Personal protection equipment: pockets, perceptions and equity - the untold truth of PPE: a reflexive thematic analysis.

D J Janson, V Dhokia, K Banks, J H D Rodohan, B C Clift
{"title":"Personal protection equipment: pockets, perceptions and equity - the untold truth of PPE: a reflexive thematic analysis.","authors":"D J Janson, V Dhokia, K Banks, J H D Rodohan, B C Clift","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2404748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn in a range of industrial environments by women and men alike. However, the majority of PPE is designed around male anthropometrics and the impacts of this on women are largely undocumented. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes from in-depth interviews with 30 women working in diverse roles in industrial environments, around their experiences of wearing PPE. Four themes developed: 'There's nothing here for me'; 'Collateral damage'; 'Organisational culture and the burden of responsibility'; and 'Personally protective women'. The findings significantly expand upon previous literature concerning: the reduced range of PPE available for women when compared with men; considerable fit and comfort issues; and physical, day-to-day and health-related consequences. This work evidences the increased PPE-related burden on women, and demonstrates fundamental links between women wearing ill-fitting or inappropriate PPE and their reduced sense of belonging, confidence and morale.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2404748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn in a range of industrial environments by women and men alike. However, the majority of PPE is designed around male anthropometrics and the impacts of this on women are largely undocumented. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes from in-depth interviews with 30 women working in diverse roles in industrial environments, around their experiences of wearing PPE. Four themes developed: 'There's nothing here for me'; 'Collateral damage'; 'Organisational culture and the burden of responsibility'; and 'Personally protective women'. The findings significantly expand upon previous literature concerning: the reduced range of PPE available for women when compared with men; considerable fit and comfort issues; and physical, day-to-day and health-related consequences. This work evidences the increased PPE-related burden on women, and demonstrates fundamental links between women wearing ill-fitting or inappropriate PPE and their reduced sense of belonging, confidence and morale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人防护设备:口袋、观念和公平--个人防护设备不为人知的真相:反思性专题分析。
在各种工业环境中,女性和男性都会穿戴个人防护设备(PPE)。然而,大多数个人防护设备都是根据男性的人体测量学设计的,这对女性的影响大多没有记录。对 30 名在工业环境中担任不同职务的女性进行了深入访谈,围绕她们穿戴个人防护设备的经历,采用了反思性主题分析法来确定主题。形成了四个主题:"这里没有我的东西";"附带损害";"组织文化和责任负担";以及 "具有个人保护意识的女性"。研究结果极大地扩展了以往的文献,涉及:与男性相比,女性可获得的个人防护设备种类较少;相当大的适用性和舒适性问题;以及与身体、日常和健康相关的后果。这项工作证明了妇女在个人防护设备方面的负担加重,并证明了妇女穿戴不合身或不合适的个人防护设备与她们的归属感、信心和士气下降之间的根本联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1