During a median follow-up of 144 months (interquartile range, 99.61-170.71 months), 472 in-hospital deaths occurred. Subjects with PO-AKI had a significantly lower survival rate than those without PO-AKI (p < 0.001). For predicting mortality, the XGBoost with an accelerated failure time model had the highest concordance index (0.7521), followed by random survival forest (0.7371), multivariable Cox regression model (0.7318), survival support vector machine (0.7304), and gradient boosting (0.7277).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>XGBoost with an accelerated failure time model was developed in this study to predict long-term mortality associated with PO-AKI. Its performance was superior to conventional models. The application of machine learning techniques may offer a promising approach to predict mortality following PO-AKI more accurately, providing a basis for developing targeted interventions and clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.24.106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study addresses the gap in knowledge regarding the long-term mortality implications of postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) utilizing advanced machine learning techniques to predict outcomes more accurately than traditional statistical models.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven institutions between March 2009 and December 2019. Machine learning models were developed to predict all-cause mortality of PO-AKI patients using 23 preoperative variables and one postoperative variable. Model performance was compared to a traditional statistical approach with Cox regression analysis. The concordance index was used as a predictive performance metric to compare prediction capabilities among different models.

Results: Among 199,403 patients, 2,105 developed PO-AKI. During a median follow-up of 144 months (interquartile range, 99.61-170.71 months), 472 in-hospital deaths occurred. Subjects with PO-AKI had a significantly lower survival rate than those without PO-AKI (p < 0.001). For predicting mortality, the XGBoost with an accelerated failure time model had the highest concordance index (0.7521), followed by random survival forest (0.7371), multivariable Cox regression model (0.7318), survival support vector machine (0.7304), and gradient boosting (0.7277).

Conclusion: XGBoost with an accelerated failure time model was developed in this study to predict long-term mortality associated with PO-AKI. Its performance was superior to conventional models. The application of machine learning techniques may offer a promising approach to predict mortality following PO-AKI more accurately, providing a basis for developing targeted interventions and clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习预测非心脏全身麻醉手术后急性肾损伤患者的长期死亡率。
背景:本研究利用先进的机器学习技术,比传统统计模型更准确地预测术后急性肾损伤(PO-AKI)的结果,填补了有关术后急性肾损伤长期死亡率影响的知识空白:本研究利用先进的机器学习技术,比传统统计模型更准确地预测术后急性肾损伤(PO-AKI)的长期死亡率影响,填补了相关知识的空白:方法:利用 2009 年 3 月至 2019 年 12 月期间七家医疗机构的数据开展了一项回顾性队列研究。利用 23 个术前变量和 1 个术后变量开发了机器学习模型,用于预测 PO-AKI 患者的全因死亡率。将模型性能与传统的 Cox 回归分析统计方法进行了比较。将一致性指数作为预测性能指标,以比较不同模型的预测能力:结果:在 199,403 名患者中,2,105 人发生了 PO-AKI。中位随访时间为144个月(四分位间范围为99.61-170.71个月),有472例患者在院内死亡。患有 PO-AKI 的受试者存活率明显低于未患 PO-AKI 的受试者(P < 0.001)。在预测死亡率方面,加速衰竭时间的XGBoost模型的一致性指数最高(0.7521),其次是随机生存森林(0.7371)、多变量Cox回归模型(0.7318)、生存支持向量机(0.7304)和梯度提升(0.7277):本研究开发了带有加速衰竭时间模型的 XGBoost,用于预测与 PO-AKI 相关的长期死亡率。其性能优于传统模型。机器学习技术的应用为更准确地预测 PO-AKI 死亡率提供了一种可行的方法,为制定有针对性的干预措施和临床指南以改善患者预后提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
期刊最新文献
Safety of the reduced fixed dose of mycophenolate mofetil confirmed via therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Baseline characteristics and associated factors for hypertension in children with chronic kidney disease: results from the Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease study. A comprehensive review of Alport syndrome: definition, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic considerations. A noninvasive method of diagnosing membranous nephropathy using exosomes derived from urine. Artificial intelligence-powered chest computed tomography analysis unveils prognostic insights for COVID-19 mortality among prevalent hemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1