Thickness of the Orbital Septum in Comparison to Periorbita and Periosteum.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1097/IOP.0000000000002795
Hirohiko Kakizaki, Aric Vaidya, Munekazu Naito, Yasuhiro Takahashi
{"title":"Thickness of the Orbital Septum in Comparison to Periorbita and Periosteum.","authors":"Hirohiko Kakizaki, Aric Vaidya, Munekazu Naito, Yasuhiro Takahashi","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the thickness of the orbital septum in comparison to that of the periorbita and the periosteum of the frontal bone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Histological evaluation of 11 tissues around the upper arcus marginalis, including the orbital septum, periorbita, and periosteum of the frontal bone (5 right, 6 left) from 11 Japanese cadavers (age range: 63-91-year-old, average: 77.1, male: 5 cases and female: 6 cases) was performed. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and stained with Masson's trichrome. The thickness was measured at the 2 mm points from the center of the merging area of these 3 tissues (arcus marginalis). Statistical analyses in 3 groups were performed first with a one-way ANOVA and then with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Differences in ages or sexes were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The orbital septum showed similar thickness with the periosteum of the frontal bone ( p = 0.784), but was thicker than the periorbita ( p = 0.021). The periosteum of the frontal bone was found to be thicker than the periorbita ( p = 0.004). Differences between ages ( p = 0.315) or sexes ( p = 0.126) did not show statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thickness of the orbital septum was similar to the periosteum of the frontal bone, but was thicker than the periorbita at the 2 mm points from the center of the arcus marginalis. These showed some variation in each case, though. Ages or sexes did not influence the septum thickness after 60 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the thickness of the orbital septum in comparison to that of the periorbita and the periosteum of the frontal bone.

Methods: Histological evaluation of 11 tissues around the upper arcus marginalis, including the orbital septum, periorbita, and periosteum of the frontal bone (5 right, 6 left) from 11 Japanese cadavers (age range: 63-91-year-old, average: 77.1, male: 5 cases and female: 6 cases) was performed. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and stained with Masson's trichrome. The thickness was measured at the 2 mm points from the center of the merging area of these 3 tissues (arcus marginalis). Statistical analyses in 3 groups were performed first with a one-way ANOVA and then with Tukey's multiple comparison test. Differences in ages or sexes were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: The orbital septum showed similar thickness with the periosteum of the frontal bone ( p = 0.784), but was thicker than the periorbita ( p = 0.021). The periosteum of the frontal bone was found to be thicker than the periorbita ( p = 0.004). Differences between ages ( p = 0.315) or sexes ( p = 0.126) did not show statistical significance.

Conclusion: The thickness of the orbital septum was similar to the periosteum of the frontal bone, but was thicker than the periorbita at the 2 mm points from the center of the arcus marginalis. These showed some variation in each case, though. Ages or sexes did not influence the septum thickness after 60 years of age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼眶隔膜厚度与眼眶周围和骨膜的比较
材料和方法:对 11 具日本尸体(年龄范围:63-91 岁,平均:77.1 岁,男性 5 例,女性 6 例)上缘弧周围的 11 块组织进行组织学评估,包括眶隔、眶周和额骨骨膜(右侧 5 块,左侧 6 块)。标本在 10% 福尔马林中固定,并用马森三色染色。在距离这 3 块组织合并区(边缘弧)中心 2 毫米处测量厚度。3 组的统计分析首先采用单因素方差分析,然后采用 Tukey's 多重比较检验。年龄或性别差异采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较。显著性水平定为 0.05:结果:眶隔膜的厚度与额骨骨膜相似(P = 0.784),但比眶周骨更厚(P = 0.021)。额骨骨膜的厚度高于眶周骨膜(p = 0.004)。年龄(p = 0.315)或性别(p = 0.126)之间的差异没有统计学意义:结论:眶隔膜的厚度与额骨骨膜相似,但在距边缘弧中心 2 毫米处比眶周更厚。不过,每个病例的情况都有所不同。年龄或性别对 60 岁以后的鼻中隔厚度没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
期刊最新文献
Significant Changes of Corneal Astigmatism After Levator Muscle Surgery for Acquired Blepharoptosis. The Effect of Supine Versus Upright Positioning on Eyelid Height in the Nonsurgical Patient. The Effectiveness of Facial Exercise Therapy in Ophthalmic Complications of Facial Nerve Palsy and the CADS Grading Scale as an Ophthalmic-Specific Grading System. Ameloblastic Carcinoma With Orbital Invasion. An Analysis of Surgical Factors Associated With Clinically Significant Eyelid Edema (CSEE) in Patients Undergoing Blepharoplasty: Lid Crease Techniques Associated with CSEE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1