SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection tests: test performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105394
Isabell Wagenhäuser, Kerstin Knies, Tamara Pscheidl, Michael Eisenmann, Sven Flemming, Nils Petri, Miriam McDonogh, Agmal Scherzad, Daniel Zeller, Anja Gesierich, Anna Katharina Seitz, Regina Taurines, Ralf-Ingo Ernestus, Johannes Forster, Dirk Weismann, Benedikt Weißbrich, Johannes Liese, Christoph Härtel, Oliver Kurzai, Lars Dölken, Alexander Gabel, Manuel Krone
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection tests: test performance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of COVID-19 vaccination.","authors":"Isabell Wagenhäuser, Kerstin Knies, Tamara Pscheidl, Michael Eisenmann, Sven Flemming, Nils Petri, Miriam McDonogh, Agmal Scherzad, Daniel Zeller, Anja Gesierich, Anna Katharina Seitz, Regina Taurines, Ralf-Ingo Ernestus, Johannes Forster, Dirk Weismann, Benedikt Weißbrich, Johannes Liese, Christoph Härtel, Oliver Kurzai, Lars Dölken, Alexander Gabel, Manuel Krone","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection tests (RDTs) emerged as point-of-care diagnostics alongside reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective performance assessment from 12 November 2020 to 30 June 2023 at a single centre tertiary care hospital, the sensitivity and specificity (primary endpoints) of RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL®, Panbio™, MEDsan®) were compared to RT-qPCR as reference standard among patients, accompanying persons and staff aged ≥ six month in large-scale, clinical screening use. Regression models were used to assess influencing factors on RDT performance (secondary endpoints).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 78,798 paired RDT/RT-qPCR results analysed, overall RDT sensitivity was 34.5% (695/2016; 95% CI 32.4-36.6%), specificity 99.6% (76,503/76,782; 95% CI 99.6-99.7%). Over the pandemic course, sensitivity decreased in line with a lower rate of individuals showing typical COVID-19 symptoms. The lasso regression model showed that a higher viral load and typical COVID-19 symptoms were directly significantly correlated with the likelihood of a positive RDT result in SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas age, sex, vaccination status, and the Omicron VOC were not.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The decline in RDT sensitivity throughout the pandemic can primarily be attributed to the reduced prevalence of symptomatic infections among vaccinated individuals and individuals infected with Omicron VOC. RDTs remain valuable for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals and offer potential for detecting other respiratory pathogens in the post-pandemic era, underscoring their importance in infection control efforts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria, Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"109 ","pages":"105394"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection tests (RDTs) emerged as point-of-care diagnostics alongside reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as reference.

Methods: In a prospective performance assessment from 12 November 2020 to 30 June 2023 at a single centre tertiary care hospital, the sensitivity and specificity (primary endpoints) of RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL®, Panbio™, MEDsan®) were compared to RT-qPCR as reference standard among patients, accompanying persons and staff aged ≥ six month in large-scale, clinical screening use. Regression models were used to assess influencing factors on RDT performance (secondary endpoints).

Findings: Among 78,798 paired RDT/RT-qPCR results analysed, overall RDT sensitivity was 34.5% (695/2016; 95% CI 32.4-36.6%), specificity 99.6% (76,503/76,782; 95% CI 99.6-99.7%). Over the pandemic course, sensitivity decreased in line with a lower rate of individuals showing typical COVID-19 symptoms. The lasso regression model showed that a higher viral load and typical COVID-19 symptoms were directly significantly correlated with the likelihood of a positive RDT result in SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas age, sex, vaccination status, and the Omicron VOC were not.

Interpretation: The decline in RDT sensitivity throughout the pandemic can primarily be attributed to the reduced prevalence of symptomatic infections among vaccinated individuals and individuals infected with Omicron VOC. RDTs remain valuable for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals and offer potential for detecting other respiratory pathogens in the post-pandemic era, underscoring their importance in infection control efforts.

Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria, Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速检测测试:COVID-19 大流行期间的测试性能和 COVID-19 疫苗接种的影响。
背景:SARS-CoV-2抗原快速检测试剂盒(RDTs)与作为参考的反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)一起成为护理点诊断试剂盒:方法: 2020年11月12日至2023年6月30日,在一家单中心三级护理医院进行的前瞻性性能评估中,将三个制造商(NADAL®、Panbio™、MEDsan®)生产的RDT与作为参考标准的RT-qPCR进行了比较,RT-qPCR用于大规模临床筛查中年龄≥6个月的患者、陪同人员和工作人员。采用回归模型评估 RDT 性能的影响因素(次要终点):在分析的 78,798 份配对 RDT/RT-qPCR 结果中,RDT 的总体灵敏度为 34.5% (695/2016; 95% CI 32.4-36.6%),特异度为 99.6% (76,503/76,782; 95% CI 99.6-99.7%)。在大流行过程中,随着出现典型 COVID-19 症状的人数减少,灵敏度也随之降低。套索回归模型显示,较高的病毒载量和典型的 COVID-19 症状与 SARS-CoV-2 感染者的 RDT 检测结果呈阳性的可能性直接显著相关,而年龄、性别、疫苗接种状况和 Omicron VOC 则不相关:在整个大流行期间,RDT 灵敏度下降的主要原因是疫苗接种者和 Omicron VOC 感染者中无症状感染的发生率降低。RDT 对于检测无症状人群中的 SARS-CoV-2 仍然很有价值,并有可能在大流行后检测其他呼吸道病原体,这凸显了 RDT 在感染控制工作中的重要性:德国联邦教育与研究部 (BMBF)、巴伐利亚自由州、巴伐利亚州卫生与保健部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
B7H6 is the predominant activating ligand driving natural killer cell-mediated killing in patients with liquid tumours: evidence from clinical, in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies. Continuous characterisation of exacerbation pathophysiology using wearable technologies in free-living outpatients with COPD: a prospective observational cohort study. Advancing respiratory virus diagnostics: integrating the nasal IFN-I score for improved viral detection. Association of short-term exposure to ambient air pollution and temperature with bronchiectasis mortality: a nationwide time-stratified case-crossover study. Development and evaluation of an antigen targeting lateral flow test for Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1