Chunming He, Tao Long, Huaiyu Zhou, Chuan Zeng, Peng Xiong, Xinyu Qiu, Haimin Song
{"title":"Traumatic Brain Injury Increasing Risk of Meningioma? From the Genetic Evidence.","authors":"Chunming He, Tao Long, Huaiyu Zhou, Chuan Zeng, Peng Xiong, Xinyu Qiu, Haimin Song","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous studies have demonstrated a strong association between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and an increased risk of meningioma. However, this correlation remains controversial. This study utilized Mendelian randomization to explore this relationship from the perspective of genetic evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed 6 TBI genome-wide association study datasets from the integrative epidemiology unit genome-wide association study database. Summary statistics for meningioma were sourced from the FinnGen R10 database. We assessed heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy within the analyzed data. The primary method was inverse variance weighting (IVW) to investigate the causal relationship between TBI and meningioma, excluding cases with horizontal pleiotropy. Four supplementary analysis methods were also used, with abnormal results excluded based on leave-one-out sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 6 Mendelian randomization analyses indicated no causal relationship between TBI and meningiomas (focal brain injury IVW P value = 0.98; diffuse brain injury IVW P value = 0.41; TBI without concussion IVW P value = 0.45; intracranial trauma IVW P value = 0.34; traumatic subdural hemorrhage IVW P value = 0.80; traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage IVW P value = 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Mendelian randomization study revealed that TBI does not increase the risk of meningioma based on genetic evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated a strong association between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and an increased risk of meningioma. However, this correlation remains controversial. This study utilized Mendelian randomization to explore this relationship from the perspective of genetic evidence.
Methods: We employed 6 TBI genome-wide association study datasets from the integrative epidemiology unit genome-wide association study database. Summary statistics for meningioma were sourced from the FinnGen R10 database. We assessed heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy within the analyzed data. The primary method was inverse variance weighting (IVW) to investigate the causal relationship between TBI and meningioma, excluding cases with horizontal pleiotropy. Four supplementary analysis methods were also used, with abnormal results excluded based on leave-one-out sensitivity analysis.
Results: All 6 Mendelian randomization analyses indicated no causal relationship between TBI and meningiomas (focal brain injury IVW P value = 0.98; diffuse brain injury IVW P value = 0.41; TBI without concussion IVW P value = 0.45; intracranial trauma IVW P value = 0.34; traumatic subdural hemorrhage IVW P value = 0.80; traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage IVW P value = 0.92).
Conclusions: The Mendelian randomization study revealed that TBI does not increase the risk of meningioma based on genetic evidence.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.