Magnitude of Septic Shock and its Associated Factors Among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241281865
Kasie Gebeyehu Tiruneh, Migbar Sibhat Mekonnen, Melsew Getnet Tsegaw, Taye Mezgebu Ashine, Edmialem Getahun Mesfin, Asaminew Habtamu Sane, Hailu Asmare Beyene, Melkie Ambaw Mengstie, Wuletaw Chane Zewude
{"title":"Magnitude of Septic Shock and its Associated Factors Among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 Care Centers, Ethiopia.","authors":"Kasie Gebeyehu Tiruneh, Migbar Sibhat Mekonnen, Melsew Getnet Tsegaw, Taye Mezgebu Ashine, Edmialem Getahun Mesfin, Asaminew Habtamu Sane, Hailu Asmare Beyene, Melkie Ambaw Mengstie, Wuletaw Chane Zewude","doi":"10.1177/23779608241281865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic imposed a major public health impact. Septic shock is one of the frequent complications encountered among critically ill COVID-19 patients, leading to poor healthcare outcomes. This study aimed at assessing the magnitude of septic shock and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted retrospectively on 242 randomly selected COVID-19 patients admitted to three Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers from September 2020 to October 2021. Septic shock was defined as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 points and persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure of ≥65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation. Variables in the bivariate analysis were fitted to multiple regression analysis to eliminate confounders and determine independent risk factors for septic shock. In the multivariable analysis, statistical significance was declared at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of septic shock was found to be 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.1, 45.7). Advanced age (≥60 years) [AOR = 7.9; 95% CI: 2.3, 26.8], intensive care unit stay above 7 days [AOR = 6.2; 95%CI: 2.1, 18.7], invasive ventilation [AOR = 10; 95% CI: 3, 37], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [AOR = 18; 95% CI: 7, 45] were significantly associated with increased septic shock among COVID-19 patients. Meanwhile, diabetes [AOR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.71] and cardiovascular diseases [AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.44] were associated with a decrease risk of septic shock.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of septic shock in critically ill COVID-19 patients was high and a major concern in this study, and it is independently associated with advanced age, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit, and COPD. Based on these findings, healthcare professionals should closely monitor and manage patients with COVID-19 who have a history of COPD, are older, or prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays to prevent septic shock and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241281865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241281865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic imposed a major public health impact. Septic shock is one of the frequent complications encountered among critically ill COVID-19 patients, leading to poor healthcare outcomes. This study aimed at assessing the magnitude of septic shock and its associated factors.

Methods and materials: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted retrospectively on 242 randomly selected COVID-19 patients admitted to three Addis Ababa COVID-19 care centers from September 2020 to October 2021. Septic shock was defined as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 points and persisting hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure of ≥65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation. Variables in the bivariate analysis were fitted to multiple regression analysis to eliminate confounders and determine independent risk factors for septic shock. In the multivariable analysis, statistical significance was declared at P < .05.

Results: The prevalence of septic shock was found to be 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.1, 45.7). Advanced age (≥60 years) [AOR = 7.9; 95% CI: 2.3, 26.8], intensive care unit stay above 7 days [AOR = 6.2; 95%CI: 2.1, 18.7], invasive ventilation [AOR = 10; 95% CI: 3, 37], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [AOR = 18; 95% CI: 7, 45] were significantly associated with increased septic shock among COVID-19 patients. Meanwhile, diabetes [AOR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.71] and cardiovascular diseases [AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.44] were associated with a decrease risk of septic shock.

Conclusion: The prevalence of septic shock in critically ill COVID-19 patients was high and a major concern in this study, and it is independently associated with advanced age, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit, and COPD. Based on these findings, healthcare professionals should closely monitor and manage patients with COVID-19 who have a history of COPD, are older, or prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays to prevent septic shock and improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴 COVID-19 护理中心 COVID-19 重症患者的脓毒性休克程度及其相关因素。
背景:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对公共卫生造成了重大影响。脓毒性休克是 COVID-19 重症患者经常遇到的并发症之一,导致不良的医疗结果。本研究旨在评估脓毒性休克的严重程度及其相关因素:2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 10 月期间,对亚的斯亚贝巴三家 COVID-19 护理中心随机选取的 242 名 COVID-19 患者进行了一项以机构为基础的横断面研究。脓毒性休克的定义是:序贯器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分≥2分,尽管进行了充分的容量复苏,但仍出现持续性低血压,需要使用血管加压药维持平均动脉压≥65 mmHg。将二元分析中的变量进行多元回归分析,以消除混杂因素并确定脓毒性休克的独立风险因素。在多变量分析中,统计显著性以 P 为标准:脓毒性休克的发病率为 39.3%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:33.1, 45.7)。高龄(≥60 岁)[AOR = 7.9;95% CI:2.3,26.8]、重症监护室住院超过 7 天[AOR = 6.2;95%CI:2.1,18.7]、有创通气[AOR = 10;95% CI:3,37]和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)[AOR = 18;95% CI:7,45]与 COVID-19 患者脓毒性休克的增加显著相关。同时,糖尿病[AOR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.71]和心血管疾病[AOR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.44]与脓毒性休克风险降低有关:结论:在本研究中,COVID-19 重症患者的脓毒性休克发生率很高,是一个值得关注的主要问题,它与高龄、重症监护室住院时间过长和慢性阻塞性肺病独立相关。基于这些发现,医护人员应密切监测和管理有慢性阻塞性肺病病史、年龄较大或重症监护室(ICU)住院时间较长的 COVID-19 患者,以预防脓毒性休克并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cultivation of Grit in Nursing Students: A Qualitative Descriptive Study "Cultivation of Grit". Perspectives of Midwives and Nurse Practitioners in Kentucky on Exercise Counseling During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study. Factors Influencing Modern Family Planning Utilization and Barriers in Women of Reproductive Age in the Iringa Region, Tanzania: A Mixed-Methods Study. Practice, Experiences, and Facilitators of Simulation-Based Training During One Year of Implementation in 30 Hospitals in Tanzania. Prospects of e-Coaching as a Platform for Empowering Families of Person With Mental Disorder: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1