Technology supported High Intensity Training in chronic non-specific low back pain (the Techno-HIT trial): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002180
Julie Sylvie van Eetvelde, Annick A A Timmermans, Karin Coninx, Kristof Kempeneers, Mira Meeus, Wim Marneffe, Timo Meus, Iris Meuwissen, Nathalie Anne Roussel, Gaetane Stassijns, Jonas Verbrugghe
{"title":"Technology supported High Intensity Training in chronic non-specific low back pain (the Techno-HIT trial): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Julie Sylvie van Eetvelde, Annick A A Timmermans, Karin Coninx, Kristof Kempeneers, Mira Meeus, Wim Marneffe, Timo Meus, Iris Meuwissen, Nathalie Anne Roussel, Gaetane Stassijns, Jonas Verbrugghe","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal disorders worldwide. Guidelines recommend exercise therapy (ET) in CLBP management, but more research is needed to investigate specific ET modalities and their underlying mechanisms. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of a time-contingent individualised high-intensity training (HIT) protocol on disability compared with a time-contingent moderate-intensity training (MIT) as used in usual care, in persons with severely disabling CLBP. Additionally, the effectiveness on central effects, the added value of prolonged training at home and technology support, and the cost-effectiveness are evaluated. In this randomised controlled trial, CLBP patients will be randomly divided into three groups of 56 participants. Group 1, 'TechnoHIT', receives HIT with technology-support in the home-phase. Group 2, 'HIT', receives HIT without technology support. Group 3, 'MIT', receives MIT, reflecting training intensity as used in usual care. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability, measured by the Modified Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include quantitative sensory testing, psychosocial factors, broad physical fitness, quality of life, cost-effectiveness, adherence and usability of technology. Trial registration number NCT06491121.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common chronic musculoskeletal disorders worldwide. Guidelines recommend exercise therapy (ET) in CLBP management, but more research is needed to investigate specific ET modalities and their underlying mechanisms. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of a time-contingent individualised high-intensity training (HIT) protocol on disability compared with a time-contingent moderate-intensity training (MIT) as used in usual care, in persons with severely disabling CLBP. Additionally, the effectiveness on central effects, the added value of prolonged training at home and technology support, and the cost-effectiveness are evaluated. In this randomised controlled trial, CLBP patients will be randomly divided into three groups of 56 participants. Group 1, 'TechnoHIT', receives HIT with technology-support in the home-phase. Group 2, 'HIT', receives HIT without technology support. Group 3, 'MIT', receives MIT, reflecting training intensity as used in usual care. The primary outcome is patient-reported disability, measured by the Modified Oswestry Disability Index. Secondary outcomes include quantitative sensory testing, psychosocial factors, broad physical fitness, quality of life, cost-effectiveness, adherence and usability of technology. Trial registration number NCT06491121.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对慢性非特异性腰背痛的技术支持高强度训练(Techno-HIT 试验):随机对照试验研究方案。
慢性腰背痛(CLBP)是全球最常见的慢性肌肉骨骼疾病之一。指南建议在治疗慢性腰背痛时采用运动疗法(ET),但还需要更多的研究来探讨特定的运动疗法模式及其内在机制。本研究的主要目的是评估在严重致残性慢性肢体麻痹症患者中,与常规护理中使用的以时间为条件的中等强度训练(MIT)相比,以时间为条件的个性化高强度训练(HIT)方案对残疾的短期和长期疗效。此外,该试验还评估了中心效应的有效性、在家长期训练和技术支持的附加值以及成本效益。在这项随机对照试验中,CLBP 患者将被随机分为三组,每组 56 人。第一组,"TechnoHIT",在家庭阶段接受带有技术支持的 HIT。第 2 组,"HIT",接受无技术支持的 HIT。第 3 组,"MIT",接受 MIT,训练强度与常规护理相同。主要结果是患者报告的残疾情况,以改良奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Modified Oswestry Disability Index)衡量。次要结果包括定量感官测试、社会心理因素、广泛的身体素质、生活质量、成本效益、依从性和技术的可用性。试验注册号为 NCT06491121。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1