Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1177/15910199241288880
Steven G Roth, Seoiyoung Ahn, Campbell Liles, Lohit Velagapudi, Nishit Mummareddy, Yeji Ko, Austin M Hilvert, Michael T Froehler, Matthew R Fusco, Rohan V Chitale
{"title":"Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"Steven G Roth, Seoiyoung Ahn, Campbell Liles, Lohit Velagapudi, Nishit Mummareddy, Yeji Ko, Austin M Hilvert, Michael T Froehler, Matthew R Fusco, Rohan V Chitale","doi":"10.1177/15910199241288880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No consensus exists on the necessity of neurocritical care unit (NCU)-level care following unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) treatment. We aim to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment and determine potential cost savings utilizing a selective NCU admission protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all UIA patients who underwent endovascular treatment at a single center from 2017-2022 was conducted. Data on demographics, preprocedural variables, radiographic features, procedural techniques, intra/postoperative events, and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment. Cost analysis using hospital cost data (not charges/reimbursement) was performed using simulated step-down and floor protocols for patients without NCU indications following a hypothetical six-hour post-anesthesia care unit observation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 209 patients, 179 were discharged within 24 h and 30 had prolonged LOS. In our analysis, intra- and postoperative events independently predicted prolonged LOS. In our subanalysis, 47 patients demonstrated NCU needs: 24 with intraoperative indications, 18 with postoperative indications, and five with both. Of the 23 with postoperative indications, 20 were identified within six hours, while three were identified within six to 24 h. The median variable cost per patient for the current NCU protocol was $31,505 (IQR, $26,331-$37,053) vs. stepdown protocol $29,514 (IQR, $24,746-$35,011;p = 0.061) vs. floor protocol $26,768 (IQR, $22,214-$34,107;p < 0.001). Total variable costs were $6,211,497 for the current NCU protocol vs. $5,921,912 for the step-down protocol (4.89% savings) and $5,509,052 for the floor protocol (12.75% savings).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients requiring NCU-level care following UIA treatment were identified within a six-hour postoperative window. Thus, selective NCU admission for this cohort following a six-hour observation period may be a logical avenue for cost reduction. Our analysis demonstrated 5% and 13% savings for uncomplicated patients using step-down and floor admission protocols, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241288880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241288880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: No consensus exists on the necessity of neurocritical care unit (NCU)-level care following unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) treatment. We aim to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment and determine potential cost savings utilizing a selective NCU admission protocol.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all UIA patients who underwent endovascular treatment at a single center from 2017-2022 was conducted. Data on demographics, preprocedural variables, radiographic features, procedural techniques, intra/postoperative events, and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify patients requiring NCU-level care post-treatment. Cost analysis using hospital cost data (not charges/reimbursement) was performed using simulated step-down and floor protocols for patients without NCU indications following a hypothetical six-hour post-anesthesia care unit observation period.

Results: Of 209 patients, 179 were discharged within 24 h and 30 had prolonged LOS. In our analysis, intra- and postoperative events independently predicted prolonged LOS. In our subanalysis, 47 patients demonstrated NCU needs: 24 with intraoperative indications, 18 with postoperative indications, and five with both. Of the 23 with postoperative indications, 20 were identified within six hours, while three were identified within six to 24 h. The median variable cost per patient for the current NCU protocol was $31,505 (IQR, $26,331-$37,053) vs. stepdown protocol $29,514 (IQR, $24,746-$35,011;p = 0.061) vs. floor protocol $26,768 (IQR, $22,214-$34,107;p < 0.001). Total variable costs were $6,211,497 for the current NCU protocol vs. $5,921,912 for the step-down protocol (4.89% savings) and $5,509,052 for the floor protocol (12.75% savings).

Conclusion: Most patients requiring NCU-level care following UIA treatment were identified within a six-hour postoperative window. Thus, selective NCU admission for this cohort following a six-hour observation period may be a logical avenue for cost reduction. Our analysis demonstrated 5% and 13% savings for uncomplicated patients using step-down and floor admission protocols, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未破裂颅内动脉瘤选择性血管内治疗后神经重症监护入院费用分析。
导言:对于未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)治疗后是否需要神经重症监护病房(NCU)级别的护理,目前尚无共识。我们旨在确定治疗后需要 NCU 级护理的患者,并利用选择性 NCU 入院方案确定潜在的成本节约:我们对 2017-2022 年间在一个中心接受血管内治疗的所有 UIA 患者进行了回顾性分析。收集了有关人口统计学、术前变量、影像学特征、手术技术、术中/术后事件和住院时间(LOS)的数据。进行了多变量分析,以确定治疗后需要接受 NCU 级护理的患者。使用医院成本数据(非收费/报销)进行成本分析,在假设的六小时麻醉后护理病房观察期后,对无NCU指征的患者采用模拟降级和楼层方案:在 209 名患者中,179 人在 24 小时内出院,30 人的住院时间较长。在我们的分析中,术中和术后事件可独立预测延长的 LOS。在我们的子分析中,47 名患者需要接受 NCU 治疗:24 人有术中适应症,18 人有术后适应症,5 人同时有术中和术后适应症。在 23 位有术后适应症的患者中,20 位在 6 小时内被确定,3 位在 6 到 24 小时内被确定。现行NCU方案与降级方案相比,每名患者的可变成本中位数分别为31,505美元(IQR,26,331-37,053美元)和29,514美元(IQR,24,746-35,011美元;P = 0.061),与底层方案相比,每名患者的可变成本中位数分别为26,768美元(IQR,22,214-34,107美元;P 结论:大多数接受 UIA 治疗后需要接受 NCU 级护理的患者都是在术后六小时内发现的。因此,在六小时观察期后有选择性地将这部分患者送入 NCU 可能是降低成本的合理途径。我们的分析表明,采用降级入院和楼层入院方案,无并发症患者可分别节省 5% 和 13%的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Circulating miRNA profiles as predictive biomarkers for aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment: a prospective study. "Chopperlysis": The effect of helicopter transport on reperfusion and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB-does the device matter? Analysis of selective neurocritical care admission costs following elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recognition of dural to pial supply in high-grade dural arteriovenous fistula: A technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1