Fully Automated and Explainable Measurement of Liver Surface Nodularity in CT: Utility for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.050
Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Meghan G Lubner, Perry J Pickhardt, Ronald M Summers
{"title":"Fully Automated and Explainable Measurement of Liver Surface Nodularity in CT: Utility for Staging Hepatic Fibrosis.","authors":"Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Meghan G Lubner, Perry J Pickhardt, Ronald M Summers","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In the United States, cirrhosis was the 12th leading cause of death in 2016. Despite end-stage cirrhosis being irreversible, earlier stages of hepatic fibrosis can be reversed via early diagnosis and intervention. The objective is to investigate the utility of a fully automated technique to measure liver surface nodularity (LSN) for staging hepatic fibrosis (stages F0-F4).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a dataset consisting of patients with multiple etiologies of liver disease collected at Institution-A (METAVIR F0-F4, 2000-2016) was used. The LSN was automatically measured in contrast-enhanced CT volumes and compared against scores from a manual tool. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to distinguish between clinically significant fibrosis (≥ F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and end-stage cirrhosis (F4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample had 480 patients (304 men, 176 women, mean age, 49±9). Automatically derived LSN scores progressively increased with the fibrosis stage: F0 (1.64 [mean]±1.13 [standard deviation]), F1 (2.16±2.39), F2 (2.17±2.55), F3 (2.23±2.52), and F4 (4.21±2.94). For discriminating significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4), the automated tool achieved ROC AUCs of 73.9%, 82.5%, and 87.8% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for significant fibrosis (nodularity threshold 1.51) was 85.2% and 73.3%, advanced fibrosis (nodularity threshold 1.73) was 84.2% and 79.5%, and cirrhosis (nodularity threshold 2.18) was 86.5% and 79.5%. Statistical tests revealed that the automated LSN scores distinguished patients with advanced fibrosis (p<.001) and cirrhosis (p<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fully automated LSN measurement retained its predictive power for distinguishing between advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The clinical impact is that the fully automated LSN measurement may be useful for early interventions and population-based studies. It can automatically predict the fibrosis stage in ∼45 s in comparison to the ∼2 min needed to manually measure the LSN in a CT volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: In the United States, cirrhosis was the 12th leading cause of death in 2016. Despite end-stage cirrhosis being irreversible, earlier stages of hepatic fibrosis can be reversed via early diagnosis and intervention. The objective is to investigate the utility of a fully automated technique to measure liver surface nodularity (LSN) for staging hepatic fibrosis (stages F0-F4).

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, a dataset consisting of patients with multiple etiologies of liver disease collected at Institution-A (METAVIR F0-F4, 2000-2016) was used. The LSN was automatically measured in contrast-enhanced CT volumes and compared against scores from a manual tool. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to distinguish between clinically significant fibrosis (≥ F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and end-stage cirrhosis (F4).

Results: The study sample had 480 patients (304 men, 176 women, mean age, 49±9). Automatically derived LSN scores progressively increased with the fibrosis stage: F0 (1.64 [mean]±1.13 [standard deviation]), F1 (2.16±2.39), F2 (2.17±2.55), F3 (2.23±2.52), and F4 (4.21±2.94). For discriminating significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4), the automated tool achieved ROC AUCs of 73.9%, 82.5%, and 87.8% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for significant fibrosis (nodularity threshold 1.51) was 85.2% and 73.3%, advanced fibrosis (nodularity threshold 1.73) was 84.2% and 79.5%, and cirrhosis (nodularity threshold 2.18) was 86.5% and 79.5%. Statistical tests revealed that the automated LSN scores distinguished patients with advanced fibrosis (p<.001) and cirrhosis (p<.001).

Conclusion: The fully automated LSN measurement retained its predictive power for distinguishing between advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The clinical impact is that the fully automated LSN measurement may be useful for early interventions and population-based studies. It can automatically predict the fibrosis stage in ∼45 s in comparison to the ∼2 min needed to manually measure the LSN in a CT volume.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT 中肝脏表面结节性的全自动可解释测量:肝纤维化分期的实用性
理由和目标:在美国,肝硬化是 2016 年第 12 大死亡原因。尽管终末期肝硬化是不可逆的,但肝纤维化的早期阶段可以通过早期诊断和干预来逆转。本研究旨在探讨全自动肝表面结节度(LSN)测量技术在肝纤维化分期(F0-F4期)中的实用性:在这项回顾性研究中,使用了由 A 机构收集的多种病因肝病患者数据集(METAVIR F0-F4,2000-2016 年)。在对比增强 CT 图像中自动测量 LSN,并与手动工具的评分进行比较。接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)用于区分临床意义上的纤维化(≥F2)、晚期纤维化(≥F3)和终末期肝硬化(F4):研究样本有 480 名患者(男性 304 人,女性 176 人,平均年龄 49±9 岁)。自动得出的 LSN 分数随着纤维化阶段的增加而逐渐增加:F0(1.64[平均值]±1.13[标准差])、F1(2.16±2.39)、F2(2.17±2.55)、F3(2.23±2.52)和F4(4.21±2.94)。在鉴别明显纤维化(≥F2)、晚期纤维化(≥F3)和肝硬化(F4)时,自动工具的 ROC AUC 分别为 73.9%、82.5% 和 87.8%。显著纤维化(结节阈值 1.51)的敏感性和特异性分别为 85.2% 和 73.3%,晚期纤维化(结节阈值 1.73)的敏感性和特异性分别为 84.2% 和 79.5%,肝硬化(结节阈值 2.18)的敏感性和特异性分别为 86.5% 和 79.5%。统计测试表明,自动 LSN 评分可以区分晚期纤维化患者(p 结论:全自动 LSN 测量方法保留了其在肝硬化患者中的应用价值:全自动 LSN 测量在区分晚期纤维化和肝硬化方面仍具有预测能力。其临床意义在于,全自动 LSN 测量可用于早期干预和人群研究。与手动测量 CT 容量中的 LSN 所需的 2 分钟相比,它能在 45 秒内自动预测纤维化阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical-MRI, Radiomics, and Integrated Nomogram Models for Preoperative Prediction of Placenta Accreta Spectrum. Pulmonary 129Xe MRI: CNN Registration and Segmentation to Generate Ventilation Defect Percent with Multi-center Validation. Prognostic value of extracellular volume fraction in myocardial infarction and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: A multicenter study. Accelerated spine MRI with deep learning based image reconstruction: a prospective comparison with standard MRI. Beyond the Procedure: The Hidden Crisis of Moral Injury in Interventional Radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1