How Time, Living Situation, and Stress Related to Technology Influence User Acceptance and Usability of a Socialization Service for Older Adults and Their Formal and Informal Caregivers: Six-Month Pilot Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.2196/54736
Jasmine Pani, Letizia Lorusso, Lara Toccafondi, Grazia D'Onofrio, Filomena Ciccone, Sergio Russo, Francesco Giuliani, Daniele Sancarlo, Novella Calamida, Gianna Vignani, Tarmo Pihl, Erika Rovini, Filippo Cavallo, Laura Fiorini
{"title":"How Time, Living Situation, and Stress Related to Technology Influence User Acceptance and Usability of a Socialization Service for Older Adults and Their Formal and Informal Caregivers: Six-Month Pilot Study.","authors":"Jasmine Pani, Letizia Lorusso, Lara Toccafondi, Grazia D'Onofrio, Filomena Ciccone, Sergio Russo, Francesco Giuliani, Daniele Sancarlo, Novella Calamida, Gianna Vignani, Tarmo Pihl, Erika Rovini, Filippo Cavallo, Laura Fiorini","doi":"10.2196/54736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the growing population of older adults, addressing the influence of loneliness among this demographic group has become imperative, especially due to the link between social isolation and deterioration of mental and physical well-being. Technology has the potential to be used to create innovative solutions to increase socialization and potentially promote healthy aging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This 6-month study examined the usability and acceptability of a technology-based socialization service and explored how stress and living situation affect older adults' and their ecosystem's perceptions of technology, investigating cross-sectional and longitudinal differences among and across user groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited in Tuscany and Apulia (Italy) through a network of social cooperatives and a research hospital, respectively. A total of 20 older adults were provided with the same technology installed on a tablet and on a smart television. The technology has three functionalities: video calling, playing games, and sharing news. Additionally, 20 informal caregivers (IC) and 13 formal caregivers (FC) connected to the older adults were included in the study. After both initial training in the use of the system (T0) and 6 months of using the system (T6), questionnaires on usability, acceptability, and technostress were filled in by older adults, IC, and FC. Nonparametric or parametric tests were conducted to investigate group differences at both time points and changes over time. Additional analyses on older adults were done to assess whether differences in usability and acceptability were related to living situation (ie, alone or with someone). Furthermore, correlation analyses were performed between usability, acceptability, and stress toward technology at T0 and T6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At both T0 and T6, older adults had lower usability scores than IC and FC and higher anxiety than IC. Over time, there was a significant decrease in older adults' attitudes toward technology score, depicting a negative attitude over time (T0 median 4.2, IQR 0.5; T6 median 3.7, IQR 0.8; Cohen d=0.7), while there was no change for IC and FC. At T0, those living alone had lower acceptability than those living with someone but this difference disappeared at T6. People or participants living with someone had a decline in anxiety, attitudes toward technology, enjoyment, and perceived usefulness. Stress toward technology affected usability and acceptability in the older adult group entering the study (ρ=-.85) but this was not observed after 6 months. In the IC group, stress affected trust at T0 (ρ=-.23) but not at T6.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the start of the study, older adults judged the system to be less usable and more stressful than did the caregivers. Indeed, at first, technostress was correlated with usability and acceptability; however, with repeated use, technostress did not influence the perception of technology. Overall, getting accustomed to technology decreased anxiety and stress toward technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e54736"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the growing population of older adults, addressing the influence of loneliness among this demographic group has become imperative, especially due to the link between social isolation and deterioration of mental and physical well-being. Technology has the potential to be used to create innovative solutions to increase socialization and potentially promote healthy aging.

Objective: This 6-month study examined the usability and acceptability of a technology-based socialization service and explored how stress and living situation affect older adults' and their ecosystem's perceptions of technology, investigating cross-sectional and longitudinal differences among and across user groups.

Methods: Participants were recruited in Tuscany and Apulia (Italy) through a network of social cooperatives and a research hospital, respectively. A total of 20 older adults were provided with the same technology installed on a tablet and on a smart television. The technology has three functionalities: video calling, playing games, and sharing news. Additionally, 20 informal caregivers (IC) and 13 formal caregivers (FC) connected to the older adults were included in the study. After both initial training in the use of the system (T0) and 6 months of using the system (T6), questionnaires on usability, acceptability, and technostress were filled in by older adults, IC, and FC. Nonparametric or parametric tests were conducted to investigate group differences at both time points and changes over time. Additional analyses on older adults were done to assess whether differences in usability and acceptability were related to living situation (ie, alone or with someone). Furthermore, correlation analyses were performed between usability, acceptability, and stress toward technology at T0 and T6.

Results: At both T0 and T6, older adults had lower usability scores than IC and FC and higher anxiety than IC. Over time, there was a significant decrease in older adults' attitudes toward technology score, depicting a negative attitude over time (T0 median 4.2, IQR 0.5; T6 median 3.7, IQR 0.8; Cohen d=0.7), while there was no change for IC and FC. At T0, those living alone had lower acceptability than those living with someone but this difference disappeared at T6. People or participants living with someone had a decline in anxiety, attitudes toward technology, enjoyment, and perceived usefulness. Stress toward technology affected usability and acceptability in the older adult group entering the study (ρ=-.85) but this was not observed after 6 months. In the IC group, stress affected trust at T0 (ρ=-.23) but not at T6.

Conclusions: At the start of the study, older adults judged the system to be less usable and more stressful than did the caregivers. Indeed, at first, technostress was correlated with usability and acceptability; however, with repeated use, technostress did not influence the perception of technology. Overall, getting accustomed to technology decreased anxiety and stress toward technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
时间、生活环境以及与技术相关的压力如何影响用户对面向老年人及其正式和非正式照顾者的社交服务的接受度和可用性:为期六个月的试点研究。
背景:考虑到老年人口的不断增长,解决孤独对这一人口群体的影响已成为当务之急,特别是由于社会隔离与身心健康恶化之间存在联系。技术有可能被用来创造创新的解决方案,以增加社交,并有可能促进健康的老龄化:这项为期 6 个月的研究考察了以技术为基础的社交服务的可用性和可接受性,并探讨了压力和生活状况如何影响老年人及其生态系统对技术的看法,调查了用户群体之间的横向和纵向差异:方法:分别在意大利托斯卡纳和阿普利亚通过社会合作社网络和一家研究医院招募参与者。共向 20 名老年人提供了安装在平板电脑和智能电视上的相同技术。该技术有三种功能:视频通话、玩游戏和分享新闻。此外,20 名非正式护理人员(IC)和 13 名正式护理人员(FC)也参与了研究。在系统使用的初始培训(T0)和使用 6 个月后(T6),老年人、非正式护理人员和正式护理人员填写了关于可用性、可接受性和技术压力的调查问卷。通过非参数检验或参数检验来研究两个时间点的组间差异和随时间的变化。还对老年人进行了额外的分析,以评估可用性和可接受性的差异是否与居住环境(即单独居住还是与他人居住)有关。此外,还对 T0 和 T6 阶段的可用性、可接受性和对技术的压力进行了相关分析:在 T0 和 T6 阶段,老年人的可用性得分均低于 IC 和 FC,焦虑感则高于 IC。随着时间的推移,老年人对技术的态度得分明显下降,表现出消极态度(T0 中位数为 4.2,IQR 为 0.5;T6 中位数为 3.7,IQR 为 0.8;Cohen d=0.7),而 IC 和 FC 则没有变化。在 T0 阶段,独居者的可接受性低于与他人同住者,但这一差异在 T6 阶段消失了。与他人同住的人或参与者在焦虑、对技术的态度、乐趣和感知有用性方面都有所下降。进入研究的老年人组中,对技术的压力影响了可用性和可接受性(ρ=-.85),但在 6 个月后没有观察到这种情况。在集成电路组中,压力会在 T0 阶段影响信任度(ρ=-.23),但在 T6 阶段则不会:在研究开始时,与护理人员相比,老年人认为系统的可用性较低,压力较大。事实上,一开始,技术压力与可用性和可接受性相关;但随着反复使用,技术压力并不影响对技术的感知。总的来说,习惯使用技术会减少对技术的焦虑和压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Age Variation Among US Adults' Social Media Experiences and Beliefs About Who Is Responsible for Reducing Health-Related Falsehoods: Secondary Analysis of a National Survey. Enhancing Frailty Assessments for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Real-World Evidence Study. Nurses' and Nursing Assistants' Experiences With Teleconsultation in Small Rural Long-Term Care Facilities: Semistructured Interview Pilot Study. Functional Monitoring of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Multidimensional Wearable Plantar Pressure Features: Cross-Sectional Study. Social Robots and Sensors for Enhanced Aging at Home: Mixed Methods Study With a Focus on Mobility and Socioeconomic Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1