[Comparison of the accuracy and safety of robot-and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery].

H P Zhang, D J Hao, B R He, H H Sun, Z W Xu, B Wang, Y C Duan, W L Yang, Z L Gao, C J Kou
{"title":"[Comparison of the accuracy and safety of robot-and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery].","authors":"H P Zhang, D J Hao, B R He, H H Sun, Z W Xu, B Wang, Y C Duan, W L Yang, Z L Gao, C J Kou","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240329-00722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 49 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation treated consecutively at the Honghui Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from April 2022 to December 2023. Among them, 27 were male and 22 were female, aged (44.2±11.7) years. Based on the date of surgery, 29 patients (from April 2022 to April 2023) received the S8 navigation-assisted screw placement (navigation group), 20 patients (from May to December 2023) received Mazor robot-assisted screw placement (robot group). The accuracy of screw placement, screw placement time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain were adopted to evaluate the recovery of cervical spinal cord function and cervical and shoulder pain at preoperative period and 3-month follow-up, and the occurrence of complications was observed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 196 screws were inserted in 49 patients. In the navigation-assisted group, a total of 116 screws were inserted with an accuracy rate of 93.1% (108/116); in contrast, in the robot-assisted group, a total of 80 screws were inserted with an accuracy rate of 97.5% (78/80) (<i>P</i>=0.040). The mean screw placement time, operation time, and blood loss in the navigation-assisted group were all significantly lower than those in the robot-assisted group [(37.8±3.4)min vs (48.4±4.6)min, (127.7±15.3)min vs (165.7±12.1)min and (205.8±13.6)ml vs (290.6±11.2) ml, respectively all <i>P</i><0.01]. One case experienced intraoperative venous plexus injury in the robot-assisted group. Postoperatively, all patients experienced significant relief in neck pain symptoms, and neurological symptoms recovered to varying degrees. The VAS and JOA scores at 3 months post-surgery for both groups showed statistically significant improvements compared to pre-surgery (all <i>P</i><0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Both robot-assisted and navigation-assisted screw placement show high accuracy and safety in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery. Compared to navigation, robot assistance increases the surgical time and blood loss, but significantly improves the accuracy of screw placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240329-00722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 49 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation treated consecutively at the Honghui Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from April 2022 to December 2023. Among them, 27 were male and 22 were female, aged (44.2±11.7) years. Based on the date of surgery, 29 patients (from April 2022 to April 2023) received the S8 navigation-assisted screw placement (navigation group), 20 patients (from May to December 2023) received Mazor robot-assisted screw placement (robot group). The accuracy of screw placement, screw placement time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain were adopted to evaluate the recovery of cervical spinal cord function and cervical and shoulder pain at preoperative period and 3-month follow-up, and the occurrence of complications was observed. Results: A total of 196 screws were inserted in 49 patients. In the navigation-assisted group, a total of 116 screws were inserted with an accuracy rate of 93.1% (108/116); in contrast, in the robot-assisted group, a total of 80 screws were inserted with an accuracy rate of 97.5% (78/80) (P=0.040). The mean screw placement time, operation time, and blood loss in the navigation-assisted group were all significantly lower than those in the robot-assisted group [(37.8±3.4)min vs (48.4±4.6)min, (127.7±15.3)min vs (165.7±12.1)min and (205.8±13.6)ml vs (290.6±11.2) ml, respectively all P<0.01]. One case experienced intraoperative venous plexus injury in the robot-assisted group. Postoperatively, all patients experienced significant relief in neck pain symptoms, and neurological symptoms recovered to varying degrees. The VAS and JOA scores at 3 months post-surgery for both groups showed statistically significant improvements compared to pre-surgery (all P<0.01), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Both robot-assisted and navigation-assisted screw placement show high accuracy and safety in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery. Compared to navigation, robot assistance increases the surgical time and blood loss, but significantly improves the accuracy of screw placement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[寰枢椎脱位手术中机器人和导航辅助螺钉置入的准确性和安全性比较]。
目的比较寰枢椎脱位手术中机器人辅助和导航辅助螺钉置入的准确性和安全性。方法: 对 49 名寰枢关节脱位患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析:回顾性分析2022年4月至2023年12月在西安交通大学红会医院连续接受治疗的49例寰枢关节脱位患者的临床资料。其中男性27例,女性22例,年龄(44.2±11.7)岁。根据手术日期,29例患者(2022年4月至2023年4月)接受S8导航辅助螺钉置入术(导航组),20例患者(2023年5月至12月)接受Mazor机器人辅助螺钉置入术(机器人组)。记录并比较了两组患者的螺钉置入准确性、螺钉置入时间、手术时间、术中失血量以及术中并发症。采用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分来评估术前和3个月随访时颈椎脊髓功能恢复情况和颈肩疼痛情况,并观察并发症的发生情况。结果49名患者共植入196枚螺钉。导航辅助组共植入 116 颗螺钉,准确率为 93.1%(108/116);相比之下,机器人辅助组共植入 80 颗螺钉,准确率为 97.5%(78/80)(P=0.040)。导航辅助组的平均螺钉置入时间、手术时间和失血量均显著低于机器人辅助组[分别为(37.8±3.4)分钟 vs (48.4±4.6)分钟、(127.7±15.3)分钟 vs (165.7±12.1)分钟和(205.8±13.6)毫升 vs (290.6±11.2)毫升,均PPP>0.05]。结论在寰枢椎脱位手术中,机器人辅助和导航辅助螺钉置入均显示出较高的准确性和安全性。与导航相比,机器人辅助增加了手术时间和失血量,但显著提高了螺钉置入的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[Accuracy and efficiency of 2D/3D single-vertebra spine navigation registration method based on dual-view feature fusion]. [Analysis of the accuracy between orthopedic robot-assisted and traditional manual pedicle screw placement techniques in adult degenerative scoliosis posterior surgery]. [Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of spinal cord glioma]. [Comparison of the accuracy and safety of robot-and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery]. [Correlation and predictive value analysis of iliac artery calcification score and restenosis of lower extremity arteries after drug-coated balloon combined with stent implantation in patients with lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusive disease].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1