Intelligent control of pressure based on ureteral access sheaths: renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscope perfusion at different sites.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urolithiasis Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01634-8
Huang Yongming, Kuang Jin, Huang Xin, Cheng Tie Dong, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin
{"title":"Intelligent control of pressure based on ureteral access sheaths: renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureteroscope perfusion at different sites.","authors":"Huang Yongming, Kuang Jin, Huang Xin, Cheng Tie Dong, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01634-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of renal pelvic pressure (RPP) control during flexible ureteroscopic perfusion at various sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Flexible ureteroscopy for the intelligent control of RPP was based on a ureteral access sheath (UAS) that integrated pressure measurement and suction functions (with automatic adjustment). Eleven consecutive patients with indurating nephrostomy tubes were enrolled. The nephrostomy tube was connected to a disposable invasive blood pressure sensor. The RPP was zeroed after the pressure stabilized. The flow rate and control value were set at 100 ml/min and - 5 mmHg, respectively. An 8.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope was irrigated at the renal pelvis, as well as the upper, middle, and lower calyces of the kidney for 1 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 11 patients with upper urinary tract calculi underwent successful UAS placement. Pressures measured by the sheath and fistula during perfusion were - 5.07 ± 1.41 and - 4.89 ± 1.07 mmHg at the renal pelvis, -5.16 ± 1.36 and - 5.12 ± 1.32 mmHg at the upper calyces, -4.98 ± 0.87 and - 5.39 ± 1.01 mmHg at the middle calyces, as well as -4.95 ± 1.56 and - 5.64 ± 1.24 mmHg at the lower calyces, respectively. There were no significant differences in pressure between the sheath and fistula groups or in sheath and fistula pressures among parts. The RPP fluctuated; however, all values were within the safe limit of 20 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UAS-based pressure monitoring technology can accurately and reliably monitor and control RPP within a set range.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01634-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of renal pelvic pressure (RPP) control during flexible ureteroscopic perfusion at various sites.

Methods: Flexible ureteroscopy for the intelligent control of RPP was based on a ureteral access sheath (UAS) that integrated pressure measurement and suction functions (with automatic adjustment). Eleven consecutive patients with indurating nephrostomy tubes were enrolled. The nephrostomy tube was connected to a disposable invasive blood pressure sensor. The RPP was zeroed after the pressure stabilized. The flow rate and control value were set at 100 ml/min and - 5 mmHg, respectively. An 8.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope was irrigated at the renal pelvis, as well as the upper, middle, and lower calyces of the kidney for 1 min.

Results: All 11 patients with upper urinary tract calculi underwent successful UAS placement. Pressures measured by the sheath and fistula during perfusion were - 5.07 ± 1.41 and - 4.89 ± 1.07 mmHg at the renal pelvis, -5.16 ± 1.36 and - 5.12 ± 1.32 mmHg at the upper calyces, -4.98 ± 0.87 and - 5.39 ± 1.01 mmHg at the middle calyces, as well as -4.95 ± 1.56 and - 5.64 ± 1.24 mmHg at the lower calyces, respectively. There were no significant differences in pressure between the sheath and fistula groups or in sheath and fistula pressures among parts. The RPP fluctuated; however, all values were within the safe limit of 20 mmHg.

Conclusion: The UAS-based pressure monitoring technology can accurately and reliably monitor and control RPP within a set range.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于输尿管通道鞘的压力智能控制:不同部位柔性输尿管镜灌注时的肾盂压力。
研究目的本研究旨在评估在不同部位进行柔性输尿管镜灌注时肾盂压力(RPP)控制的准确性和有效性:用于智能控制 RPP 的柔性输尿管镜基于输尿管接入鞘(UAS),该鞘集成了压力测量和抽吸功能(可自动调节)。11 名患者连续接受了肾造口术,他们的肾造口术管均未愈合。肾造瘘管与一次性有创血压传感器相连。压力稳定后,RPP 归零。流速和控制值分别设定为 100 毫升/分钟和 - 5 毫米汞柱。用 8.5 Fr 柔性输尿管镜冲洗肾盂、肾上盏、肾中盏和肾下盏 1 分钟:结果:11 名上尿路结石患者均成功置入了 UAS。灌注期间鞘管和瘘管测得的压力分别为:肾盂-5.07±1.41和-4.89±1.07 mmHg;上肾盏-5.16±1.36和-5.12±1.32 mmHg;中肾盏-4.98±0.87和-5.39±1.01 mmHg;下肾盏-4.95±1.56和-5.64±1.24 mmHg。鞘组和瘘管组之间的压力以及鞘组和瘘管组之间的压力没有明显差异。RPP有所波动,但所有数值都在20毫米汞柱的安全范围内:结论:基于 UAS 的压力监测技术可以准确可靠地监测并控制 RPP 在设定范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Association between the systemic inflammation response index and kidney stones in US adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007-2018. Comprehensive analysis and validation of TP73 as a biomarker for calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis using machine learning and in vivo and in vitro experiments. Quadruple-D score in the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones in pediatric population. Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group. Revealing the molecular landscape of calcium oxalate renal calculi utilizing a tree shrew model: a transcriptomic analysis of the kidney.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1