A Critical Review of the Energy Charter Treaty from an Earth System Law Perspective

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Transnational Environmental Law Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1017/s2047102524000244
Endrius Cocciolo, Leonie Reins
{"title":"A Critical Review of the Energy Charter Treaty from an Earth System Law Perspective","authors":"Endrius Cocciolo, Leonie Reins","doi":"10.1017/s2047102524000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is one of the best-known and most controversial of the international investment treaties. The energy transition necessary to achieve the Paris Agreement climate target will require large and sustained flows of investment capital. Scholars, environmentalists, industry representatives, and governmental officials have intensively debated the modernization of the ECT. The main point of contention is whether the ECT can facilitate the energy transition or whether it entrenches fossil lock-in in unsustainable and unjust ways. This article proposes a comprehensive and integrated approach to the ECT, guided by the theoretical matrix of Earth system law scholarship. Our analysis reveals that the ECT cannot address contemporary socio-ecological challenges, but rather it remains a sectoral piece of a supranational economic constitution far removed from the most pressing exigencies of the Anthropocene.</p>","PeriodicalId":45716,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Environmental Law","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102524000244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is one of the best-known and most controversial of the international investment treaties. The energy transition necessary to achieve the Paris Agreement climate target will require large and sustained flows of investment capital. Scholars, environmentalists, industry representatives, and governmental officials have intensively debated the modernization of the ECT. The main point of contention is whether the ECT can facilitate the energy transition or whether it entrenches fossil lock-in in unsustainable and unjust ways. This article proposes a comprehensive and integrated approach to the ECT, guided by the theoretical matrix of Earth system law scholarship. Our analysis reveals that the ECT cannot address contemporary socio-ecological challenges, but rather it remains a sectoral piece of a supranational economic constitution far removed from the most pressing exigencies of the Anthropocene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从地球系统法的角度对《能源宪章条约》进行批判性审查
能源宪章条约》(ECT)是国际投资条约中最著名、最具争议性的条约之一。实现《巴黎协定》气候目标所需的能源转型需要大量、持续的投资资本流动。学者、环保人士、行业代表和政府官员就 ECT 的现代化问题展开了激烈辩论。争论的焦点在于,《经济合作条约》是能促进能源转型,还是以不可持续和不公正的方式固化了化石锁定。本文以地球系统法学术研究的理论基石为指导,提出了一种全面、综合的 ECT 方法。我们的分析表明,《能源条约》无法应对当代社会生态挑战,相反,它仍然是超国家经济宪法中的一个部门性文件,与人类世最紧迫的需求相去甚远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.30%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
The Role of Epistemic Communities in Formulating EU Policy: The PrecisionTox Project The Role of Science and Historiography in the Development of Transnational Environmental Law: A New History of the 1900 London Convention for the Preservation of African Wildlife Echoes Through Time: Transforming Climate Litigation Narratives on Future Generations Hope-Bearing Legislation? The Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Transnational Governance of Soybean Land Use in South America: A Polycentric Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1