A model to increase care delivery in nursing homes: The role of Institutional Special Needs Plans.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14390
Amanda C Chen, David C Grabowski
{"title":"A model to increase care delivery in nursing homes: The role of Institutional Special Needs Plans.","authors":"Amanda C Chen, David C Grabowski","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate differences in facility-level outcomes between nursing homes which reached Institutional Special Needs Plan (I-SNP) maturity and those which never cared for I-SNP enrollees.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We used a difference-in-differences design to estimate the effect of I-SNP maturity, defined as having at least 33.75% of Medicare long-stayers in the nursing home enrolled in any I-SNP. Our main outcome was the hospitalization rate in each nursing home-year. Secondary outcomes included the share of residents with medication use, fall, urinary tract infection, catheter insertion, pressure ulcer, physical restraint use, increased need for help with activities of daily living (ADLs), and mortality.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>This repeated cross-sectional study used 100% Medicare claims, Minimum Data Set assessments, and publicly available Medicare Advantage (MA) plan characteristics data (2004-2021). We included all MA beneficiaries who resided in US nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity and those without I-SNP enrollees.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We identified 2530 nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity (treated) and 9830 nursing homes without I-SNP enrollees (untreated). There were some differences observed between these nursing homes, including shares of residents who were White (76.42% vs. 84.84%) and on Medicaid (66.94% vs. 55.45%). These nursing homes were also larger on average (141.76 beds vs. 87.56 beds). From the difference-in-differences model, nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity experienced declines of 4.1 percentage points (pp) for hospitalizations, 1.0 pp for pressure ulcers, 1.3 pp for urinary tract infections (p < 0.001) alongside increases in the need for help with ADLs, use of antipsychotics, falls, and physical restraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity experienced fewer hospitalizations and pressure ulcers but a decline in function and increase in other negative outcomes. I-SNPs may be a promising model to improve care for long-stay residents, but more research is needed to understand potential adverse consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate differences in facility-level outcomes between nursing homes which reached Institutional Special Needs Plan (I-SNP) maturity and those which never cared for I-SNP enrollees.

Study setting and design: We used a difference-in-differences design to estimate the effect of I-SNP maturity, defined as having at least 33.75% of Medicare long-stayers in the nursing home enrolled in any I-SNP. Our main outcome was the hospitalization rate in each nursing home-year. Secondary outcomes included the share of residents with medication use, fall, urinary tract infection, catheter insertion, pressure ulcer, physical restraint use, increased need for help with activities of daily living (ADLs), and mortality.

Data sources and analytic sample: This repeated cross-sectional study used 100% Medicare claims, Minimum Data Set assessments, and publicly available Medicare Advantage (MA) plan characteristics data (2004-2021). We included all MA beneficiaries who resided in US nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity and those without I-SNP enrollees.

Principal findings: We identified 2530 nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity (treated) and 9830 nursing homes without I-SNP enrollees (untreated). There were some differences observed between these nursing homes, including shares of residents who were White (76.42% vs. 84.84%) and on Medicaid (66.94% vs. 55.45%). These nursing homes were also larger on average (141.76 beds vs. 87.56 beds). From the difference-in-differences model, nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity experienced declines of 4.1 percentage points (pp) for hospitalizations, 1.0 pp for pressure ulcers, 1.3 pp for urinary tract infections (p < 0.001) alongside increases in the need for help with ADLs, use of antipsychotics, falls, and physical restraints.

Conclusions: Nursing homes which reached I-SNP maturity experienced fewer hospitalizations and pressure ulcers but a decline in function and increase in other negative outcomes. I-SNPs may be a promising model to improve care for long-stay residents, but more research is needed to understand potential adverse consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加养老院护理服务的模式:机构特殊需求计划的作用。
目的:估算达到机构特需计划(I-SNP)成熟度的疗养院与从未照顾过 I-SNP 参与者的疗养院在设施层面的成果差异:估算达到 "机构特殊需求计划"(I-SNP)成熟度的疗养院与从未照顾过 I-SNP 参与者的疗养院在设施层面的结果差异:我们采用差异设计来估算 I-SNP 成熟度的影响,I-SNP 成熟度的定义是疗养院中至少有 33.75% 的医疗保险长期住院患者参加了任何 I-SNP。我们的主要结果是每个疗养院年的住院率。次要结果包括住院患者中用药、跌倒、尿路感染、插入导尿管、压疮、使用物理约束、日常生活活动(ADLs)需要更多帮助以及死亡率的比例:这项重复性横断面研究使用了 100% 的医疗保险报销单、最低数据集评估以及公开的医疗保险优势(MA)计划特征数据(2004-2021 年)。我们纳入了所有居住在达到 I-SNP 成熟度的美国养老院和没有 I-SNP 参与者的养老院的 MA 受益人:我们确定了 2530 家达到 I-SNP 成熟度的疗养院(已处理)和 9830 家没有 I-SNP 参与者的疗养院(未处理)。我们观察到这些疗养院之间存在一些差异,其中包括白种人(76.42% 对 84.84%)和医疗补助(66.94% 对 55.45%)居民的比例。这些养老院的平均规模也较大(141.76 张床位对 87.56 张床位)。根据差异模型,达到 I-SNP 成熟度的疗养院的住院率下降了 4.1 个百分点(pp),压疮下降了 1.0 个百分点,尿路感染下降了 1.3 个百分点(pp 结论):达到 I-SNP 成熟度的疗养院住院率和压疮发生率较低,但功能下降,其他负面结果增加。I-SNP 可能是改善长期住院者护理的一种有前途的模式,但还需要更多的研究来了解潜在的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the "Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook". Connecting unstably housed veterans living in rural areas to health care: Perspectives from Health Care Navigators. A structured approach to modifying an implementation package while scaling up a complex evidence-based practice. Evaluation of regional variation in racial and ethnic differences in patient experience among Veterans Health Administration primary care users. Effect of mental health staffing inputs on initiation of care among recently separated Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1