Nicholas R Lenze, Ruby J Kazemi, Allison K Ikeda, Punithavathy Vijayakumar, Cathy A Goldstein, Jeffrey J Stanley, Michael J Brenner, Paul T Hoff
{"title":"Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.","authors":"Nicholas R Lenze, Ruby J Kazemi, Allison K Ikeda, Punithavathy Vijayakumar, Cathy A Goldstein, Jeffrey J Stanley, Michael J Brenner, Paul T Hoff","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To characterize public practices and perspectives on the use of consumer sleep technology (CST) and evaluate perspectives on using CST as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a survey instrument incorporating content from validated instruments (STOP-BANG and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and hypothesis-generated questions. Survey development involved multidisciplinary collaboration among three board-certified sleep medicine experts, researchers, and consumers. The survey was disseminated across a national sample of adults living in the United States via an online platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 897 respondents, the mean (SD) age was 47.5 (16.9) years; 73.1% were female, 81.8% were White, and 505 respondents (56.3%) reported having tracked sleep using CS. Factors associated with decreased odds of CST use included household income <$30,000 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.79; p=0.004), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.001), Medicare insurance (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p=0.004), and lack of a primary care physician (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91; p=0.021). Most respondents (91.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that screening for OSA would be a useful feature of CST, but respondents reporting an education of high school diploma or less (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79; p=0.004) were less likely to agree with this statement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attitudes toward and use of CST differed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand and address barriers to CST adoption and to characterize implications for equitable access to care for sleep disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objectives: To characterize public practices and perspectives on the use of consumer sleep technology (CST) and evaluate perspectives on using CST as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Methods: We designed a survey instrument incorporating content from validated instruments (STOP-BANG and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and hypothesis-generated questions. Survey development involved multidisciplinary collaboration among three board-certified sleep medicine experts, researchers, and consumers. The survey was disseminated across a national sample of adults living in the United States via an online platform.
Results: Among 897 respondents, the mean (SD) age was 47.5 (16.9) years; 73.1% were female, 81.8% were White, and 505 respondents (56.3%) reported having tracked sleep using CS. Factors associated with decreased odds of CST use included household income <$30,000 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.79; p=0.004), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.001), Medicare insurance (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p=0.004), and lack of a primary care physician (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91; p=0.021). Most respondents (91.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that screening for OSA would be a useful feature of CST, but respondents reporting an education of high school diploma or less (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79; p=0.004) were less likely to agree with this statement.
Conclusions: Attitudes toward and use of CST differed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand and address barriers to CST adoption and to characterize implications for equitable access to care for sleep disorders.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.