Back together: Over 1000 single-copy nuclear loci and reproductive features support the holoendoparasitic Apodanthaceae and Rafflesiaceae as sister lineages in the order Malpighiales

IF 3.6 1区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108217
Juan F. Alzate , Favio A. González , Natalia Pabón-Mora
{"title":"Back together: Over 1000 single-copy nuclear loci and reproductive features support the holoendoparasitic Apodanthaceae and Rafflesiaceae as sister lineages in the order Malpighiales","authors":"Juan F. Alzate ,&nbsp;Favio A. González ,&nbsp;Natalia Pabón-Mora","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The systematics of the holoendoparasitic flowering plant families Apodanthaceae and Rafflesiaceae has been discussed for over two centuries. The morphological reduction of roots, shoots and leaves in all members of both families, resulting in a cryptic mycelium-like vegetative body, has been interpreted either as a key common feature, or as a result of convergent evolution due to full dependence upon their hosts. Historically, the two families have been placed together due to similar morphological features, but recent analyses based on few mitochondrial and ribosomal gene markers placed them in the distantly related orders Cucurbitales and Malpighiales. Here we reevaluate the affinities of the Apodanthaceae and the Rafflesiaceae using a phylogenomic approach. We present (1) a historical account on their affinities over the last 200 years; (2) phylogenetic analyses reinstating their sister group relationship as part of the order Malpighiales, based on over 1000 single-copy nuclear protein-coding loci; and (3) a comprehensive list of putative morphoanatomical and developmental synapomorphies in light of the phylogenomic results, with emphasis on shared reproductive traits regardless of dramatic differences in floral size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790324002094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systematics of the holoendoparasitic flowering plant families Apodanthaceae and Rafflesiaceae has been discussed for over two centuries. The morphological reduction of roots, shoots and leaves in all members of both families, resulting in a cryptic mycelium-like vegetative body, has been interpreted either as a key common feature, or as a result of convergent evolution due to full dependence upon their hosts. Historically, the two families have been placed together due to similar morphological features, but recent analyses based on few mitochondrial and ribosomal gene markers placed them in the distantly related orders Cucurbitales and Malpighiales. Here we reevaluate the affinities of the Apodanthaceae and the Rafflesiaceae using a phylogenomic approach. We present (1) a historical account on their affinities over the last 200 years; (2) phylogenetic analyses reinstating their sister group relationship as part of the order Malpighiales, based on over 1000 single-copy nuclear protein-coding loci; and (3) a comprehensive list of putative morphoanatomical and developmental synapomorphies in light of the phylogenomic results, with emphasis on shared reproductive traits regardless of dramatic differences in floral size.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回到一起超过 1000 个单拷贝核基因位点和生殖特征支持全内寄生的 Apodanthaceae 与 Malpighiales 目中的 Rafflesiaceae 为姐妹。
两个多世纪以来,人们一直在讨论全缘寄生开花植物科(Apodanthaceae 和 Rafflesiaceae)的系统学问题。这两个科所有成员的根、芽和叶在形态上都有所减少,形成了隐蔽的菌丝状无性繁殖体,这被解释为一个关键的共同特征,或者是由于完全依赖寄主而趋同进化的结果。从历史上看,这两个科由于形态特征相似而被放在一起,但最近基于少数线粒体和核糖体基因标记的分析将它们归入关系较远的葫芦科(Cucurbitales)和马鞭草科(Malpighiales)。在此,我们采用系统发生组学方法重新评估了蔷薇科(Apodanthaceae)和红花楹科(Rafflesiaceae)的亲缘关系。我们介绍了:(1)过去 200 年中关于其系统发育亲缘关系的历史描述;(2)基于 1000 多个单拷贝核蛋白编码位点的系统发育分析,恢复了它们作为 Malpighiales 目一部分的姊妹群关系;以及(3)根据系统发育组学的结果,列出了推测的形态解剖学和发育同形异构体的综合清单,重点是共同的生殖性状,而不考虑花朵大小的巨大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
249
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.
期刊最新文献
Molecular phylogenetics of nursery web spiders (Araneae: Pisauridae). Phylogenetic origin of dioecious Callicarpa (Lamiaceae) species endemic to the Ogasawara Islands revealed by chloroplast and nuclear whole genome analyses. Reassessing the evolutionary relationships of tropical wandering spiders using phylogenomics: A UCE-based phylogeny of Ctenidae (Araneae) with the discovery of a new lycosoid family. Phylogenomics resolves the puzzling phylogeny of banded newts (genus Ommatotriton). A genomic approach to Porites (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) megadiversity from the Indo-Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1