Strategic implementation of a new robotic mitral repair program: Early experience and outcomes

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.052
Max Shin MD , Jonathan J. Szeto BA , Chase Brown MD , Omar Toubat MD, PhD , Mark R. Helmers MD , Amit Iyengar MD, MSE , Michael A. Acker MD , Arnar Geirsson MD , Robert L. Smith MD , Michael E. Ibrahim MD, PhD
{"title":"Strategic implementation of a new robotic mitral repair program: Early experience and outcomes","authors":"Max Shin MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan J. Szeto BA ,&nbsp;Chase Brown MD ,&nbsp;Omar Toubat MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mark R. Helmers MD ,&nbsp;Amit Iyengar MD, MSE ,&nbsp;Michael A. Acker MD ,&nbsp;Arnar Geirsson MD ,&nbsp;Robert L. Smith MD ,&nbsp;Michael E. Ibrahim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite numerous reported benefits of robotic mitral repair, the absolute number of procedures performed remain low in part to uncertainties about the necessary steps to launch a program. In this report, we describe our early outcomes and strategy with launching a successful new robotic mitral repair program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our multimodal strategic plan emphasized team education, hands-on technical preparation, stepwise advancement, and careful patient selection. Consultant service analytics and team debriefings allowed for iterative improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between March 2022 and February 2024, 50 patients underwent robotic mitral repair at our institution. Average age at time of operation was 62 years with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score of 0.58. Successful repairs were performed in 98% of patients. There was 1 conversion to sternotomy. There were no deaths, and there was minimal perioperative morbidity. On both predischarge and follow-up echocardiography, no patients had greater than mild mitral regurgitation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our work provides a model for establishing a successful robotic mitral program. An up-front emphasis on team education, careful preparation, proper patient selection, and feedback-driven improvements can accelerate the attainment of standards set by high-volume centers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"170 2","pages":"Pages 495-501"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522324009061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite numerous reported benefits of robotic mitral repair, the absolute number of procedures performed remain low in part to uncertainties about the necessary steps to launch a program. In this report, we describe our early outcomes and strategy with launching a successful new robotic mitral repair program.

Methods

Our multimodal strategic plan emphasized team education, hands-on technical preparation, stepwise advancement, and careful patient selection. Consultant service analytics and team debriefings allowed for iterative improvements.

Results

Between March 2022 and February 2024, 50 patients underwent robotic mitral repair at our institution. Average age at time of operation was 62 years with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score of 0.58. Successful repairs were performed in 98% of patients. There was 1 conversion to sternotomy. There were no deaths, and there was minimal perioperative morbidity. On both predischarge and follow-up echocardiography, no patients had greater than mild mitral regurgitation.

Conclusions

Our work provides a model for establishing a successful robotic mitral program. An up-front emphasis on team education, careful preparation, proper patient selection, and feedback-driven improvements can accelerate the attainment of standards set by high-volume centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新机器人二尖瓣修复计划的战略实施:早期经验与成果。
背景:尽管有大量关于机器人二尖瓣修复术优点的报道,但手术的绝对数量仍然很少,部分原因是启动项目的必要步骤不确定。在本报告中,我们介绍了成功启动新机器人二尖瓣修复项目的早期成果和策略:我们的多模式战略计划强调团队教育、实践技术准备、逐步推进和谨慎选择患者。顾问服务分析和团队汇报有助于反复改进:从 2022 年 3 月到 2024 年 2 月,共有 50 名患者在我院接受了机器人二尖瓣修复术。手术时的平均年龄为 62 岁,STS 风险评分为 0.58。98%的患者修复成功。有一名患者转为胸骨切开术。无死亡病例,围手术期发病率极低。在出院前和随访超声心动图检查中,没有患者出现轻度以上的二尖瓣反流:我们的工作为建立成功的机器人二尖瓣手术项目提供了一个范例。我们的工作为建立成功的机器人二尖瓣手术项目提供了范例。前期强调团队教育、精心准备、正确选择患者以及以反馈为导向的改进,可以加快达到大容量中心设定的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Donation after circulatory death versus donation after brain death longitudinal follow-up. Differential Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Spread Through Air Spaces According to Oncogenic Driver Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Type A aortic dissection during pregnancy and postpartum: Experience in 60 patients over 25 years. More is Not Better: The Role of the Leukocyte Filter in Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion. Commentary: Setting the Bar: Defining Benchmarks in Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1