Efficacy and safety of HAIC-FOLFOX plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.061
Peng Jiang, Chao Chen, Jing Tian, Fan Yang, Zhen-Yu Jiang, An-Xiang Hu, Bin Liu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of HAIC-FOLFOX plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Peng Jiang, Chao Chen, Jing Tian, Fan Yang, Zhen-Yu Jiang, An-Xiang Hu, Bin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been treated with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both, however, the overall clinical efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), as a localized treatment modality, has demonstrated favorable therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced HCC accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus and extensive intrahepatic metastasis. In recent years, the combination of HAIC with immune and targeted therapy has gradually gained acceptance in East Asian countries. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of this triple therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies conducted within the past 5 years on HAIC combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted this meta-analysis. Additionally, the quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. Outcomes such as overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs)were extracted and pooled from eligible studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Twelve studies involving 1072 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 65.7% (95% CI, 58.7%-72.7%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 83%, P = 0.000) and 89.2% (95% CI, 83.9%-93.6%) (I<sup>2</sup> = 83%, P = 0.000), respectively. When analyzing PFS, the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of PFS in one study was not reached, which could potentially impact the statistical analysis. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 11 studies a total of 1019 patients to pool mPFS, ultimately the pooled mPFS was 9.77months (95% CI, 7.73-11.80) (I<sup>2</sup> = 93.9%, P = 0.000). Follow-up time in some studies was insufficient, only eight studies reported OS, we systematically analyzed these eight studies and extracted the pooled mOS was 16.65 months (95% CI, 14.17-19.14) (I<sup>2</sup> = 76.9%, P = 0.000). In terms of safety, the incidence rates of any grade AEs, ranked from high to low, were as follows: aminotransferase increased (61.3%), nausea and vomiting (40.5%), hypertension (37.8%), thrombocytopenia (37.4%), hyperbilirubinemia (36.7%), abdominal pain (35.6%), leukopenia (34.6%), hypothyroidism (19.0%), rash (14.4%). Grade 3-4 AEs ranked from high to low were as follows: aminotransferase increased (10.8%), thrombocytopenia (7.9%), hypertension (7.4%), leukopenia (5.0%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, patients receiving this triple therapy demonstrated favorable tolerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced HCC demonstrates promising therapeutic efficacy and favorable safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been treated with targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both, however, the overall clinical efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), as a localized treatment modality, has demonstrated favorable therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced HCC accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus and extensive intrahepatic metastasis. In recent years, the combination of HAIC with immune and targeted therapy has gradually gained acceptance in East Asian countries. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of this triple therapy.

Method: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies conducted within the past 5 years on HAIC combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted this meta-analysis. Additionally, the quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. Outcomes such as overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs)were extracted and pooled from eligible studies.

Result: Twelve studies involving 1072 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 65.7% (95% CI, 58.7%-72.7%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000) and 89.2% (95% CI, 83.9%-93.6%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000), respectively. When analyzing PFS, the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of PFS in one study was not reached, which could potentially impact the statistical analysis. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 11 studies a total of 1019 patients to pool mPFS, ultimately the pooled mPFS was 9.77months (95% CI, 7.73-11.80) (I2 = 93.9%, P = 0.000). Follow-up time in some studies was insufficient, only eight studies reported OS, we systematically analyzed these eight studies and extracted the pooled mOS was 16.65 months (95% CI, 14.17-19.14) (I2 = 76.9%, P = 0.000). In terms of safety, the incidence rates of any grade AEs, ranked from high to low, were as follows: aminotransferase increased (61.3%), nausea and vomiting (40.5%), hypertension (37.8%), thrombocytopenia (37.4%), hyperbilirubinemia (36.7%), abdominal pain (35.6%), leukopenia (34.6%), hypothyroidism (19.0%), rash (14.4%). Grade 3-4 AEs ranked from high to low were as follows: aminotransferase increased (10.8%), thrombocytopenia (7.9%), hypertension (7.4%), leukopenia (5.0%). No treatment-related deaths occurred, patients receiving this triple therapy demonstrated favorable tolerability.

Conclusion: The combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line therapy for unresectable advanced HCC demonstrates promising therapeutic efficacy and favorable safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HAIC-FOLFOX 加酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂作为不可切除的晚期肝细胞癌一线治疗的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)一直采用靶向治疗、免疫治疗或两者联合治疗,但总体临床疗效仍不理想。肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)作为一种局部治疗方式,对伴有门静脉瘤栓和广泛肝内转移的晚期 HCC 患者具有良好的疗效。近年来,HAIC 与免疫疗法和靶向疗法的结合在东亚国家逐渐被接受。然而,评估这种三联疗法的疗效和安全性还需要进一步的研究:方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库中系统检索过去5年内进行的关于HAIC联合免疫疗法和靶向疗法作为晚期HCC一线治疗的研究。根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,我们进行了这项荟萃分析。此外,我们还使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)量表对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。从符合条件的研究中提取并汇总了总反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)等结果:结果:本次荟萃分析共纳入了12项研究,涉及1072名患者。在肿瘤反应方面,汇总的 ORR 和 DCR 分别为 65.7% (95% CI, 58.7%-72.7%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000) 和 89.2% (95% CI, 83.9%-93.6%) (I2 = 83%, P = 0.000)。在分析 PFS 时,有一项研究的 PFS 未达到 95% 置信区间的上限,这可能会影响统计分析。因此,我们对其余11项研究共1019例患者的mPFS进行了汇总分析,最终汇总的mPFS为9.77个月(95% CI,7.73-11.80)(I2 = 93.9%,P = 0.000)。部分研究的随访时间不足,仅有8项研究报告了OS,我们对这8项研究进行了系统分析,提取的汇总mOS为16.65个月(95% CI,14.17-19.14)(I2=76.9%,P=0.000)。在安全性方面,任何级别AEs的发生率从高到低排列如下:转氨酶升高(61.3%)、恶心呕吐(40.5%)、高血压(37.8%)、血小板减少(37.4%)、高胆红素血症(36.7%)、腹痛(35.6%)、白细胞减少(34.6%)、甲状腺功能减退(19.0%)、皮疹(14.4%)。3-4 级 AE 由高到低排列如下:转氨酶升高(10.8%)、血小板减少(7.9%)、高血压(7.4%)、白细胞减少(5.0%)。没有发生与治疗相关的死亡病例,接受这种三联疗法的患者表现出良好的耐受性:结论:肝动脉灌注化疗联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂作为不可切除的晚期HCC的一线疗法具有良好的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Automatic Virtual Contrast-Enhanced CT Synthesis Using Dual-Energy CT and Residual U-Net with Attention Module for Detecting Pulmonary Hilar Lymphadenopathy. Evaluation of White Matter Integrity by Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Presbycusis. AI-Assisted Post Contrast Brain MRI: Eighty Percent Reduction in Contrast Dose. Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Second Reader on the Lung Nodule Detection and Localization Accuracy of Radiologists and Non-radiology Physicians in Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter Reader Study. Quantitative Parameters of Intravoxel Incoherent Movement Imaging and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement MRI for the Prediction of HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Breast Cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1