Association between initial antibiotic route and outcomes for children hospitalized with pneumonia.

Jillian M Cotter, Isabella Zaniletti, Derek J Williams, Sriram Ramgopal, Cristin Q Fritz, Maia Taft, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Temte, Justine Stassun, Krishna Trivedi, Jack Kapes, Jack Lavey, Allison Kempe, Lilliam Ambroggio
{"title":"Association between initial antibiotic route and outcomes for children hospitalized with pneumonia.","authors":"Jillian M Cotter, Isabella Zaniletti, Derek J Williams, Sriram Ramgopal, Cristin Q Fritz, Maia Taft, Matt Hall, Elizabeth Temte, Justine Stassun, Krishna Trivedi, Jack Kapes, Jack Lavey, Allison Kempe, Lilliam Ambroggio","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initial oral antibiotics may be as effective as intravenous (IV) antibiotics for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated for associations of initial antibiotic route (IV vs. oral) with length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes for children hospitalized with CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included children with CAP who were hospitalized for >48 h, had chest radiographs, and received antibiotics at four children's hospitals between 2014 and 2020. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System and manual chart review. The exposure was initial antibiotic route (i.e., first antibiotic given intravenously or orally). We performed multivariable regression modeling using inverse probability treatment weights from propensity scores. Outcomes included LOS, oxygen duration, cost, care escalation, and readmission or emergency department revisit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1147 included children, 37% received initial oral antibiotics. Within the propensity balanced sample, LOS was 73.5 h (IQR 61.0, 99.5) and 78.7 (61.0, 118.0) for patients with initial oral and IV antibiotics, respectively. Children receiving initial oral antibiotics had an 8% reduction in LOS (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]) and 14% reduction in cost (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94]) versus those receiving initial IV antibiotics. There were no differences in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with CAP receiving initial oral antibiotics had reduced LOS and hospital cost without differences in escalated care or return visits. Starting hospitalized children on oral antibiotics is likely a safe and effective alternative to IV treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Initial oral antibiotics may be as effective as intravenous (IV) antibiotics for children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed.

Objective: We evaluated for associations of initial antibiotic route (IV vs. oral) with length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes for children hospitalized with CAP.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included children with CAP who were hospitalized for >48 h, had chest radiographs, and received antibiotics at four children's hospitals between 2014 and 2020. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System and manual chart review. The exposure was initial antibiotic route (i.e., first antibiotic given intravenously or orally). We performed multivariable regression modeling using inverse probability treatment weights from propensity scores. Outcomes included LOS, oxygen duration, cost, care escalation, and readmission or emergency department revisit.

Results: Of 1147 included children, 37% received initial oral antibiotics. Within the propensity balanced sample, LOS was 73.5 h (IQR 61.0, 99.5) and 78.7 (61.0, 118.0) for patients with initial oral and IV antibiotics, respectively. Children receiving initial oral antibiotics had an 8% reduction in LOS (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]) and 14% reduction in cost (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94]) versus those receiving initial IV antibiotics. There were no differences in other outcomes.

Conclusions: Children with CAP receiving initial oral antibiotics had reduced LOS and hospital cost without differences in escalated care or return visits. Starting hospitalized children on oral antibiotics is likely a safe and effective alternative to IV treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺炎住院患儿最初使用抗生素的途径与治疗效果之间的关系。
背景:对于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患儿,初始口服抗生素可能与静脉注射抗生素同样有效,但还需要进一步的数据:我们评估了初始抗生素使用途径(静脉注射与口服)与 CAP 住院患儿的住院时间(LOS)和次要结果之间的关系:这项多中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了 2014 年至 2020 年期间在四家儿童医院住院超过 48 小时、接受过胸部影像检查并接受过抗生素治疗的 CAP 患儿。数据来自儿科健康信息系统和人工病历审查。暴露为初始抗生素途径(即首次静脉注射或口服抗生素)。我们使用倾向评分中的反概率治疗权重进行了多变量回归建模。结果包括住院时间、吸氧时间、费用、护理升级、再入院或急诊科复诊:结果:在纳入的 1147 名儿童中,37% 接受了初始口服抗生素治疗。在倾向平衡样本中,首次使用口服抗生素和静脉注射抗生素的患者的生命周期分别为 73.5 小时(IQR 61.0,99.5)和 78.7 小时(61.0,118.0)。与最初使用静脉注射抗生素的患儿相比,最初使用口服抗生素的患儿的生命周期缩短了 8%(OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]),费用降低了 14%(OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.79, 0.94])。其他结果没有差异:结论:接受初始口服抗生素治疗的 CAP 患儿缩短了住院时间,降低了住院费用,但在护理升级或复诊方面没有差异。让住院儿童开始口服抗生素可能是静脉注射治疗的一种安全有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study. Guideline concordance of electronic health record order sets for hospital-based treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Methodological progress note: Purposeful sampling in qualitative research. Streamlining diuresis: A quality improvement approach to implementing a sodium-based predictive diuresis protocol. From rounds to retweets: A digital media fellowship perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1