Safety and immunogenicity of a delayed booster dose of the rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine for prevention of Ebola virus disease: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial

IF 20.9 1区 生物学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Microbe Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00163-0
Richard T Davey Jr. MD , Gary L Collins MS , Nadine Rouphael MD , Guillaume Poliquin MD , Rosemary McConnell RN , Gabrielle Grubbs BS , Susan L Moir PhD , Joanne M Langley MD , Marc Teitelbaum MD , Angela L Hewlett MD , Prof Susan L F McLellan MD , Nahid Bhadelia MD , Vanessa N Raabe MD , Prof Mark J Mulligan MD , Irina Maljkovic Berry PhD , Bonnie Dighero-Kemp BSc , Jonathan R Kurtz PhD , Lisa E Hensley PhD , Nelson C E Dozier MS , Lindsay C B Marron MS , Prof James D Neaton PhD
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of a delayed booster dose of the rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine for prevention of Ebola virus disease: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial","authors":"Richard T Davey Jr. MD ,&nbsp;Gary L Collins MS ,&nbsp;Nadine Rouphael MD ,&nbsp;Guillaume Poliquin MD ,&nbsp;Rosemary McConnell RN ,&nbsp;Gabrielle Grubbs BS ,&nbsp;Susan L Moir PhD ,&nbsp;Joanne M Langley MD ,&nbsp;Marc Teitelbaum MD ,&nbsp;Angela L Hewlett MD ,&nbsp;Prof Susan L F McLellan MD ,&nbsp;Nahid Bhadelia MD ,&nbsp;Vanessa N Raabe MD ,&nbsp;Prof Mark J Mulligan MD ,&nbsp;Irina Maljkovic Berry PhD ,&nbsp;Bonnie Dighero-Kemp BSc ,&nbsp;Jonathan R Kurtz PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa E Hensley PhD ,&nbsp;Nelson C E Dozier MS ,&nbsp;Lindsay C B Marron MS ,&nbsp;Prof James D Neaton PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00163-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP is the first approved vaccine with clinical efficacy against Ebola virus disease. Although a seroprotective threshold has not been defined for those at occupational risk of exposure, the current vaccine strategy is to attain a sustained high level of antibody titres. The aim of this trial was to explore the effects of delayed boosting upon both the height and duration of antibody titres following primary immunisation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this open-label phase 2 randomised controlled trial, we compared antibody titres at month 36 in participants who had received a homologous booster dose at month 18 following primary immunisation with those who had received no booster. From Oct 25, 2016, to Jan 29, 2020, healthy adults aged 18 years or older deemed at occupational risk of exposure to Ebola virus due to laboratory work, clinical duties, or travel to an active endemic region were recruited from four hospital clinics in the USA and one hospital clinic in Canada and received primary vaccination with 2×10<sup>7</sup> plaque-forming unit per mL of VSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. 18 months later, individuals who consented and were still eligible were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a homologous booster dose or no booster. Study visits for safety and serial blood collections for antibody titres were done on enrolled participants at months 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 19, 24, 30, and 36. Through July, 2021, a web-based application was used for randomisation, including assignments with schedules for each of the five sites using mixed permuted blocks. The trial was not masked to participants or site staff. The primary endpoint was a comparison of geometric mean titres (GMTs) of anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein IgG antibody at month 36 (ie, 18 months after randomisation) for all randomly assigned participants who completed the 36 months of follow-up (primary analysis cohort). Investigators were aware of antibody titres from baseline (enrolment) through month 18 but were masked to summary data by randomisation group after month 18. This study is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT02788227</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of the 248 participants who enrolled and received their primary immunisation, 114 proceeded to the randomisation step at month 18. The two randomisation groups were balanced: 57 participants (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42 years [IQR 35–50]) were randomly assigned to the booster group and 57 (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42 years [IQR 36–51]) to the no-booster group. Of those randomly assigned, 92 participants (45 in the booster group and 47 in the no-booster group) completed 36 months of follow-up. At 18 months after primary immunisation, GMTs in the no-booster group increased from a baseline of 10 ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 7–14) to 1451 EU/mL (1118–1882); GMTs in the booster group increased from 9 EU/mL (6–16) to 1769 EU/mL (1348–2321). At month 19, GMTs were 31 408 EU/mL (23 181–42 554) for the booster group and 1406 EU/mL (1078–1833) for the no-booster group; at month 36, GMTs were 10 146 EU/mL (7960–12 933) for the booster group and 1240 EU/mL (984–1563) for the no-booster group. Accordingly, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of antibody titres had increased almost 21-fold more in the booster versus no-booster group at 1 month after booster administration (GMR 20·6; 95% CI 18·2–23·0; p&lt;0·0001) and was still over 7-fold higher at month 36 (GMR 7·8; 95% CI 5·5–10·2; p&lt;0·0001). Consistent with previous reports of this vaccine’s side-effects, transient mono-articular or oligo-articular arthritis was diagnosed in 18 (9%) of 207 primary vaccination recipients; after randomisation, arthritis was diagnosed in one (2%) of 57 participants in the no-booster group. No new cases of arthritis developed after booster administration. Four serious adverse events occurred following randomisation: one (epistaxis) in the booster group and three (gastrointestinal haemorrhage, prostate cancer, and tachyarrhythmia) in the no-booster group. None of the serious adverse events was judged attributable to the booster vaccination assignment.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In addition to no new safety concerns and in marked contrast to earlier trials evaluating short-term boosting, delaying a rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP booster until month 18 resulted in an increase in GMT that remained several-fold above the no-booster group GMT for at least 18 months. These findings could have implications for defining the optimal timing of booster doses as pre-exposure prophylaxis in populations at ongoing risk for Ebola virus exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>The Division of Intramural Research and the Division of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the US National Institutes of Health, Canadian Immunization Research Network through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":"5 11","pages":"Article 100923"},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524724001630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP is the first approved vaccine with clinical efficacy against Ebola virus disease. Although a seroprotective threshold has not been defined for those at occupational risk of exposure, the current vaccine strategy is to attain a sustained high level of antibody titres. The aim of this trial was to explore the effects of delayed boosting upon both the height and duration of antibody titres following primary immunisation.

Methods

In this open-label phase 2 randomised controlled trial, we compared antibody titres at month 36 in participants who had received a homologous booster dose at month 18 following primary immunisation with those who had received no booster. From Oct 25, 2016, to Jan 29, 2020, healthy adults aged 18 years or older deemed at occupational risk of exposure to Ebola virus due to laboratory work, clinical duties, or travel to an active endemic region were recruited from four hospital clinics in the USA and one hospital clinic in Canada and received primary vaccination with 2×107 plaque-forming unit per mL of VSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. 18 months later, individuals who consented and were still eligible were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a homologous booster dose or no booster. Study visits for safety and serial blood collections for antibody titres were done on enrolled participants at months 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 19, 24, 30, and 36. Through July, 2021, a web-based application was used for randomisation, including assignments with schedules for each of the five sites using mixed permuted blocks. The trial was not masked to participants or site staff. The primary endpoint was a comparison of geometric mean titres (GMTs) of anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein IgG antibody at month 36 (ie, 18 months after randomisation) for all randomly assigned participants who completed the 36 months of follow-up (primary analysis cohort). Investigators were aware of antibody titres from baseline (enrolment) through month 18 but were masked to summary data by randomisation group after month 18. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02788227).

Findings

Of the 248 participants who enrolled and received their primary immunisation, 114 proceeded to the randomisation step at month 18. The two randomisation groups were balanced: 57 participants (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42 years [IQR 35–50]) were randomly assigned to the booster group and 57 (24 [42%] of whom were female; median age was 42 years [IQR 36–51]) to the no-booster group. Of those randomly assigned, 92 participants (45 in the booster group and 47 in the no-booster group) completed 36 months of follow-up. At 18 months after primary immunisation, GMTs in the no-booster group increased from a baseline of 10 ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 7–14) to 1451 EU/mL (1118–1882); GMTs in the booster group increased from 9 EU/mL (6–16) to 1769 EU/mL (1348–2321). At month 19, GMTs were 31 408 EU/mL (23 181–42 554) for the booster group and 1406 EU/mL (1078–1833) for the no-booster group; at month 36, GMTs were 10 146 EU/mL (7960–12 933) for the booster group and 1240 EU/mL (984–1563) for the no-booster group. Accordingly, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of antibody titres had increased almost 21-fold more in the booster versus no-booster group at 1 month after booster administration (GMR 20·6; 95% CI 18·2–23·0; p<0·0001) and was still over 7-fold higher at month 36 (GMR 7·8; 95% CI 5·5–10·2; p<0·0001). Consistent with previous reports of this vaccine’s side-effects, transient mono-articular or oligo-articular arthritis was diagnosed in 18 (9%) of 207 primary vaccination recipients; after randomisation, arthritis was diagnosed in one (2%) of 57 participants in the no-booster group. No new cases of arthritis developed after booster administration. Four serious adverse events occurred following randomisation: one (epistaxis) in the booster group and three (gastrointestinal haemorrhage, prostate cancer, and tachyarrhythmia) in the no-booster group. None of the serious adverse events was judged attributable to the booster vaccination assignment.

Interpretation

In addition to no new safety concerns and in marked contrast to earlier trials evaluating short-term boosting, delaying a rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP booster until month 18 resulted in an increase in GMT that remained several-fold above the no-booster group GMT for at least 18 months. These findings could have implications for defining the optimal timing of booster doses as pre-exposure prophylaxis in populations at ongoing risk for Ebola virus exposure.

Funding

The Division of Intramural Research and the Division of Clinical Research of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the US National Institutes of Health, Canadian Immunization Research Network through the Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防埃博拉病毒疾病的 rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP 疫苗延迟加强剂量的安全性和免疫原性:一项多中心、开放标签、2 期随机对照试验。
背景:rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP 是首个获批的具有临床疗效的埃博拉病毒病疫苗。虽然尚未确定职业暴露风险人群的血清保护阈值,但目前的疫苗策略是获得持续的高抗体滴度。本试验的目的是探索延迟强化对初次免疫后抗体滴度的高度和持续时间的影响:在这项开放标签的 2 期随机对照试验中,我们比较了在初次免疫后第 18 个月接受过同源强化剂的参与者与未接受强化剂的参与者在第 36 个月时的抗体滴度。从 2016 年 10 月 25 日至 2020 年 1 月 29 日,我们从美国的四家医院诊所和加拿大的一家医院诊所招募了因实验室工作、临床职责或前往活跃的流行地区而被认为有接触埃博拉病毒职业风险的 18 岁或以上健康成年人,他们接受了每毫升 2×107 个斑块形成单位的 VSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP 初次接种。18 个月后,同意接种且仍符合接种条件的患者按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到接受同种强化免疫或不接受强化免疫。在第 0、1、3、6、12、18、19、24、30 和 36 个月,对入选者进行安全性考察和连续采血检测抗体滴度。到 2021 年 7 月,使用基于网络的应用程序进行随机分配,包括使用混合排列区块为五个地点的每个地点分配时间表。试验不对参与者或试验点工作人员进行蒙蔽。主要终点是比较所有完成36个月随访的随机分配参与者(主要分析队列)在第36个月(即随机分配后18个月)时抗埃博拉病毒糖蛋白IgG抗体的几何平均滴度(GMT)。研究人员了解从基线(入组)到第 18 个月的抗体滴度,但在第 18 个月后,研究人员将被屏蔽,无法获得随机分组的汇总数据。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02788227) 上注册:结果:在 248 名注册并接受初次免疫接种的参与者中,有 114 人在第 18 个月时进入随机分组步骤。两个随机分组是平衡的:57名参与者(其中24人[42%]为女性;年龄中位数为42岁[IQR为35-50岁])被随机分配到加强组,57名参与者(其中24人[42%]为女性;年龄中位数为42岁[IQR为36-51岁])被随机分配到不加强组。在随机分配的参与者中,有 92 人(强化免疫组 45 人,无强化免疫组 47 人)完成了 36 个月的随访。初次免疫接种后18个月,无强化免疫组的GMT值从基线的10个ELISA单位(EU)/毫升(95% CI 7-14)升至1451个EU/毫升(1118-1882);强化免疫组的GMT值从9个EU/毫升(6-16)升至1769个EU/毫升(1348-2321)。第 19 个月时,增强组的 GMT 为 31 408 EU/mL(23 181-42 554),无增强组为 1406 EU/mL(1078-1833);第 36 个月时,增强组的 GMT 为 10 146 EU/mL(7960-12 933),无增强组为 1240 EU/mL(984-1563)。因此,在注射加强剂 1 个月后,加强剂组与未注射加强剂组的抗体滴度几何平均比(GMR)增加了近 21 倍(GMR 20-6;95% CI 18-2-23-0;p解释:加强剂组与未注射加强剂组的抗体滴度几何平均比(GMR)增加了近 21 倍(GMR 20-6;95% CI 18-2-23-0):rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP强化剂推迟到第18个月使用,除了没有新的安全性问题外,与早期评估短期强化剂的试验形成鲜明对比的是,在至少18个月内,GMT仍比无强化剂组GMT高出数倍。这些发现可能会对确定加强剂量的最佳时机产生影响,以作为埃博拉病毒持续暴露风险人群的暴露前预防措施:美国国立卫生研究院国立过敏与传染病研究所校内研究部和临床研究部、加拿大公共卫生署加拿大免疫研究网络、加拿大卫生研究院和美国国防威胁削减局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Microbe
Lancet Microbe Multiple-
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
0.80%
发文量
278
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.
期刊最新文献
Genomic reconstruction of an azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis outbreak and the creation of a multi-locus sequence typing scheme: a retrospective observational and genomic epidemiology study. Reassessing the role of butyrate-producing bacteria in infection risk. Using demographics of patients to inform treatment of shigellosis in England. Variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipid body content in sputum and its implications for treatment response. Therapeutics for Nipah virus disease: a systematic review to support prioritisation of drug candidates for clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1