Intravenous indocyanine green to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05284-8
Enric Carbonell, Alba Sierra, Clàudia Mercader, Mònica Peradejordi, Maria Muní, Alberto Tello, Héctor Alfambra, Carmen Martínez, Tarek Ajami, Laura Izquierdo, Antoni Vilaseca, María José Ribal, Antonio Alcaraz, Raúl Martos, Mireia Musquera
{"title":"Intravenous indocyanine green to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.","authors":"Enric Carbonell, Alba Sierra, Clàudia Mercader, Mònica Peradejordi, Maria Muní, Alberto Tello, Héctor Alfambra, Carmen Martínez, Tarek Ajami, Laura Izquierdo, Antoni Vilaseca, María José Ribal, Antonio Alcaraz, Raúl Martos, Mireia Musquera","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05284-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study is to assess the role of indocyanine green (ICG) to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion and its impact on the incidence of benign ureteroenteric strictures (UES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent RARC for bladder cancer between 2018 and 2023. All patients included underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion with ileal conduit or neobladder. Bricker technique was performed in all ureteroenteric anastomosis. ICG was employed during the study period to evaluate ureteral vascularity. We divided patients into 2 groups depending on the utilization of ICG during surgery and compared demographic, clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes, including benign UES rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 221 patients that underwent RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Ileal conduit was performed in 173 (78.3%) patients and neobladder in 48 (21.7%) cases. A total of 142 (64.3%) and 79 (35.7%) patients were in the non-ICG and ICG group, respectively. With a median follow-up of the entire cohort of 21.1 months, there were no differences in the rate of benign UES after RARC between the non-ICG and the ICG group (p = 0.901). In the non-ICG group, 26 (18.3%) patients developed benign UES and in the ICG group 15 (19.0%) patients. Most of the strictures appeared in the left ureter in both groups (80.8% non-ICG vs. 66.7% ICG, p = 0.599). Median time to stricture diagnosis was 4 months (IQR 3-7.25) for the non-ICG and 3 months (IQR 2-5) for the ICG group (p = 0.091). The ICG group had a slightly greater length of ureter resected compared with the non-ICG group (1.5 vs. 1.3 cm, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our experience, choosing to use ICG intraoperatively to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity may not reduce the rate of benign UES after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and Bricker ureteroileal anastomosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05284-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study is to assess the role of indocyanine green (ICG) to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity during robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion and its impact on the incidence of benign ureteroenteric strictures (UES).

Methods: The study included patients who underwent RARC for bladder cancer between 2018 and 2023. All patients included underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion with ileal conduit or neobladder. Bricker technique was performed in all ureteroenteric anastomosis. ICG was employed during the study period to evaluate ureteral vascularity. We divided patients into 2 groups depending on the utilization of ICG during surgery and compared demographic, clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes, including benign UES rates.

Results: We identified 221 patients that underwent RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Ileal conduit was performed in 173 (78.3%) patients and neobladder in 48 (21.7%) cases. A total of 142 (64.3%) and 79 (35.7%) patients were in the non-ICG and ICG group, respectively. With a median follow-up of the entire cohort of 21.1 months, there were no differences in the rate of benign UES after RARC between the non-ICG and the ICG group (p = 0.901). In the non-ICG group, 26 (18.3%) patients developed benign UES and in the ICG group 15 (19.0%) patients. Most of the strictures appeared in the left ureter in both groups (80.8% non-ICG vs. 66.7% ICG, p = 0.599). Median time to stricture diagnosis was 4 months (IQR 3-7.25) for the non-ICG and 3 months (IQR 2-5) for the ICG group (p = 0.091). The ICG group had a slightly greater length of ureter resected compared with the non-ICG group (1.5 vs. 1.3 cm, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: In our experience, choosing to use ICG intraoperatively to evaluate distal ureteral vascularity may not reduce the rate of benign UES after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and Bricker ureteroileal anastomosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和体外尿流改道术中,通过静脉注射吲哚菁绿来评估输尿管远端血管情况。
目的:本研究旨在评估吲哚青绿(ICG)在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)与体外尿流改道期间评估输尿管远端血管的作用及其对良性输尿管肠管狭窄(UES)发生率的影响:研究纳入了2018年至2023年间因膀胱癌接受RARC手术的患者。所有纳入患者均接受了回肠导管或新膀胱的体外尿流改道术。所有输尿管肠吻合术均采用 Bricker 技术。研究期间使用 ICG 评估输尿管血管情况。我们根据手术中使用 ICG 的情况将患者分为两组,并比较了人口统计学、临床病理学和围手术期结果,包括良性 UES 的发生率:结果:我们确定了221名接受RARC和体外尿流改道手术的患者。173例(78.3%)患者接受了回肠导尿术,48例(21.7%)患者接受了新膀胱术。非 ICG 组和 ICG 组分别有 142 例(64.3%)和 79 例(35.7%)患者。整个组群的中位随访时间为 21.1 个月,非 ICG 组和 ICG 组的 RARC 后良性 UES 发生率没有差异(p = 0.901)。在非 ICG 组中,26 例(18.3%)患者出现良性 UES,而在 ICG 组中,15 例(19.0%)患者出现良性 UES。两组患者的大部分狭窄都出现在左侧输尿管(非ICG组80.8%,ICG组66.7%,P = 0.599)。非 ICG 组诊断出狭窄的中位时间为 4 个月(IQR 3-7.25),ICG 组为 3 个月(IQR 2-5)(p = 0.091)。ICG组切除的输尿管长度略大于非ICG组(1.5 vs. 1.3 cm,p = 0.007):根据我们的经验,选择在术中使用ICG来评估输尿管远端血管情况可能不会降低机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术体外尿流改道和Bricker输尿管静脉吻合术后的良性UES发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Does size matter? Comparison of miniaturized (22 Fr) versus standard (26 Fr) instruments in pulsed thulium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. Thermal injury and treatment efficiency during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: insights from an in vivo porcine model. Real-world outcomes of bladder-sparing strategies for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter study. Prospective single-center study comparing RealPulse® Thulium:YAG and Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. Nocturia: when the heart wakes you up at night.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1