[Telemedical Interventions in Ambulant Psychotherapeutic Practices: Online Survey of Psychotherapists and Patients in Germany on the use of Digital Interventions in Psychotherapy].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2415-8817
Annika Kristin Alt, Annette Conzelmann, Anja Pascher, Jan Kühnhausen, Tobias J Renner
{"title":"[Telemedical Interventions in Ambulant Psychotherapeutic Practices: Online Survey of Psychotherapists and Patients in Germany on the use of Digital Interventions in Psychotherapy].","authors":"Annika Kristin Alt, Annette Conzelmann, Anja Pascher, Jan Kühnhausen, Tobias J Renner","doi":"10.1055/a-2415-8817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotherapy is going digital. The study investigated the usage behavior and acceptance of digital psychotherapy interventions among outpatient psychotherapists and patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>269 therapists and 157 patients answered questions in an online survey on the use and satisfaction of digital psychotherapy interventions (video therapy, apps, VR, sensor-based psychotherapy), affinity for technology, acceptance of technology, digital therapy relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants were satisfied with video therapy, stated that they used apps, VR, etc. less. Patients were more open, more tech-savvy and felt more competent in their use compared to therapists. Psychotherapists rated the digital therapeutic relationship better than patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of digital technologies in psychotherapy is not yet established in outpatient care. Measures to promote acceptance are necessary to break down barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2415-8817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychotherapy is going digital. The study investigated the usage behavior and acceptance of digital psychotherapy interventions among outpatient psychotherapists and patients.

Method: 269 therapists and 157 patients answered questions in an online survey on the use and satisfaction of digital psychotherapy interventions (video therapy, apps, VR, sensor-based psychotherapy), affinity for technology, acceptance of technology, digital therapy relationship.

Results: All participants were satisfied with video therapy, stated that they used apps, VR, etc. less. Patients were more open, more tech-savvy and felt more competent in their use compared to therapists. Psychotherapists rated the digital therapeutic relationship better than patients.

Discussion: The use of digital technologies in psychotherapy is not yet established in outpatient care. Measures to promote acceptance are necessary to break down barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[流动心理治疗实践中的远程医疗干预:德国心理治疗师和患者关于在心理治疗中使用数字干预的在线调查]。
背景介绍心理治疗正在走向数字化。本研究调查了门诊心理治疗师和患者对数字化心理治疗干预措施的使用行为和接受程度。方法:269 名治疗师和 157 名患者在一项在线调查中回答了有关数字化心理治疗干预措施(视频治疗、应用程序、VR、基于传感器的心理治疗)的使用情况和满意度、对技术的亲和力、对技术的接受程度、数字化治疗关系等问题:结果:所有参与者都对视频疗法感到满意,并表示他们较少使用应用程序、VR 等。与治疗师相比,患者更开放、更精通技术,并认为自己更有能力使用这些技术。心理治疗师对数字治疗关系的评价优于患者:讨论:数字技术在心理治疗中的应用在门诊治疗中尚未确立。有必要采取促进接受的措施来打破障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
期刊最新文献
[Institutionalised Pre-School Childcare and Reported Maltreatment: A Survey in East Germany]. [What does an Ideal Day Centre Look Like? The User Perspective on Day-Structuring Programmes for People with Mental Illness]. [Compensation for National Socialist Persecution as a Catalyst for a Paradigm Shift - A Contribution to the History of Psychiatry in the Early Federal Republic of Germany]. [IEHT vs. Regular Treatment - Are there Differences between the Two forms of Treatment in the Retrospective Course with regard to Individual Objective and Subjective Outcome Variables?] [Occupational Stressors and Resources of Peer Workers in Social Psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1