{"title":"Validation of a multi-parameter algorithm for personalized contrast injection protocol in liver CT.","authors":"Hugues G Brat, Benoit Dufour, Natalie Heracleous, Pauline Sastre, Cyril Thouly, Benoit Rizk, Federica Zanca","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00492-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In liver computed tomography (CT), tailoring the contrast injection to the patient's specific characteristics is relevant for optimal imaging and patient safety. We evaluated a novel algorithm engineered for personalized contrast injection to achieve reproducible liver enhancement centered on 50 HU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2020 to August 31, 2022, CT data from consecutive adult patients were prospectively collected at our multicenter premises. Inclusion criteria consisted of an abdominal CT referral for cancer staging or follow-up. For all examinations, a web interface incorporating data from the radiology information system (patient details and examination information) and radiographer-inputted data (patient fat-free mass, imaging center, kVp, contrast agent details, and imaging phase) were used. Calculated contrast volume and injection rate were manually entered into the CT console controlling the injector. Iopamidol 370 mgI/mL or Iohexol 350 mgI/mL were used, and kVp varied (80, 100, or 120) based on patient habitus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 384 patients (mean age 61.2 years, range 21.1-94.5). The amount of administered iodine dose (gI) was not significantly different across contrast agents (p = 0.700), while a significant increase in iodine dose was observed with increasing kVp (p < 0.001) and in males versus females (p < 0.001), as expected. Despite the differences in administered iodine load, image quality was reproducible across patients with 72.1% of the examinations falling within the desirable range of 40-60 HU.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated a novel algorithm for personalized contrast injection in adult abdominal CT, achieving consistent liver enhancement centered at 50 HU.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>In healthcare's ongoing shift towards personalized medicine, the algorithm offers excellent potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient management, particularly for the detection and follow-up of liver malignancies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The algorithm achieves reproducible liver enhancement, promising improved diagnostic accuracy and patient management in diverse clinical settings. The real-world study demonstrates this algorithm's adaptability to different variables ensuring high-quality liver imaging. A personalized algorithm optimizes liver CT, improving the visibility, conspicuity, and follow-up of liver lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00492-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In liver computed tomography (CT), tailoring the contrast injection to the patient's specific characteristics is relevant for optimal imaging and patient safety. We evaluated a novel algorithm engineered for personalized contrast injection to achieve reproducible liver enhancement centered on 50 HU.
Methods: From September 2020 to August 31, 2022, CT data from consecutive adult patients were prospectively collected at our multicenter premises. Inclusion criteria consisted of an abdominal CT referral for cancer staging or follow-up. For all examinations, a web interface incorporating data from the radiology information system (patient details and examination information) and radiographer-inputted data (patient fat-free mass, imaging center, kVp, contrast agent details, and imaging phase) were used. Calculated contrast volume and injection rate were manually entered into the CT console controlling the injector. Iopamidol 370 mgI/mL or Iohexol 350 mgI/mL were used, and kVp varied (80, 100, or 120) based on patient habitus.
Results: We enrolled 384 patients (mean age 61.2 years, range 21.1-94.5). The amount of administered iodine dose (gI) was not significantly different across contrast agents (p = 0.700), while a significant increase in iodine dose was observed with increasing kVp (p < 0.001) and in males versus females (p < 0.001), as expected. Despite the differences in administered iodine load, image quality was reproducible across patients with 72.1% of the examinations falling within the desirable range of 40-60 HU.
Conclusion: This study validated a novel algorithm for personalized contrast injection in adult abdominal CT, achieving consistent liver enhancement centered at 50 HU.
Relevance statement: In healthcare's ongoing shift towards personalized medicine, the algorithm offers excellent potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient management, particularly for the detection and follow-up of liver malignancies.
Key points: The algorithm achieves reproducible liver enhancement, promising improved diagnostic accuracy and patient management in diverse clinical settings. The real-world study demonstrates this algorithm's adaptability to different variables ensuring high-quality liver imaging. A personalized algorithm optimizes liver CT, improving the visibility, conspicuity, and follow-up of liver lesions.