The case of dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens: Is it always useful to double the drug doses?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY British journal of clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1111/bcp.16306
{"title":"The case of dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens: Is it always useful to double the drug doses?","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>27</b></p><p><b>The case of dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens: Is it always useful to double the drug doses?</b></p><p>Dario Cattaneo<sup>1</sup>, Anna Ridolfo<sup>1</sup>, Andrea Giacomelli<sup>1</sup>, Antonella Castagna<sup>2</sup>, Spinello Antinori<sup>1</sup> and Cristina Gervasoni<sup>1</sup></p><p><sup>1</sup><i>Luigi Sacco University Hospital;</i> <sup>2</sup><i>IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute</i></p><p><b>Background:</b> It has recently been shown that dolutegravir trough concentrations are differently affected by antiretroviral drug combinations [doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003843]. Here, we focused on dolutegravir plus darunavir-based combinations, with the aim to investigate the effect of the booster and/or the timing of administration on drug plasma trough concentrations.</p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> This retrospective, observational study included consecutive PWH receiving dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens for at least 3 months, with at least one assessment of dolutegravir plasma concentrations. We considered true trough drug concentrations (i.e. blood samples taken 12 or 24 h after the last drug intake) or trough concentrations back-estimated by pharmacokinetic modelling taking into account the time interval between the last dose intake and the blood sample and the drug terminal half-life. Samples without clear information on the timing of the last drug dose and/or blood draw were excluded from the study. PWH concomitantly treated with strong drug inducers (i.e. rifampicin, carbamazepine, NNRTIs) were not included.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Two hundred TDMs of dolutegravir from 116 PWH were included in the statistical analyses. Dolutegravir and darunavir trough concentrations ranged, respectively, from 70 to 3648 ng/mL (inter-individual variability of 60%) and from 102 to 11 876 ng/mL (inter-individual variability of 72%). As shown in Table 2, the antiretroviral drug combination associated with the highest dolutegravir trough concentration was dolutegravir plus darunavir/cobicistat, both given once daily (1410 ± 788 ng/mL), whereas dolutegravir once daily plus darunavir/ritonavir twice daily had the lowest trough concentrations (686 ± 481 ng/mL). Doubling the dose of dolutegravir did not result in a significant increase of drug trough concentrations compared to once daily regimens. Among the once daily regimens, the highest darunavir trough concentrations were measured with ritonavir (2850 ± 1456 ng/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; .05 <i>vs</i>. cobicistat-based regimens). Doubling the drug dose resulted in a significant increase of darunavir trough concentrations (4445 ± 2926 ng/mL, <i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Dolutegravir trough concentrations were significantly reduced in PWH receiving darunavir/ritonavir twice daily. This is likely related to the inductive effect of ritonavir (but not of cobicistat) on the enzymes (glucuronosyltransferase) and/or drug transporters involved in the regulation of dolutegravir disposition [doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx055]. Doubling the dose of dolutegravir did not result in a significant increase in the drug trough concentrations. This evidence should be carefully considered in clinical conditions that require higher dolutegravir exposure, such as in presence of DDIs with medications known to reduce dolutegravir bioavailability or in highly experienced PWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"90 S1","pages":"19-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

27

The case of dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens: Is it always useful to double the drug doses?

Dario Cattaneo1, Anna Ridolfo1, Andrea Giacomelli1, Antonella Castagna2, Spinello Antinori1 and Cristina Gervasoni1

1Luigi Sacco University Hospital; 2IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Background: It has recently been shown that dolutegravir trough concentrations are differently affected by antiretroviral drug combinations [doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003843]. Here, we focused on dolutegravir plus darunavir-based combinations, with the aim to investigate the effect of the booster and/or the timing of administration on drug plasma trough concentrations.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, observational study included consecutive PWH receiving dolutegravir plus darunavir antiretroviral regimens for at least 3 months, with at least one assessment of dolutegravir plasma concentrations. We considered true trough drug concentrations (i.e. blood samples taken 12 or 24 h after the last drug intake) or trough concentrations back-estimated by pharmacokinetic modelling taking into account the time interval between the last dose intake and the blood sample and the drug terminal half-life. Samples without clear information on the timing of the last drug dose and/or blood draw were excluded from the study. PWH concomitantly treated with strong drug inducers (i.e. rifampicin, carbamazepine, NNRTIs) were not included.

Results: Two hundred TDMs of dolutegravir from 116 PWH were included in the statistical analyses. Dolutegravir and darunavir trough concentrations ranged, respectively, from 70 to 3648 ng/mL (inter-individual variability of 60%) and from 102 to 11 876 ng/mL (inter-individual variability of 72%). As shown in Table 2, the antiretroviral drug combination associated with the highest dolutegravir trough concentration was dolutegravir plus darunavir/cobicistat, both given once daily (1410 ± 788 ng/mL), whereas dolutegravir once daily plus darunavir/ritonavir twice daily had the lowest trough concentrations (686 ± 481 ng/mL). Doubling the dose of dolutegravir did not result in a significant increase of drug trough concentrations compared to once daily regimens. Among the once daily regimens, the highest darunavir trough concentrations were measured with ritonavir (2850 ± 1456 ng/mL, p < .05 vs. cobicistat-based regimens). Doubling the drug dose resulted in a significant increase of darunavir trough concentrations (4445 ± 2926 ng/mL, p < .05).

Conclusions: Dolutegravir trough concentrations were significantly reduced in PWH receiving darunavir/ritonavir twice daily. This is likely related to the inductive effect of ritonavir (but not of cobicistat) on the enzymes (glucuronosyltransferase) and/or drug transporters involved in the regulation of dolutegravir disposition [doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx055]. Doubling the dose of dolutegravir did not result in a significant increase in the drug trough concentrations. This evidence should be carefully considered in clinical conditions that require higher dolutegravir exposure, such as in presence of DDIs with medications known to reduce dolutegravir bioavailability or in highly experienced PWH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾滋病、肝炎和其他抗病毒药物临床药理学国际研讨会摘要。
27多罗替拉韦加达鲁那韦抗逆转录病毒疗法的案例:Dario Cattaneo1, Anna Ridolfo1, Andrea Giacomelli1, Antonella Castagna2, Spinello Antinori1 and Cristina Gervasoni11Luigi Sacco University Hospital; 2IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute背景:最近的研究表明,多罗替拉韦谷浓度受抗逆转录病毒药物组合的影响不同[doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003843]。在此,我们重点研究了多罗替拉韦加达鲁那韦的联合用药,旨在探讨增效剂和/或给药时间对药物血浆谷浓度的影响:这项回顾性观察研究纳入了连续接受多罗替拉韦加达鲁那韦抗逆转录病毒疗法至少3个月的PWH,他们至少接受过一次多罗替拉韦血浆浓度评估。我们考虑了真实的谷值药物浓度(即最后一次服药后 12 或 24 小时采集的血样)或通过药代动力学模型反推的谷值浓度,其中考虑了最后一次服药与采集血样之间的时间间隔以及药物的终末半衰期。没有明确说明最后一次服药和/或抽血时间的样本被排除在研究之外。同时接受强效药物诱导剂(如利福平、卡马西平、NNRTIs)治疗的吸毒者不包括在内:统计分析纳入了 116 名 PWH 的 200 份多鲁曲韦 TDM。多鲁曲韦和达鲁那韦的谷浓度范围分别为 70 至 3648 纳克/毫升(个体间差异为 60%)和 102 至 11 876 纳克/毫升(个体间差异为 72%)。如表 2 所示,多鲁曲韦谷浓度最高的抗逆转录病毒药物组合是多鲁曲韦加达鲁那韦/考比司他(均为每日一次)(1410 ± 788 ng/mL),而多鲁曲韦每日一次加达鲁那韦/利托那韦每日两次的谷浓度最低(686 ± 481 ng/mL)。与每日一次方案相比,多鲁特韦剂量加倍并不会导致药物谷浓度显著增加。在每日一次的治疗方案中,使用利托那韦测得的达鲁那韦谷浓度最高(2850 ± 1456 ng/mL,与基于考比司他(cobicistat)的治疗方案相比,p < .05)。药物剂量加倍会导致达芦那韦谷浓度显著增加(4445 ± 2926 ng/mL,p <.05):结论:每天两次服用达芦那韦/利托那韦的PWH患者体内的多罗替拉韦谷浓度明显降低。这可能与利托那韦(而非氯比司他)对参与多鲁曲韦处置调节的酶(葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶)和/或药物转运体的诱导作用有关[doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx055]。多鲁特韦剂量加倍并不会导致药物谷浓度显著升高。在需要较高多鲁特韦暴露量的临床条件下,如与已知会降低多鲁特韦生物利用度的药物存在DDIs或经验丰富的PWH时,应仔细考虑这一证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
期刊最新文献
Low-dose amitriptyline: A potential therapeutic option for chronic pain in older people. Antidotes in the management of poisoned patients: What have we gained over the last decade? Implementability of opioid deprescribing interventions at transitions of care: A scoping review. Killing several birds with one stone: A multi-indication population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimator for enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Strategies employed and experiences associated with the implementation of pharmaceutical services and interventions in geriatric wards: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1