Candidemia Following Severe COVID-19 in Hospitalised and Critical Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.13798
Karan Srisurapanont, Bhoowit Lerttiendamrong, Tanaporn Meejun, Jaedvara Thanakitcharu, Kasama Manothummetha, Achitpol Thongkam, Nipat Chuleerarux, Anawin Sanguankeo, Lucy X Li, Surachai Leksuwankun, Nattapong Langsiri, Pattama Torvorapanit, Navaporn Worasilchai, Rongpong Plongla, Chatphatai Moonla, Saman Nematollahi, Olivia S Kates, Nitipong Permpalung
{"title":"Candidemia Following Severe COVID-19 in Hospitalised and Critical Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Karan Srisurapanont, Bhoowit Lerttiendamrong, Tanaporn Meejun, Jaedvara Thanakitcharu, Kasama Manothummetha, Achitpol Thongkam, Nipat Chuleerarux, Anawin Sanguankeo, Lucy X Li, Surachai Leksuwankun, Nattapong Langsiri, Pattama Torvorapanit, Navaporn Worasilchai, Rongpong Plongla, Chatphatai Moonla, Saman Nematollahi, Olivia S Kates, Nitipong Permpalung","doi":"10.1111/myc.13798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The epidemiology and clinical impact of COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC) remained uncertain, leaving gaps in understanding its prevalence, risk factors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase and Scopus for reports of CAC prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes up to June 18, 2024. The generalised linear mixed model was employed to determine the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk factors and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without CAC using the inverse variance method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 81 studies encompassing 29 countries and involving 351,268 patients, the global prevalence of CAC was 4.33% (95% Cl, 3.16%-5.90%) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In ICUs, the pooled prevalence of CAC in high-income countries was significantly higher than that of lower-middle-income countries (5.99% [95% Cl, 4.24%-8.40%] vs. 2.23% [95% Cl, 1.06%-4.61%], p = 0.02). Resistant Candida species, including C. auris, C. glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabratus) and C. krusei (Pichia kudriavzveii), constituted 2% of ICU cases. The mortality rate for CAC was 68.40% (95% Cl, 61.86%-74.28%) among ICU patients. Several risk factors were associated with CAC, including antibiotic use, central venous catheter placement, dialysis, mechanical ventilation, tocilizumab, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and total parenteral nutrition. Notably, the pooled odds ratio of tocilizumab was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.44-4.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of CAC is substantial in the ICU setting, particularly in high-income countries. Several risk factors associated with CAC were identified, including several that are modifiable, offering the opportunity to mitigate the risk of CAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"67 10","pages":"e13798"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The epidemiology and clinical impact of COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC) remained uncertain, leaving gaps in understanding its prevalence, risk factors and outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase and Scopus for reports of CAC prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes up to June 18, 2024. The generalised linear mixed model was employed to determine the prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk factors and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without CAC using the inverse variance method.

Results: From 81 studies encompassing 29 countries and involving 351,268 patients, the global prevalence of CAC was 4.33% (95% Cl, 3.16%-5.90%) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In ICUs, the pooled prevalence of CAC in high-income countries was significantly higher than that of lower-middle-income countries (5.99% [95% Cl, 4.24%-8.40%] vs. 2.23% [95% Cl, 1.06%-4.61%], p = 0.02). Resistant Candida species, including C. auris, C. glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabratus) and C. krusei (Pichia kudriavzveii), constituted 2% of ICU cases. The mortality rate for CAC was 68.40% (95% Cl, 61.86%-74.28%) among ICU patients. Several risk factors were associated with CAC, including antibiotic use, central venous catheter placement, dialysis, mechanical ventilation, tocilizumab, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and total parenteral nutrition. Notably, the pooled odds ratio of tocilizumab was 2.59 (95% CI, 1.44-4.65).

Conclusions: The prevalence of CAC is substantial in the ICU setting, particularly in high-income countries. Several risk factors associated with CAC were identified, including several that are modifiable, offering the opportunity to mitigate the risk of CAC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院和危重病人严重 COVID-19 后的念珠菌血症:系统回顾与元分析》。
理由:COVID-19相关念珠菌血症(CAC)的流行病学和临床影响仍不确定,在了解其流行率、风险因素和结果方面存在差距:方法:通过检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus,对截至2024年6月18日有关CAC流行率、风险因素和临床结果的报道进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。研究采用广义线性混合模型确定患病率和95%置信区间(CIs)。采用逆方差法比较了有 CAC 和无 CAC 患者的风险因素和临床结果:来自29个国家的81项研究共涉及351268名患者,重症监护病房(ICU)患者CAC的全球患病率为4.33%(95% Cl,3.16%-5.90%)。在重症监护病房中,高收入国家的 CAC 总患病率明显高于中低收入国家(5.99% [95% Cl, 4.24%-8.40%] vs. 2.23% [95% Cl, 1.06%-4.61%], p = 0.02)。耐药念珠菌包括念珠菌、光滑念珠菌(Nakaseomyces glabratus)和克鲁塞念珠菌(Pichia kudriavzveii),占 ICU 病例的 2%。ICU 患者的 CAC 死亡率为 68.40%(95% Cl,61.86%-74.28%)。多种风险因素与 CAC 相关,包括抗生素使用、中心静脉导管置入、透析、机械通气、妥西珠单抗、体外膜氧合和全肠外营养。值得注意的是,托西珠单抗的汇总几率比为2.59(95% CI,1.44-4.65):CAC在重症监护病房的发病率很高,尤其是在高收入国家。结论:在 ICU 环境中,CAC 的发病率很高,尤其是在高收入国家。发现了与 CAC 相关的几个风险因素,其中有几个是可以改变的,这为降低 CAC 风险提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
期刊最新文献
High-Resolution Melting Assay to Detect the Mutations That Cause the Y132F and G458S Substitutions at the ERG11 Gene Involved in Azole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis. First Reported Cases of Terbinafine-Resistant Trichophyton indotineae Isolates in Israel: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Response to Treatment. Multicentre Study of Candida parapsilosis Blood Isolates in Türkiye Highlights an Increasing Rate of Fluconazole Resistance and Emergence of Echinocandin and Multidrug Resistance. The In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin Against Uncommon Species of Candida. Detecting Echinocandin Resistance in C. glabrata Using Commercial Methods: Are CLSI or EUCAST Breakpoints Suitable for Categorical Classification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1