Association between dietary patterns and infant birth weight in brazilian pregnancy women with gestational diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

Luciana da Cunha Bernardes Argenta, Nadya Helena Alves Dos Santos, Cláudia Saunders, Joana Dias da Costa, Letícia Victoria Souza da Cunha, Pamela Melo Krok Fedeszen, Patricia de Carvalho Padilha
{"title":"Association between dietary patterns and infant birth weight in brazilian pregnancy women with gestational diabetes: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Luciana da Cunha Bernardes Argenta, Nadya Helena Alves Dos Santos, Cláudia Saunders, Joana Dias da Costa, Letícia Victoria Souza da Cunha, Pamela Melo Krok Fedeszen, Patricia de Carvalho Padilha","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between the dietary patterns (DPs) of pregnant women with GDM (gestational diabetes <i>mellitus</i>) and the birth weight (BW) of the infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study with 187 adult pregnant women with GDM attended at a maternity in Rio de Janeiro from 2011 to 2014. Dietary intake was assessed in the third trimester using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The outcomes were BW and weight adequacy for gestational age (GA). Reduced Rank Regression (RRR) was used to explain the following response variables: density of carbohydrates, fibres, and saturated fatty acids. Statistical analyzes included multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean BW was 3261.9 (± 424.5) g. Three DPs were identified, with DP 3 (high consumption of refined carbohydrates, fast foods/snacks, whole milk, sugars/sweets, and soft drinks and low consumption of beans, vegetables, and low-fat milk and derivatives) being the main pattern, explaining 48.37% of the response variables. In the multinomial logistic regression analysis no statistically significant association was found between the tertiles of DPs and BW or the adequacy of weight for GA, even after adjustments of confounding covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant associations were found between maternal DPs in the third trimester of pregnancy and infant BW or adequacy of weight for GA.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"46 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between the dietary patterns (DPs) of pregnant women with GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus) and the birth weight (BW) of the infants.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with 187 adult pregnant women with GDM attended at a maternity in Rio de Janeiro from 2011 to 2014. Dietary intake was assessed in the third trimester using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The outcomes were BW and weight adequacy for gestational age (GA). Reduced Rank Regression (RRR) was used to explain the following response variables: density of carbohydrates, fibres, and saturated fatty acids. Statistical analyzes included multinomial logistic regression models.

Results: The mean BW was 3261.9 (± 424.5) g. Three DPs were identified, with DP 3 (high consumption of refined carbohydrates, fast foods/snacks, whole milk, sugars/sweets, and soft drinks and low consumption of beans, vegetables, and low-fat milk and derivatives) being the main pattern, explaining 48.37% of the response variables. In the multinomial logistic regression analysis no statistically significant association was found between the tertiles of DPs and BW or the adequacy of weight for GA, even after adjustments of confounding covariates.

Conclusion: No significant associations were found between maternal DPs in the third trimester of pregnancy and infant BW or adequacy of weight for GA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西妊娠糖尿病孕妇的饮食模式与婴儿出生体重之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
目的评估妊娠糖尿病孕妇的饮食模式(DPs)与婴儿出生体重(BW)之间的关系:横断面研究:2011 年至 2014 年期间,里约热内卢一家妇产医院对 187 名患有妊娠期糖尿病的成年孕妇进行了研究。采用半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)对怀孕三个月时的饮食摄入量进行评估。结果为体重和胎龄体重充足率(GA)。还原秩回归(RRR)用于解释以下反应变量:碳水化合物、纤维和饱和脂肪酸的密度。统计分析包括多项式逻辑回归模型:平均体重为 3261.9(± 424.5)克。确定了三个 DP,其中 DP 3(精制碳水化合物、快餐/零食、全脂牛奶、糖/甜食和软饮料的高消费量,以及豆类、蔬菜和低脂牛奶及其衍生物的低消费量)是主要模式,解释了 48.37% 的响应变量。在多项式逻辑回归分析中,即使在调整了混杂的协变量后,也没有发现DPs的三等分位数与体重或体重是否适合GA之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联:结论:妊娠三个月的母体DPs与婴儿体重或体重是否适合生长激素之间没有发现明显的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of vaginal microbiota before and after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Comment on: Effect of combined training on body image, body composition and functional capacity in patients with breast cancer: controlled clinical trial. Comment on: Effects of COVID-19 on human placentas in the second and third trimester. Female genital tract microbiome: the influence of probiotics on assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1