Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain Management in Pediatric Surgical Wards: An Educational Intervention Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.08.013
Anne-Lise Seipajærvi, Guro Reyes Simonsen, Frank Börner, Anja Hetland Smeland
{"title":"Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain Management in Pediatric Surgical Wards: An Educational Intervention Study.","authors":"Anne-Lise Seipajærvi, Guro Reyes Simonsen, Frank Börner, Anja Hetland Smeland","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric pain management is a constantly developing field. Despite extensive research, several studies have concluded that children's pain is still underestimated and undertreated. Nurses working with children have an important professional and ethical responsibility to possess up-to-date knowledge of pediatric pain management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management in pediatric surgical wards and to investigate the short- and long-term effects of a tailored educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study has a quasi-experimental design without a control group and uses a previously validated questionnaire, the Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain-Norwegian version (PNKAS-N). Nurses in four pediatric surgical wards in one university hospital in Norway answered the survey once before and three times after a tailored educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-three nurses answered the PNKAS-N at baseline (response rate of 75%). The nurse's total PNKAS-N mean score was 27.8 (77.3%) at baseline. We identified knowledge and attitude deficits regarding items related to opioid doses, the risk of drug addiction, the risk of respiratory depression, and the choice of pain medication for children. The total PNKAS-N mean score was statistically significantly increased after the intervention, at T2 (85.2%), as compared to baseline, and this improvement was sustained at T3 (83.8%) and T4 (81.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tailored educational intervention had a significant effect on nurses' knowledge and attitudes about pediatric pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.08.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric pain management is a constantly developing field. Despite extensive research, several studies have concluded that children's pain is still underestimated and undertreated. Nurses working with children have an important professional and ethical responsibility to possess up-to-date knowledge of pediatric pain management.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management in pediatric surgical wards and to investigate the short- and long-term effects of a tailored educational intervention.

Methods: This study has a quasi-experimental design without a control group and uses a previously validated questionnaire, the Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain-Norwegian version (PNKAS-N). Nurses in four pediatric surgical wards in one university hospital in Norway answered the survey once before and three times after a tailored educational intervention.

Results: Eighty-three nurses answered the PNKAS-N at baseline (response rate of 75%). The nurse's total PNKAS-N mean score was 27.8 (77.3%) at baseline. We identified knowledge and attitude deficits regarding items related to opioid doses, the risk of drug addiction, the risk of respiratory depression, and the choice of pain medication for children. The total PNKAS-N mean score was statistically significantly increased after the intervention, at T2 (85.2%), as compared to baseline, and this improvement was sustained at T3 (83.8%) and T4 (81.4%).

Conclusion: The tailored educational intervention had a significant effect on nurses' knowledge and attitudes about pediatric pain management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对儿科手术病房疼痛管理的认识和态度:教育干预研究。
背景:儿科疼痛治疗是一个不断发展的领域。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但一些研究得出结论认为,儿童疼痛仍然被低估和治疗不足。目的:本研究旨在确定护士对儿科手术病房疼痛管理的认识和态度,并调查量身定制的教育干预措施的短期和长期效果:本研究采用准实验设计,不设对照组,并使用了之前经过验证的调查问卷--儿科护士疼痛知识和态度调查挪威版(PNKAS-N)。挪威一所大学医院四个小儿外科病房的护士在接受量身定制的教育干预之前和之后各回答了一次和三次调查问卷:83名护士在基线时回答了PNKAS-N(回答率为75%)。基线时护士的 PNKAS-N 总平均分为 27.8 分(77.3%)。我们发现在阿片类药物剂量、药物成瘾风险、呼吸抑制风险以及儿童止痛药物选择等相关项目上存在知识和态度缺陷。干预后,PNKAS-N 平均总分在 T2(85.2%)与基线相比有显著提高,这种提高在 T3(83.8%)和 T4(81.4%)时得以持续:结论:量身定制的教育干预对护士的儿科疼痛管理知识和态度产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement. Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1