Last minute cancellation of elective lung cancer surgery is associated with poorer survival.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae172
Marco Nardini, Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Joshil Lodhia, Richard Milton, Peter Tcherveniakov, Elaine Teh, Alessandro Brunelli
{"title":"Last minute cancellation of elective lung cancer surgery is associated with poorer survival.","authors":"Marco Nardini, Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Joshil Lodhia, Richard Milton, Peter Tcherveniakov, Elaine Teh, Alessandro Brunelli","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to assess the incidence and reason of last-minute cancellations before surgery for lung cancer and their association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis on all consecutive patients booked for elective lung cancer surgery from January 2017 through December 2022 in a single centre.Last minute cancellation: a cancellation occurring within the last 24 hours from the planned operation. Cancellation categories: process-related and patient-related.The short-term and long-term outcomes of patients who experienced a last-minute cancellation were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>197 patients of 1587 (12%) had a last-minute cancellation: 156 (79%) were process-related and 41 (21%) were patient-related.3% (5/156) of patients cancelled for process reasons did not receive surgery vs 39% (16/41) of those cancelled for patient-related reasons, p < 0.0001.The 90-day mortality rates of cancelled and non-cancelled patients were similar (4.6% vs 4.7%, p = 1).Five-year overall survival of patients with cancellation was 58% (95% CI 49-66) vs 69% (95% CI 66-71) of those without cancellations, p = 0.022.Among those who had a cancellation, the 5-year OS of those with process-related cancellations was 61% (52-60) vs 35% (14-58) of those with patient-related cancellations (adjusted p value for multiple comparisons = 0.14).Cox regression analysis showed that surgery cancellations within the last 24 hours for patient-related (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.02-3.42, p = 0.043) reasons remained a factor associated with poorer overall survival after adjusting for clinical stage, type of operation and patient related variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the patient's preoperative clinical evaluation to reduce the occurrence of related last-minute cancellations might mitigate its negative impact on survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to assess the incidence and reason of last-minute cancellations before surgery for lung cancer and their association with outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective analysis on all consecutive patients booked for elective lung cancer surgery from January 2017 through December 2022 in a single centre.Last minute cancellation: a cancellation occurring within the last 24 hours from the planned operation. Cancellation categories: process-related and patient-related.The short-term and long-term outcomes of patients who experienced a last-minute cancellation were analysed.

Results: 197 patients of 1587 (12%) had a last-minute cancellation: 156 (79%) were process-related and 41 (21%) were patient-related.3% (5/156) of patients cancelled for process reasons did not receive surgery vs 39% (16/41) of those cancelled for patient-related reasons, p < 0.0001.The 90-day mortality rates of cancelled and non-cancelled patients were similar (4.6% vs 4.7%, p = 1).Five-year overall survival of patients with cancellation was 58% (95% CI 49-66) vs 69% (95% CI 66-71) of those without cancellations, p = 0.022.Among those who had a cancellation, the 5-year OS of those with process-related cancellations was 61% (52-60) vs 35% (14-58) of those with patient-related cancellations (adjusted p value for multiple comparisons = 0.14).Cox regression analysis showed that surgery cancellations within the last 24 hours for patient-related (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.02-3.42, p = 0.043) reasons remained a factor associated with poorer overall survival after adjusting for clinical stage, type of operation and patient related variables.

Conclusions: Implementing the patient's preoperative clinical evaluation to reduce the occurrence of related last-minute cancellations might mitigate its negative impact on survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最后一刻取消肺癌择期手术与生存率较低有关。
目的我们的目的是评估肺癌术前最后一分钟取消手术的发生率、原因及其与预后的关系:方法:对一个中心从2017年1月至2022年12月期间所有连续预约肺癌择期手术的患者进行回顾性分析。取消类别:与流程相关和与患者相关。分析了最后一分钟取消手术的患者的短期和长期结果:结果:1587 名患者中有 197 名(12%)在最后一刻取消了手术:3%(5/156)因流程原因取消手术的患者未接受手术,而39%(16/41)因患者原因取消手术的患者未接受手术:对患者进行术前临床评估以减少最后一刻取消手术的情况发生,可能会减轻其对生存率的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of superior trunk brachial plexus injury after right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve repair. Association between preoperative D-dimer with morphologic features and surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection. Defining the causes for Fontan circulatory failure in total cavopulmonary connection patients. Risk of neurologic events after surgery for mitral valve insufficiency and concomitant cox-maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. A nationwide register-based study. Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a world-first approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1