Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.5014/ajot.2024.050820
Darya Nemati, Delaney McKee, Emily F Rothman
{"title":"Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.","authors":"Darya Nemati, Delaney McKee, Emily F Rothman","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, changing access to abortion in many states. The impact of these changes on occupational therapy practice has not yet been explored through empirical research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the perspectives of occupational therapy practitioners on how restrictions to abortion in the United States may have influenced their clients' needs and thus their practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a qualitative research study. We used an interpretivist epistemological approach and an inductive, thematic content analysis. Participants were recruited through state occupational therapy associations and social media. Two independent researchers coded data and had an initial agreement percentage of 88%. Data trustworthiness was enhanced through documentation of decisions, reflexive thinking about our positionality and the data, and team-based discussions.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Occupational therapy practitioners (N = 15) working in states with new abortion law changes at the time of interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four key themes of this study were as follows: (1) abortion restriction laws are affecting some occupational therapy clients' mental health, (2) clients are discussing reproductive health with occupational therapy practitioners across a variety of settings, (3) occupational therapy practitioners are using clinical judgment and their personal beliefs to support clients affected by abortion restrictions, and (4) occupational therapy practitioners are seeking guidance and evidence-based resources to best support clients in the wake of abortion-related legislation changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Our findings underscore the relevance of reproductive health to occupational therapy practice and highlight the importance of preparing occupational therapy practitioners to respond to client needs related to abortion care. Plain-Language Summary: We sought to determine whether occupational therapy practitioners perceive that the 2022 abortion-related restrictions are affecting occupational therapy practice; specifically, we wanted to know whether and how practice is being affected and what resources occupational therapy practitioners might need to address clients' needs. Fifteen occupational therapy practitioners were interviewed and revealed that many of their clients were experiencing stress and anxiety (i.e., mental health challenges) specifically related to abortion access. We also found that occupational therapy practitioners who routinely discuss reproductive health with clients were commonly hearing from clients about abortion-related needs. Overall, this research uncovers a need for resources and guidance from state or national occupational therapy organizations so that occupational therapy practitioners can better support their clients given these new changes in abortion access. Positionality Statement: We are a team of three researchers who identify as cisgender women, and we reside in an urban area in the northeastern United States. Two of us identify as White, and one identifies as a person of color. We have all participated in reproductive health access advocacy and critically examined our own lenses as we engaged in this analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, changing access to abortion in many states. The impact of these changes on occupational therapy practice has not yet been explored through empirical research.

Objective: To explore the perspectives of occupational therapy practitioners on how restrictions to abortion in the United States may have influenced their clients' needs and thus their practice.

Design: This was a qualitative research study. We used an interpretivist epistemological approach and an inductive, thematic content analysis. Participants were recruited through state occupational therapy associations and social media. Two independent researchers coded data and had an initial agreement percentage of 88%. Data trustworthiness was enhanced through documentation of decisions, reflexive thinking about our positionality and the data, and team-based discussions.

Participants: Occupational therapy practitioners (N = 15) working in states with new abortion law changes at the time of interviews.

Results: The four key themes of this study were as follows: (1) abortion restriction laws are affecting some occupational therapy clients' mental health, (2) clients are discussing reproductive health with occupational therapy practitioners across a variety of settings, (3) occupational therapy practitioners are using clinical judgment and their personal beliefs to support clients affected by abortion restrictions, and (4) occupational therapy practitioners are seeking guidance and evidence-based resources to best support clients in the wake of abortion-related legislation changes.

Conclusions and relevance: Our findings underscore the relevance of reproductive health to occupational therapy practice and highlight the importance of preparing occupational therapy practitioners to respond to client needs related to abortion care. Plain-Language Summary: We sought to determine whether occupational therapy practitioners perceive that the 2022 abortion-related restrictions are affecting occupational therapy practice; specifically, we wanted to know whether and how practice is being affected and what resources occupational therapy practitioners might need to address clients' needs. Fifteen occupational therapy practitioners were interviewed and revealed that many of their clients were experiencing stress and anxiety (i.e., mental health challenges) specifically related to abortion access. We also found that occupational therapy practitioners who routinely discuss reproductive health with clients were commonly hearing from clients about abortion-related needs. Overall, this research uncovers a need for resources and guidance from state or national occupational therapy organizations so that occupational therapy practitioners can better support their clients given these new changes in abortion access. Positionality Statement: We are a team of three researchers who identify as cisgender women, and we reside in an urban area in the northeastern United States. Two of us identify as White, and one identifies as a person of color. We have all participated in reproductive health access advocacy and critically examined our own lenses as we engaged in this analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国堕胎法的变化与职业治疗实践。
重要性:美国最高法院于 2022 年推翻了罗伊诉韦德案,改变了许多州的堕胎途径。这些变化对职业治疗实践的影响尚未通过实证研究进行探讨:探索职业治疗从业者的观点,了解美国对堕胎的限制如何影响其客户的需求,进而影响他们的实践:这是一项定性研究。我们采用了解释主义认识论方法和归纳式主题内容分析。我们通过州职业治疗协会和社交媒体招募参与者。两名独立研究人员对数据进行了编码,初步达成一致的比例为 88%。通过记录决策、反思我们的立场和数据以及团队讨论,提高了数据的可信度:职业治疗从业人员(N = 15),在接受访谈时在堕胎法有新变化的州工作:本研究的四个关键主题如下:(结果:本研究的四个关键主题如下:(1)限制堕胎的法律正在影响一些职业治疗客户的心理健康;(2)客户正在与职业治疗从业者讨论各种环境下的生殖健康问题;(3)职业治疗从业者正在利用临床判断和个人信念为受堕胎限制影响的客户提供支持;以及(4)职业治疗从业者正在寻求指导和循证资源,以便在堕胎相关法律变更后为客户提供最佳支持:我们的研究结果强调了生殖健康与职业治疗实践的相关性,并突出了职业治疗从业人员做好准备以满足客户与堕胎护理相关需求的重要性。通俗摘要:我们试图确定职业治疗从业人员是否认为 2022 年与堕胎相关的限制措施正在影响职业治疗实践;具体而言,我们想知道实践是否受到影响以及如何受到影响,以及职业治疗从业人员可能需要哪些资源来满足客户的需求。我们对 15 名职业治疗从业者进行了访谈,结果显示,他们的许多客户都经历了与堕胎相关的压力和焦虑(即心理健康挑战)。我们还发现,经常与客户讨论生殖健康问题的职业治疗从业者通常会听到客户提出与堕胎相关的需求。总之,这项研究发现,州或国家职业治疗组织需要提供资源和指导,以便职业治疗从业人员能够在堕胎准入发生新变化的情况下更好地为客户提供支持。立场声明:我们是一个由三名研究人员组成的团队,她们都是顺性别女性,居住在美国东北部的一个城市地区。我们中的两人都是白人,一人是有色人种。我们都参与过生殖健康宣传活动,并在参与本分析时批判性地审视了自己的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
期刊最新文献
Educating the Educator: Applying a Growth Mindset Approach to Prepare Educators for Major Changes in Occupational Therapy Education. Predictive Factors of State Licensure Board Disciplinary Actions in Occupational Therapy. The Hand Accumulation aNd Dexterity FUnctional Limits-Shriners (HANDFULS): A New Clinically Feasible Measure of Hand Volume and In-Hand Manipulation for Children. Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function. Abortion Law Changes and Occupational Therapy Practice in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1