A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Unveiling the Pivotal Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in Drug Overdose Treatment Optimization.

Hany A Zaki, Yavuz Yigit, Mohamed Elgassim, Eman E Shaban, Amira Shaban, Stuart A Lloyd, Mazin Sharafeldien Elsayed Mohamed, Aftab Mohammad Azad
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Unveiling the Pivotal Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in Drug Overdose Treatment Optimization.","authors":"Hany A Zaki, Yavuz Yigit, Mohamed Elgassim, Eman E Shaban, Amira Shaban, Stuart A Lloyd, Mazin Sharafeldien Elsayed Mohamed, Aftab Mohammad Azad","doi":"10.30476/beat.2024.102203.1503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits and drawbacks of administering ECMO/ECLS therapies to drug-intoxicated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From inception until April 30, 2024, an extensive search was performed on four main databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. There was no restriction on the search period. Only the studies that reported survival to hospital discharge rates, adverse events, and the utilization of ECMO/ECLS in the treatment of intoxicated patients were included. On the other hand, articles that did not report adverse events or hospital discharge rates as outcomes, as well as studies published in languages other than English, were excluded. The evaluated outcomes were the rate of survival to hospital discharge rate and the incidence of adverse events associated with ECMO therapy. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was employed to appraise each study to determine its methodological quality. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software (version 3.0) for statistical analysis was used, with the random effects model (due to high heterogeneity among the studies) and a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total search of 2216 search results, only 10 studies were included. The pooled analysis from 10 studies indicated that ECMO therapies among drug-overdosed/poisoned patients were associated with a significant survival to hospital discharge rate of 65.6% ([95% CI: 51.5%-77.4%], <i>p</i>=0.030). However, the outcomes were highly heterogeneous (I<sup>2</sup>=83.47%), which could be attributed to the use of several medicines by different studies. In contrast, ECMO therapies among drug-overdosed patients were associated with a significant incidence rate of adverse events of 23.1% ([95% CI: 12.3%-39.2%], <i>p</i>=0.002). However, the pooled analysis had a significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=70.27%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite various health complications, extracorporeal membrane treatment enhanced survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcomes. Hence, it was a viable, effective, and feasible alternative for managing drug-induced intoxication in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"12 3","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2024.102203.1503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits and drawbacks of administering ECMO/ECLS therapies to drug-intoxicated patients.

Methods: From inception until April 30, 2024, an extensive search was performed on four main databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. There was no restriction on the search period. Only the studies that reported survival to hospital discharge rates, adverse events, and the utilization of ECMO/ECLS in the treatment of intoxicated patients were included. On the other hand, articles that did not report adverse events or hospital discharge rates as outcomes, as well as studies published in languages other than English, were excluded. The evaluated outcomes were the rate of survival to hospital discharge rate and the incidence of adverse events associated with ECMO therapy. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was employed to appraise each study to determine its methodological quality. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software (version 3.0) for statistical analysis was used, with the random effects model (due to high heterogeneity among the studies) and a 95% confidence interval.

Results: From a total search of 2216 search results, only 10 studies were included. The pooled analysis from 10 studies indicated that ECMO therapies among drug-overdosed/poisoned patients were associated with a significant survival to hospital discharge rate of 65.6% ([95% CI: 51.5%-77.4%], p=0.030). However, the outcomes were highly heterogeneous (I2=83.47%), which could be attributed to the use of several medicines by different studies. In contrast, ECMO therapies among drug-overdosed patients were associated with a significant incidence rate of adverse events of 23.1% ([95% CI: 12.3%-39.2%], p=0.002). However, the pooled analysis had a significant heterogeneity (I2=70.27%).

Conclusion: Despite various health complications, extracorporeal membrane treatment enhanced survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcomes. Hence, it was a viable, effective, and feasible alternative for managing drug-induced intoxication in patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性回顾和荟萃分析揭示了体外膜氧合(ECMO)在药物过量治疗优化中的关键作用。
目的:本研究旨在评估对药物中毒患者实施 ECMO/ECLS 治疗的临床利弊:本研究旨在评估对药物中毒患者实施 ECMO/ECLS 治疗的临床利弊:从开始到 2024 年 4 月 30 日,在四个主要数据库中进行了广泛搜索:PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE。检索时间不受限制。只有报告了从存活到出院的比率、不良事件以及使用 ECMO/ECLS 治疗中毒患者的研究才被纳入。另一方面,未将不良事件或出院率作为结果报告的文章以及以英语以外的语言发表的研究均被排除在外。评估的结果为从存活到出院的比率以及与 ECMO 治疗相关的不良事件发生率。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对每项研究进行评估,以确定其方法学质量。使用综合荟萃分析(CMA)软件(3.0 版)进行统计分析,采用随机效应模型(由于研究之间存在高度异质性)和 95% 置信区间:在总共 2216 条搜索结果中,只有 10 项研究被纳入。10 项研究的汇总分析表明,药物过量/中毒患者接受 ECMO 治疗后,出院存活率高达 65.6%([95% CI:51.5%-77.4%],P=0.030)。然而,研究结果差异很大(I2=83.47%),这可能是由于不同研究使用了多种药物。相比之下,药物过量患者接受 ECMO 治疗的不良事件发生率高达 23.1%([95% CI:12.3%-39.2%],P=0.002)。然而,汇总分析具有显著的异质性(I2=70.27%):结论:尽管存在各种健康并发症,体外膜治疗提高了患者的出院存活率,并取得了良好的神经功能预后。因此,体外膜治疗是治疗药物中毒患者的一种可行、有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1