Artificial intelligence in mammography: a systematic review of the external validation.

Paulo Eduardo Souza Castelo Branco, Adriane Helena Silva Franco, Amanda Prates de Oliveira, Isabela Maurício Costa Carneiro, Luciana Maurício Costa de Carvalho, Jonathan Igor Nunes de Souza, Danniel Rodrigo Leandro, Eduardo Batista Cândido
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in mammography: a systematic review of the external validation.","authors":"Paulo Eduardo Souza Castelo Branco, Adriane Helena Silva Franco, Amanda Prates de Oliveira, Isabela Maurício Costa Carneiro, Luciana Maurício Costa de Carvalho, Jonathan Igor Nunes de Souza, Danniel Rodrigo Leandro, Eduardo Batista Cândido","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review of external validation studies on the use of different Artificial Intelligence algorithms in breast cancer screening with mammography.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Our systematic review was conducted and reported following the PRISMA statement, using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the search terms \"Artificial Intelligence,\" \"Mammography,\" and their respective MeSH terms. We filtered publications from the past ten years (2014 - 2024) and in English.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>A total of 1,878 articles were found in the databases used in the research. After removing duplicates (373) and excluding those that did not address our PICO question (1,475), 30 studies were included in this work.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>The data from the studies were collected independently by five authors, and it was subsequently synthesized based on sample data, location, year, and their main results in terms of AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>It was demonstrated that the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and sensitivity were similar to those of radiologists when using independent Artificial Intelligence. When used in conjunction with radiologists, statistically higher accuracy in mammogram evaluation was reported compared to the assessment by radiologists alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI algorithms have emerged as a means to complement and enhance the performance and accuracy of radiologists. They also assist less experienced professionals in detecting possible lesions. Furthermore, this tool can be used to complement and improve the analyses conducted by medical professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of external validation studies on the use of different Artificial Intelligence algorithms in breast cancer screening with mammography.

Data source: Our systematic review was conducted and reported following the PRISMA statement, using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the search terms "Artificial Intelligence," "Mammography," and their respective MeSH terms. We filtered publications from the past ten years (2014 - 2024) and in English.

Study selection: A total of 1,878 articles were found in the databases used in the research. After removing duplicates (373) and excluding those that did not address our PICO question (1,475), 30 studies were included in this work.

Data collection: The data from the studies were collected independently by five authors, and it was subsequently synthesized based on sample data, location, year, and their main results in terms of AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.

Data synthesis: It was demonstrated that the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and sensitivity were similar to those of radiologists when using independent Artificial Intelligence. When used in conjunction with radiologists, statistically higher accuracy in mammogram evaluation was reported compared to the assessment by radiologists alone.

Conclusion: AI algorithms have emerged as a means to complement and enhance the performance and accuracy of radiologists. They also assist less experienced professionals in detecting possible lesions. Furthermore, this tool can be used to complement and improve the analyses conducted by medical professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺 X 射线摄影中的人工智能:外部验证的系统性回顾。
目的对不同人工智能算法在乳腺 X 射线摄影乳腺癌筛查中的应用进行外部验证研究的系统性综述:我们按照 PRISMA 声明,使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,以 "人工智能"、"乳腺 X 线照相术 "及其各自的 MeSH 术语为检索词,进行了系统性综述和报告。我们筛选了过去十年(2014 - 2024 年)内的英文出版物:在研究使用的数据库中共找到 1,878 篇文章。在去除重复文章(373 篇)和排除那些不涉及我们的 PICO 问题的文章(1,475 篇)后,有 30 项研究被纳入这项工作:数据收集:研究数据由五位作者独立收集,随后根据样本数据、地点、年份及其在AUC、灵敏度和特异性方面的主要结果进行综合:结果表明,在独立使用人工智能时,ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)和灵敏度与放射科医生的结果相似。与放射科医生联合使用时,与放射科医生单独评估相比,乳房X光检查评估的准确性在统计学上更高:结论:人工智能算法已成为补充和提高放射科医生工作效率和准确性的一种手段。它们还能帮助经验不足的专业人员检测可能存在的病变。此外,该工具还可用于补充和改进医疗专业人员进行的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Syphilis and pregnancy. Immunosuppressants in women with repeated implantation failure in assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multidisciplinary team training in postpartum hemorrhage: impact on the use of blood products. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of mRNA versus Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A new screening of preterm birth in gestation with short cervix after pessary plus progesterone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1