Development and validation of nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival among patients aged 80 and above with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY ANZ Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1111/ans.19266
Qiang Guo, Yuan He, Shai Chen, Sheng Hu, Silin Wang, Lang Su, Wenxiong Zhang, Jianjun Xu, Yiping Wei, Guiping Luo
{"title":"Development and validation of nomogram for predicting the cancer-specific survival among patients aged 80 and above with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Qiang Guo, Yuan He, Shai Chen, Sheng Hu, Silin Wang, Lang Su, Wenxiong Zhang, Jianjun Xu, Yiping Wei, Guiping Luo","doi":"10.1111/ans.19266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of nomograms in predicting the prognosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in elderly patients, is not widespread. A validated prognostic model specifically for NSCLC patients over 80 years old holds promising potential for clinical application in forecasting patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prognostic value of various factors for NSCLC patients aged 80 and above was evaluated using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2017). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and nomogram were utilized to evaluate the impact of each factor on cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort comprising 7045 individuals was selected for inclusion in the analysis. Through rigorous statistical analysis, 10 independent prognostic factors were identified and incorporated into the nomogram. The nomogram's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of the AJCC 7th edition TNM staging system's predicted CSS (0.744 versus 0.602), establishing the superior prognostic value of the nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have successfully created a highly accurate and discriminative nomogram that enables oncologists to predict the survival outcome of each individual patient with I/II NSCLC who is 80 years or older.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of nomograms in predicting the prognosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in elderly patients, is not widespread. A validated prognostic model specifically for NSCLC patients over 80 years old holds promising potential for clinical application in forecasting patient outcomes.

Methods: The prognostic value of various factors for NSCLC patients aged 80 and above was evaluated using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2017). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and nomogram were utilized to evaluate the impact of each factor on cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: A cohort comprising 7045 individuals was selected for inclusion in the analysis. Through rigorous statistical analysis, 10 independent prognostic factors were identified and incorporated into the nomogram. The nomogram's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of the AJCC 7th edition TNM staging system's predicted CSS (0.744 versus 0.602), establishing the superior prognostic value of the nomogram.

Conclusions: We have successfully created a highly accurate and discriminative nomogram that enables oncologists to predict the survival outcome of each individual patient with I/II NSCLC who is 80 years or older.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证用于预测 80 岁及以上早期非小细胞肺癌患者癌症特异性生存期的提名图。
背景:在预测早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)预后,尤其是老年患者的预后方面,提名图的应用并不广泛。一个专门针对 80 岁以上 NSCLC 患者的经过验证的预后模型有望在临床应用中预测患者的预后:方法:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010-2017 年)的数据,评估了 80 岁及以上 NSCLC 患者各种因素的预后价值。研究利用卡普兰-梅耶(KM)曲线、考克斯比例危险回归模型和提名图来评估各因素对癌症特异性生存率(CSS)的影响:分析选取了由 7045 人组成的队列。通过严格的统计分析,确定了 10 个独立的预后因素,并将其纳入提名图。提名图的接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)高于AJCC第7版TNM分期系统预测的CSS(0.744对0.602),从而确定了提名图更优越的预后价值:我们成功地创建了一个高度准确且具有鉴别力的提名图,使肿瘤学家能够预测每位 80 岁或以上 I/II 型 NSCLC 患者的生存预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence measured 3D lumbosacral body composition and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to compression stocking use in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Does admission to intensive care post total joint arthroplasty result in poorer outcomes 12-months after surgery? Fear 'filled' complication: intravascular hyaluronic acid filler injection and tissue necrosis. Is routine axillary staging still required in clinically node negative early breast cancer in women over 74 years?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1