Challenges in Value Assessment for One-Time Gene Therapies for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Are We Turning a Blind Eye?

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.009
Jake Hitch, Tom Denee, Simon Brassel, Jennifer Lee, Michel Michaelides, Jacob Petersen, Sarah Alulis, Lotte Steuten
{"title":"Challenges in Value Assessment for One-Time Gene Therapies for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Are We Turning a Blind Eye?","authors":"Jake Hitch, Tom Denee, Simon Brassel, Jennifer Lee, Michel Michaelides, Jacob Petersen, Sarah Alulis, Lotte Steuten","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is a rare inherited retinal disease with no available treatment. Gene therapies in clinical trials will pose challenges for health technology assessment (HTA) if found to be safe and effective. We evaluated 2 of these challenges, namely acceptability and difficulties in assessing value beyond short-term patient health and healthcare savings and discounting in economic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative literature review on the socioeconomic burden of XLRP to identify relevant components of value for a hypothetical gene therapy from a societal perspective and to assess their relative importance. We compared the resulting value profile against the value frameworks of three European HTA agencies. We also reviewed their guidelines on discounting and potential discounting issues specific to XLRP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Much of the societal value of an XLRP gene therapy is likely to originate from productivity effects, carer spillovers, and value elements related to patient uncertainty. The evidence on these effects, however, is often limited, making it difficult for HTA agencies to assess them. Cost-effectiveness results are likely to be highly sensitive to the discount rate, and discounting will compound the effects of omitting important sources of value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have identified and detailed important components of societal value, key evidence gaps, and potential discounting issues for an XLRP gene therapy, which can inform future value assessments. Many of these may apply to gene therapies in other disease areas. Revisiting existing HTA approaches is recommended to ensure these are fit for purpose for such new classes of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is a rare inherited retinal disease with no available treatment. Gene therapies in clinical trials will pose challenges for health technology assessment (HTA) if found to be safe and effective. We evaluated 2 of these challenges, namely acceptability and difficulties in assessing value beyond short-term patient health and healthcare savings and discounting in economic evaluation.

Methods: We conducted a narrative literature review on the socioeconomic burden of XLRP to identify relevant components of value for a hypothetical gene therapy from a societal perspective and to assess their relative importance. We compared the resulting value profile against the value frameworks of three European HTA agencies. We also reviewed their guidelines on discounting and potential discounting issues specific to XLRP.

Results: Much of the societal value of an XLRP gene therapy is likely to originate from productivity effects, carer spillovers, and value elements related to patient uncertainty. The evidence on these effects, however, is often limited, making it difficult for HTA agencies to assess them. Cost-effectiveness results are likely to be highly sensitive to the discount rate, and discounting will compound the effects of omitting important sources of value.

Conclusions: We have identified and detailed important components of societal value, key evidence gaps, and potential discounting issues for an XLRP gene therapy, which can inform future value assessments. Many of these may apply to gene therapies in other disease areas. Revisiting existing HTA approaches is recommended to ensure these are fit for purpose for such new classes of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次性基因疗法治疗遗传性视网膜疾病的价值评估挑战:我们是否视而不见?
目的:X 连锁色素性视网膜炎(XLRP)是一种罕见的遗传性视网膜疾病,目前尚无治疗方法。临床试验中的基因疗法如果安全有效,将给 HTA 带来挑战。我们研究了其中的两个挑战,即在评估短期患者健康和医疗节省以外的价值时的可接受性和困难,以及经济评估中的贴现:方法:我们对 XLRP 的社会经济负担进行了叙述性文献综述,以从社会角度确定假设基因疗法的相关价值组成部分,并评估其相对重要性。我们将得出的价值概况与欧洲三家 HTA 机构的价值框架进行了比较。我们还审查了它们的折现准则以及 XLRP 特有的潜在折现问题:XLRP基因疗法的大部分社会价值可能来自于生产力效应、护理人员的溢出效应以及与患者不确定性相关的价值要素。然而,有关这些效应的证据往往很有限,因此 HTA 机构很难对其进行评估。成本效益结果很可能对贴现率高度敏感,而贴现将加剧忽略重要价值来源的影响:我们为 XLRP 基因疗法确定并详细说明了社会价值的重要组成部分、关键证据差距以及潜在的贴现问题,这些都可以为未来的价值评估提供参考。其中许多可能适用于其他疾病领域的基因疗法。建议重新审视现有的 HTA 方法,以确保这些方法适用于此类新的治疗类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Value Attribution for Combination Treatments: Two Potential Solutions for an Insoluble Problem. Evaluating the health and economic impacts of return-to-work interventions: a modelling study. Exploring social preferences for health and wellbeing across the digital divide. A qualitative investigation based on tasks taken from an online discrete choice experiment. Quantifying low-value care in Germany: An observational study using statutory health insurance data from 2018 to 2021. Indirect Costs of Alzheimer's Disease: Unpaid Caregiver Burden and Patient Productivity Loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1