Anne D Zakrajsek, Lissy Kesterson, Marty O Visscher, Vivek Narendran, Orlando S Hoilett, Eric A Nauman
{"title":"Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation Nasal Mask Interface Pressure and the Inter-Individual Variation of Mask Placement.","authors":"Anne D Zakrajsek, Lissy Kesterson, Marty O Visscher, Vivek Narendran, Orlando S Hoilett, Eric A Nauman","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for CPAP as an alternative to mechanical ventilation for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress prompted a rapid shift to noninvasive respiratory support. Since most patients receive nasal bubble CPAP a concomitant increase in nasal pressure injuries followed. This prospective observational study aimed to develop strategies to reduce nasal mask pressure injury in neonates by (1) quantifying CPAP mask-interface pressure and (2) assessing placement variability. <b>Methods:</b> A micro-electromechanical systems pressure sensor was modified for contact pressure measurements with silicone embedding and calibrated. The CPAP generator and interface components were sized for a 24-week neonatal simulator. Thirteen neonatal ICU staff placed the simulator on CPAP at 6 cm H<sub>2</sub>O and 8 L/min of flow with no humidification. Pressure was measured at 3 locations (the forehead, nasal bridge, and philtrum) in triplicate (3 measurements/site). Descriptive statistics; a location-specific, one-way analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test; and a 2-sample paired <i>t</i> test of the means of the first and last triplicate were performed. <b>Results:</b> Pressure ranged from 12-377.3 mm Hg. The mean [SD] interface pressure at the philtrum was significantly higher than both the nasal bridge and the forehead (philtrum 173.9 [101.3], nasal bridge 67.8 [28.9], and forehead 79.0 [36.9], <i>P</i> < .001). CPAP fixation varied, including bonnet placement, trunk angle, mask compression, use of hook and loop extenders, and level of vigorous bubble feedback achieved. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study developed a modified pressure sensor for quantifying the pressure exerted by a nasal mask on facial skin. Maximum pressures were higher than those previously reported. Inter-individual differences were present in both quantitative and qualitative measures of pressure. Reduction of NIV-associated pressure injuries may be achieved through NIV fixation technique training and improved nasal mask stability and size increments.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for CPAP as an alternative to mechanical ventilation for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress prompted a rapid shift to noninvasive respiratory support. Since most patients receive nasal bubble CPAP a concomitant increase in nasal pressure injuries followed. This prospective observational study aimed to develop strategies to reduce nasal mask pressure injury in neonates by (1) quantifying CPAP mask-interface pressure and (2) assessing placement variability. Methods: A micro-electromechanical systems pressure sensor was modified for contact pressure measurements with silicone embedding and calibrated. The CPAP generator and interface components were sized for a 24-week neonatal simulator. Thirteen neonatal ICU staff placed the simulator on CPAP at 6 cm H2O and 8 L/min of flow with no humidification. Pressure was measured at 3 locations (the forehead, nasal bridge, and philtrum) in triplicate (3 measurements/site). Descriptive statistics; a location-specific, one-way analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test; and a 2-sample paired t test of the means of the first and last triplicate were performed. Results: Pressure ranged from 12-377.3 mm Hg. The mean [SD] interface pressure at the philtrum was significantly higher than both the nasal bridge and the forehead (philtrum 173.9 [101.3], nasal bridge 67.8 [28.9], and forehead 79.0 [36.9], P < .001). CPAP fixation varied, including bonnet placement, trunk angle, mask compression, use of hook and loop extenders, and level of vigorous bubble feedback achieved. Conclusions: This study developed a modified pressure sensor for quantifying the pressure exerted by a nasal mask on facial skin. Maximum pressures were higher than those previously reported. Inter-individual differences were present in both quantitative and qualitative measures of pressure. Reduction of NIV-associated pressure injuries may be achieved through NIV fixation technique training and improved nasal mask stability and size increments.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.